Killing Matt is non-mainstream, but non-mainstream is not killing Matt. To understand several concepts, first, non-mainstream and "non-mainstream" are different. The real non-mainstream is to publicize personality and stand out from the crowd. I have no objection to this. In the vast world, everyone has the right to express himself. But grandstanding is wrong, especially for some post-90 s children, who have lost the most basic understanding of beauty and paralyzed people's standard measurement of beauty. This kind of "beauty" is really not worth pursuing. They often lose the vigor and vitality of this age group, and there is no trace of being erased. Second, "post-90s" and "non-mainstream" are not the same thing. I firmly believe that most of the post-90 s children are good, and "non-mainstream" patients are only a few; Third, "patriots" and "opposing non-mainstream" are not the same thing. Those who oppose "non-mainstream" are not necessarily patriots, but anyone in their right mind will oppose "non-mainstream".