Isn't that why Founder sued P&G for being soft? The word "soft" on the shampoo package was taken to court by Founder without authorization. If you press intellectual property rights, there should be the possibility of infringement. Because of the previous case, Founder is much smarter and has done a good job in intellectual property protection and evidence chain collection. The following is the final judgment of Founder Group against Procter & Gamble:
Our judgment is as follows:
Reject the appeal and uphold the original judgment.
The acceptance fee for the first and second trial cases is 9990 yuan each, which shall be borne by Beijing Peking University Founder Electronics Co., Ltd. (paid).
This is the final judgment.
Presiding Judge: Rui Yan Song.
Acting judge; Yinyue
Acting judge: Wang Dongyong
20 1 1 July 5, 2008