Thank you, Chairman. Hello!

Throughout history, the relationship between man and nature has moved from unity to independence, and people-oriented has given full play to man's independence. But at the same time, "everything belongs to people and everything is for people." Slogans have also brought about the uncontrolled expansion of human desires. When the triumph of industrial civilization is played, the devastated nature is the first victim of mankind. Now, we finally realize that man and nature should live in harmony. But when discussing the road to environmental protection, how can we repeat the same mistakes? We believe that environmental protection should be based on nature, and the so-called nature-oriented means respecting the internal assembly of nature, following the laws of nature, taking into account human development, and realizing the harmony between man and nature on this basis. First of all, environmental protection is a reflection on the relationship between man and nature, recognizing that the intrinsic value of nature determines that environmental protection should be based on nature. With the development of human civilization, we are more and more aware that man is a part of nature, and human survival and development depend on the balance of nature. Modern ecological research tells us that no life is worthless or just a tool of another life. "Won't be more demanding to be transplanted than any other natural flower? ? "Everything in nature has its inherent survival value and is not an accessory of human beings. Therefore, respecting the intrinsic value of nature is the premise of realizing the harmony between man and nature, and also the guarantee of the success of environmental protection. Secondly, putting nature into action is beyond people-oriented. On the one hand, human beings are not the center of nature, so it is undoubtedly an instrumental view of nature to understand nature only from the perspective of human survival and development. Only by taking the interconnection of the whole survival system as the starting point of our understanding of nature can we better understand our environment. On the other hand, environmental protection is the product that people's survival needs cannot be reconciled with the natural environment. The pursuit of environmental protection based on nature is the balance of the whole survival system including people, not just to meet people's needs. Furthermore, based on nature, we are required to consciously follow the principles of nature and control people's survival within the scope of natural balance, so as to avoid the vicious circle of "pollution first and then governance, while governance and pollution" that people-oriented institutions often fall into. In a word, the key to the success of environmental protection lies in the remolding of human values. "If you stay in an ordinary building for a long time, you can return to nature." Nature-oriented is a reflection and transcendence of people-oriented, and it is also the value orientation of our environmental protection. Thank you.

Thank you, hosts, judges, debaters and lovely netizens. Good morning!

First of all, it is obviously narrow to point out the mistakes of the other party's views. "People-oriented" means that only the interests of the whole nature are regarded as the interests of mankind, while ignoring other interests to talk about environmental protection, which can only be a good wish. Man's crazy plunder of nature has caused serious damage to the environment. The utilitarian attitude of human beings is not conducive to the realization of environmental protection and the realization of human real value.

Our view is that environmental protection should be based on nature.

Environment refers to the sum of all kinds of natural and artificially transformed natural factors that affect human survival and development, and is divided into natural environment and social environment. Nature not only refers to all substances including natural environment and social environment, but also includes the inherent laws of the change and development of natural environment and social environment.

Environmental protection is a job to prevent the deterioration of the natural environment and improve the environment to make it suitable for human labor and life.

What is the so-called essence? We believe that essence is the root.

The so-called nature-oriented means that human beings are the main body of environmental protection. To achieve effective environmental protection, we must first respect the intrinsic value of nature, follow the laws of nature, take into account the all-round and harmonious development of the whole nature, including human beings, and realize the harmony between man and nature on this basis. We don't deny people's value and people-oriented. But on the issue of environmental protection, people-oriented is a kind of instrumental rationality contained in nature, and nature-oriented is the ultimate "foundation".

Let's explain our views from several aspects:

First of all, man is a part of nature, not a master above nature. On the one hand, being born in nature is the son of nature. He has natural attributes and social attributes, and natural attributes are the basic attributes of human beings. Therefore, human beings cannot live without nature and must rely on it. As a biological organism, human beings should first meet the basic physiological needs of survival, safety and reproduction. On the other hand, human beings originated from nature and evolved in nature, and their existence and development are part of natural development. Certain natural conditions are the premise of human survival and development, which provide all kinds of indispensable resources and broad space for human activities. Whether the specific natural conditions are good or bad will promote or delay the development of human society, so human development must follow the laws of nature. Only by protecting nature can human beings develop and society progress. Therefore, we should not be limited to local environmental protection based on people, but should be extended to the whole based on nature. All activities of people with cultural creation as the main body must be brought into the category of nature, and all their activities must be based on nature.

Second, nature endows people with inherent virtues and sacred mission, which is the foundation of human environmental protection. People have subjective initiative.

He can transform and use nature. In this sense, human beings are the main body of environmental protection. However, nature provides all resources and conditions for human survival and development, endows human with inherent virtue and sacred mission, and makes the whole natural ecology develop in a balanced and harmonious way. If human beings want to realize the highest value of life-"harmony with heaven and earth" in practice, they must carry out environmental protection practice according to the laws and requirements of nature, which is the root and source. Not the so-called human needs.

Third, the value of human beings is finally reflected after the realization of Tiande. In other words, nature is the source of human life value. Nature has inherent vitality and constantly creates life, so everything in nature is full of vitality. As far as the relationship between man and nature is concerned, nature is not only the source of human life, but also the source of human life value. Man himself is creative, but his creative ability has a premise. Man is by no means the "legislator" of nature, but the implementer and executor of the "intrinsic value" of nature.

"Nature-oriented" means that environmental protection pursues the balance of the whole survival system, including people. It requires not only the development of human beings and other species, but also the harmonious development of other species and human beings, and the further development of human beings. Taking "nature-oriented" as a moral obligation will help people get rid of self-centeredness, thus helping people consciously care for the environment, seek human development from the overall situation, and show the true value of human beings. "Environmental protection is a reflection on the relationship between man and nature, recognizing that the intrinsic value of nature determines that environmental protection should be based on nature."

Nature is valuable and can be divided into intrinsic value and extrinsic value. The intrinsic value of nature is its need for the survival and development of human beings and other life. Its external value is its existence, which maintains the benign development of the basic process of the earth. The direct purpose of environmental protection is to achieve sustainable development, so as to meet the needs of human long-term survival and development. The other debater's humanism only sees the external value of nature (that is, the instrumentality of nature).

The "anthropocentrism" of "people-oriented" leads people to take too much from nature and cause fundamental damage to natural value. With the destruction of the natural environment, mankind is bound to decline, and the disappearance of Loulan, a once prosperous ancient civilization, is a bloody lesson. The slogan of "environmental protection" is a reflection on the relationship between man and nature, which recognizes the intrinsic value of nature and determines that environmental protection should be based on nature.

History and national conditions tell us that while pursuing economic growth, affluent life and social progress, human beings must abide by the laws and rules of nature, so that they will not arbitrarily expand their own needs, and only look at the current interests can take into account the development needs of our future generations. Let future generations not only feel the rich cultural heritage of their ancestors, but also enjoy the beautiful natural environment left by their ancestors.

The harmonious development between man and nature is an environmental protection policy advocated today, which truly recognizes the relationship between man and nature and the position and role of man in nature. In a word, we believe that environmental protection should be based on nature.

1

Question:

1, nature, nature, is naturally formed, conforms to objective laws, and is independent of human will. Without nature, wouldn't human beings born in nature and returning to nature cease to exist? The skin doesn't exist, and the hair will still be attached? 2. Engels said: "We should not be too intoxicated with our victory over nature, and every such victory will naturally retaliate against us." What do other debaters think?

3. All countries talk about people-oriented, but their behaviors are very different, even different in each country, not to mention everyone? What kind of people should the opposing debater be based on?

4. Is ecological balance a subjective judgment of human beings or a natural ecological balance?

Now, due to the need of environmental protection, we should close a large number of factories. Are these factory owners people-oriented or people-oriented

6. Another debater emphasized that people-oriented can make people live in harmony with nature. But how limited is human desire? 7. What is the boundary of human desire?

8. May I ask another debater, how did you determine that a piece of land should be returned to forest?

A: The premise of returning to forest is that it is suitable for planting trees here. If it is only suitable for raising fish, it can't be returned to forest. Therefore, taking nature as the basis is the principle.

9. What is the objective standard of people-oriented?

Then, the harmony between man and nature means that man conforms to the law of nature, not that nature adapts to man.

10, people-oriented, what is people-oriented?

1 1. People's ideas are scattered. Who's ideas have universal values? 12, everyone has desires, and it is impossible to effectively protect the environment by satisfying them. 13, may I ask another debater, how do you overcome the profitability of human beings?

12, countries have different national conditions, developed countries need to develop and developing countries need to survive. How can we achieve the same benefits in protecting the environment? Facing nature

1, protecting the environment is a process, in which we need a value concept, that is, respecting the laws of nature, that is, taking nature as the foundation.

In the concrete actions to protect the environment, nature is the object of our service, and all our activities revolve around nature. For example, today's debate, we are all human beings, but today's competition is centered on this debate, which means that debate is the foundation of today.

3. Nature-oriented means to make nature the main body, and people and nature can have an equal dialogue to meet the needs and urgency of the environment, so as to better protect the environment.

4, based on nature, does not mean that human beings do nothing in the face of nature, but do something according to the laws of nature (that is, objective laws). Because the objective law cannot be changed, it is an objective reality that is not transferred by human will.

5. Nature is also actively acting on people. 6. Nature is fundamental and irreversible.

6. Practical operation: (1) Let nature take its course. (2) Do it according to its natural principles within the established natural laws.

Expand the environment.

1, the opponent's debater magnified the environment, making today's debate lose its comparative significance, and finally making the argument untenable.

2. Can nature also be understood as a natural attitude? 3. Lao Tzu said that existence is nature. Is everything that exists natural? What is based on nature?

1. It is natural here and now. 2. People and animals have the same nature. 3. The utilization resources of man-made articles come from nature. The laws of nature are not natural.

1, the other party said that the laws of nature are superior to man and nature, which can only strengthen our point of view and show that the laws of nature are inviolable and must be followed. We can't agree with each other that the laws of nature exist alone, because if the laws of nature can exist without nature, what is nature? Is it just a problem? (Nature is natural substance+laws and rules of nature. Although in philosophy, laws can really exist alone, at least they can make up for their disadvantages. ) In the real nature, the law advocated is survival of the fittest, survival of the fittest. 1, "Heaven is well-behaved, those who follow it prosper, and those who go against it die." 2. The laws of nature are a subset of nature, not unique. Nature is passive and unconscious. 1, naturally it can also take the initiative to act on people.

The starting point of protecting the environment can only be to protect people. The unfavorable environment will still be destroyed and conquered. 1, it exists, it has its rationality. The desert also has its meaning. When the interests of human beings conflict with those of nature

1. Today, another debater told us that we have too little demand for nature. Is this really the case today? Are we asking too little or too much for nature? Americans can't eat much rice and corn. Why don't we give it to the African people?

All-round harmony and coordinated development between man and nature.

1, the harmony between man and nature * * * Life is that man adapts to nature, not nature adapts to man.

Science has proved that human beings are only one of many biological species and a part of nature, not the scale of everything. At the same time, due to the limitations of subjective and objective conditions, human understanding has great limitations. Moreover, whether human understanding is correct, whether it can be improved and developed, can not be separated from the activities of understanding and transforming nature (that is, practice), especially the understanding and grasp of the laws of nature, and can not be separated from the relationship between man and nature. In today's tide of world change, General Secretary Hu emphasized that the other party said

1, "people-oriented" refers to the political and economic field, and environmental protection belongs to the natural field, so the theory is invalid.

2. Today, when Scientific Outlook on Development is advocated, people generally think that people-oriented can ensure the harmony between man and nature, but history tells us that the reality is not consistent with our understanding. Because adhering to the monism of people-oriented is the master theory that human beings regard themselves as masters, and the result is that nature is regarded as an object of slavery and an objective entity in an inanimate state. Give authority to economics.

Economic theory transcends theoretical boundaries in the field of environmental protection. Economics emphasizes methods, which is universal.

The situation in the economic field is not optimistic. Who dares to hire a housekeeper who can't even take care of his own family? Who can believe it?

three

Universal answer

1, in fact, no matter how much you talk about people-oriented, it shows that you are nature-oriented, but you don't realize the essential problem. Therefore, no matter how much you talk about people-oriented, you can only strengthen our position. Therefore, students who oppose it don't have to entangle in any debate, because you can only confuse your own position!

What we call the concept based on nature emphasizes respecting all things in nature and following the laws of nature, instead of just comparing one thing with another. Example:

1. The Pearl River Delta artificially protects nature, but the result is "green pollution". Why did someone protect it, but it achieved the opposite effect?

2. The vicinity of the 38th parallel on the Korean peninsula has been no man's land since the war. Because of decades of no one's intervention, it has become the best environment and ecology area in the whole Korean Peninsula. Even the Northeast Tiger and the Big Brown Bear, which are considered extinct on the Korean Peninsula, have found traces of activities here. What can be done to better meet people's interests and needs? Is it better to "take nature as the foundation and govern by doing nothing"?

We all know that eating whales is an unscientific behavior and an environmentally unfriendly behavior, but the Japanese think that eating whale meat is a part of their culture. How can other debaters achieve the unity of interests between you and the Japanese who eat whales?

4. Look at our current environmental protection actions: everyone knows to protect the rainforest, but the behavior of burning wasteland and grazing in the Amazon basin continues; Everyone knows to reduce air pollution, but the United States has been slow to sign the Kyoto Protocol. Today, when we are facing environmental problems, how can we continue to put people first and ignore the requirements of nature in order to meet people's interests? 5. Some counties and cities in Heilongjiang Province have transformed provincial wetland nature reserves and natural grasslands into fish ponds or cultivated land, which have destroyed the ecological environment and caused soil erosion. From the perspective of interests, it is not a bad thing to increase the income of the government and farmers and improve the land utilization rate, but from the perspective of long-term interests and comprehensive interests, it is not worth the candle.

Action can be better coordinated based on nature, because natural interests are unified, while human interests are not. 1, the other party said that people-oriented resistance is relatively small, I really wonder, the other party shouted the slogan so loudly, but as far as the world situation is concerned, people-oriented is impossible to achieve, because different national cultures and regions lead to people's interests and goals can not be consistent and harmonious. As the saying goes, when you are busy outside, you must settle down first. In terms of environmental protection, we humans can't even achieve internal unity and harmony, let alone live in harmony with nature and protect nature scientifically and orderly. Therefore, nature is the best choice, and people-oriented is impossible to achieve.

2. All countries talk about people-oriented, but their behaviors are quite different. I can be divided into American version, French version, Somali version and independent innovation version. A people-oriented country cannot unify this reality. Furthermore, a social unit smaller than the country is more difficult to be unified by different people's understanding of people as "individuals", "collectives" and "China". 3. The other side argues that it is still a long-term value, but the ancients told us that "the prosperity of the world is beneficial, and the prosperity of the world is beneficial." Facing the bustling people with different interests in Qian Qian, the other side argues that if we use a long-term interest, we should teach them to continue to put people first and continue to engage in environmental protection. This is impossible to achieve. Conflict time

1. Today, a little girl saved a single-crowned crane and gave up her life in order to benefit nature, or out of respect for life. She doesn't want to live forever, but wants to respect the existence of the single-crowned crane.

2. Treat the symptoms but not the root cause: For example, the polar ozone hole caused by Freon, is it enough to put Freon over the polar regions in order to put people first, because it will not endanger human survival for the time being? It is not difficult to see that people-oriented is the palliative, and only nature-oriented is the real cure. Under the concept of environmental protection based on nature, the problem should be completely solved. 、

four

sublimate

The formation of eutrophication in lakes and swamps; Mercury poisoning in Japan; The ecological environment of Aswan Dam has deteriorated; Adverse consequences after the application of "HCH" and "DDT"; The "greenhouse effect" of the earth is caused by the people-oriented thought. Today, we have to put environmental protection on people-oriented thinking, and the future looks really worrying. If we don't understand the problem objectively, I'm afraid the last drop of water on the earth on which human beings depend can only be a tear we regret. As we all know, being invisible does not mean that there is no pollution, and hearing does not mean that there is no pollution, but people-oriented will make our body and mind turn a blind eye to the fact that nature has been destroyed, and we will not hear the cries and warnings of everything before death! The alarm of nature has sounded to us more than once. When the triumph of industrial civilization is played, the devastated nature is the first victim of mankind! Therefore, here we have to loudly appeal: environmental protection should be based on nature!

Birds flying freely are the happiest, sports running freely are the happiest, rivers running freely are the most carefree and everything is the most natural. People are the premise.

1, the other debater, man still comes from nature, and nature is still the premise of man. Does this have anything to do with what the foundation is? 2. The other debater deviated from the topic and could not talk about protecting the environment without talking about people. Today's debate confirms the premise of human beings, but who is the key? Protecting the environment must be based on the concept of nature. People are the foundation.

1, may I ask the opposing debater, is this the basis? Everything people do must follow the law, that is, is there a legal basis? Nokia put forward people-oriented, why not say it is based on economic laws?

2. We never object that man is an actor to protect the environment, but the idea of the actor is the foundation, and this idea must be based on nature.

People are the purpose, and people are the beneficiaries of environmental protection: protecting the environment is not to protect the environment, but to make people live better.

1, the logic of the counter argument has skipped a layer. The purpose of protecting the environment is to have a better environment. With a better environment, we can develop better.

2. Our aim is to make people live better, but what is the basis? What are the principles and mentality of protecting the environment? Taking nature as the criterion can be more conducive to protecting the environment.

All human activities are for the better survival of human beings, but today our debate is about the specific behavior of protecting the environment, that is, the principle of behavior. Then according to the logic of the other debater, today's debate should be people-oriented and protect mankind. The opponent's statement is to do whatever it takes to achieve the goal. So my goal is to rule the world, so I want to be the second Hitler?

We admit that the purpose of environmental protection is for people, but what principles should be followed in environmental protection is the basis. Of course, in environmental protection, we should be based on nature.

6. If environmental protection is for the benefit of mankind, what is the virgin forest for? We are cutting down large areas of trees and replanting them. Is it environmental protection? It is virgin forest and artificial forest, and there are insurmountable gullies.

7. Whatever people do, the ultimate goal is for themselves. We don't deny it, but whether this goal can be used as the discussion of original value. For example, the fundamental purpose of businessmen is to make money, but the business community never advocates taking interests as the basis, but taking honesty as the basis. What is honesty? It is the laws and rules that people should follow in the course of business operation.

8. The all-round development of mankind is the ultimate goal hanging on the other side of the history of human thought. This is too far from what we call protecting the environment.

People-oriented also exists in the process.

How to embody people-oriented in the process? The process is the methods and measures used in protecting the environment, and all these measures can not be separated from the constraints of natural laws, otherwise human beings can only eat their own fruit and be retaliated by nature.

five

The problem of human survival. "Environmental protection must take human survival as the core, at least let people live, so environmental protection should be people-oriented.

1. Today, the destruction of the environment is not for survival, but the result of the expansion of desire. Another debater only saw that the ecology deteriorated because of the world, but did not see that the world deteriorated because of the mentality. "2, survival is the premise, can't say this is people-oriented.

I want to ask another debater, can the hunger, poverty and food problems of thousands of people be solved by environmental protection alone? As the saying goes, "the wine in Zhumen stinks, and there are frozen bones on the road." This is our problem, not environmental protection.

If natural problems are not solved, where will the food problem come from? We eat one today and another tomorrow, and keep asking nature for it. Finally, we didn't eat. Is it necessary to rely on "painting cakes to satisfy hunger"? The root of the conflict is that 20% people occupy 80% of the resources, and they constantly fill their endless desires. People must infiltrate their own consciousness in the process of transforming and protecting the environment. 1, we don't deny the role of people, but today's debate is about who is the foundation.

In the past, we caused environmental problems under improper methods, but that was just a method problem, and its fundamental idea was no problem.

1 is thought-guided. Do you think the right thought knows the right method, or the wrong thought can produce the right thought? Everything emphasizes people.

Another debater made the mistake of "anthropocentrism" and ignored the objective laws, with disastrous consequences. What orientation is to protect the environment with what principles and mentality. Compare and debate, weigh the advantages and disadvantages, and take nature as the foundation, so that people can develop better. People-oriented is our foothold;

1, people must have three characteristics to survive and develop:

1) consumes resources-people have the characteristics of seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages, and the efficiency is higher based on nature; 2) adapt to the environment-nature is the foundation for existence, and people are blind.

3) Long-term stability-a vision based on nature and a threshold based on people. Based on nature, we can realize that human rationality is lower than natural rationality, explore and seek truth more carefully, and achieve better development. 2. People are all profit-seeking, and nature-oriented can overcome profit-seeking.

3. "People-oriented" means objectifying and passivating nature, and measuring nature by artificial standards, which leads to natural alienation. 4, people-oriented is impossible, and once we abandon the nature-oriented, then people-oriented in most cases will only become a high-level cover for some people to obtain violence by destroying the environment.

Man is the subject and executor of environmental protection.

1, the behavior of protecting the environment is issued by people, but this behavior is based on the guiding ideology of "taking nature as the foundation". 2. The environment is a protected person, and the environmental law itself is a code of conduct.

Another debater told us today that what people do is people-oriented, so I don't know where the definition of what people do comes from. We say that economic development is based on education. Don't you want people to do it? Do you want to do it with education? Does education develop economy?