History of Palestinian Jews
Palestine is located in the west of Asia, between the Mediterranean Sea, the Dead Sea and the Jordan River, covering an area of about 27,000 square kilometers. In 3000 BC, Canaanites, a semi-nomadic tribe who moved from Arabian Peninsula, settled in Palestine, and established Canaanite State in 2000 BC. Later, the Phoenicians along the Aegean Sea came to the coastal areas of Palestine. The name "Palestine" means "Phoenician land" in Greek. Later, in 1200 BC, the ancestors of the Jews (Hebrews) came to Palestine. Jews lived in Palestine for about 1300 years from BC 1200 to AD 135. Hebrews are nomadic people who used to live in the Euphrates River valley (today's Iraq) and later moved to Egypt. Before 1200 BC, the Hebrews were bullied and oppressed by the Egyptian rulers and moved to Palestine under the leadership of their leader Moses.
After the Jews came to Palestine, they fought against the Canaanites and Phoenicians who had already settled here, and established the Hebrew Kingdom in 1025 BC. Later, Jerusalem became the capital. In 923 BC, the Hebrew Kingdom was divided into two parts, the northern part called the Kingdom of Israel and the southern part called the Kingdom of Judaism. Later, all Hebrews were called Jews. In 722 BC, the Assyrian Empire conquered the kingdom of Israel, and its residents were assimilated by Assyrians. Since then, the process of Jews' outward dispersion has begun. In 586 BC, the new Babylon destroyed the Jewish kingdom, and its king and a large number of residents were taken to Babylon.
In 538 BC, the Persian Empire, which occupied present-day Iran, conquered Babylon. Persia tolerated Jews, actively supported Judaism and allowed Jews to return to Palestine. However, Jews are used to the bustling city life in Babylon and do not want to go back to Palestine. Only a small number of Jews returned to Palestine to settle down, and these people became the ancestors of modern Jews. At this time, there were far more Jews outside Palestine than Jews inside Palestine. In the following hundreds of years, many Jews dispersed from West Asia to South Europe, North Africa, Central Asia and other places. In BC 143, Jews got rid of the rule of Greek Jews and established an independent country. However, this recovery did not bring the diaspora back to Palestine. In 64 BC, the Roman Empire invaded and destroyed the Jewish state and exercised cruel rule over the Jews. During the rule of the Roman Empire, Jews held four great uprisings to resist the cruel oppression and rule of the Roman Empire. But all the uprisings were brutally suppressed, and the Roman Empire slaughtered more than 1 10,000 Jews. By AD 132, most Jews were driven out of Palestine except those who were killed, ending the 1300-year history of Jews settling in Palestine. In the long years that followed, a few Jews were partly assimilated by the local people, but few people kept their Jewish beliefs and national consciousness. For example, in 1 170, there were only 1440 Jews in Palestine.
Based on the above history, Zionism expelled the Palestinians from Palestine in the 20th century and established the State of Israel. At that time, the ancestors of Jews once lived in what is now Iraq and Egypt. Do Jews also have the right to expel the present Iraqis or Egyptians and establish a Jewish state on a piece of land in Iraq or Egypt? The ancient Romans once occupied Palestine. Do the descendants of the ancient Romans now have the right to demand the occupation of Palestine?
At first, many West Renye Fang opposed Zionist demands. "19 19, US President Wilson appointed the Kim Crane Committee to investigate the Zionist claim that the first occupation of Palestine by Jews gave Jews the right to own this land. The investigation on this issue is as follows:' Zionist representatives often put forward that they have Palestinian ownership according to the occupation before 2000. This self-proclaimed initial ownership is difficult to seriously consider. In fact, the vast majority of the 24,000 Jews living there are strongly opposed to the establishment of a Jewish state on Arab land. A year later, in a debate on the Palestinian issue in the British House of Lords, Lord Siddenham responded to many previous and future views. He said,' I fully sympathize with the Jewish people's desire to establish a national homeland, but if another nation is greatly wronged by this, then I don't think such a national homeland should be established. Palestine is not the inherent home of Jews. It was occupied after their conquest, and it was never completely occupied. Now they openly demand these. They can't make a fairer demand on Palestine than the descendants of ancient Rome do on this country. "(Hart's Biography of Arafat, China Social Sciences Press, 1990, p.41,p.42).
Moreover, before the Jews came to Palestine, the Canaanites and Phoenicians had lived in Klang for a long time, and later they assimilated some of the remaining Jews. Later, he married Arabs who believed in Islam who entered the region (in fact, there were a large number of Arabs in Palestine before Islam came into being) and assimilated and evolved into Palestinians today. So it can be said that Canaanites are the ancestors of Palestinians today, and they have lived in Palestine for 5000 years. They have worked and lived here for generations and are the masters of this land.
If Jews have been oppressed in Christian parishes for a long time in Europe, Jews in Arab areas have been treated well by Arabs for a long time in history. Safran, an American scholar who joined the Israeli army to fight the Arabs when Israel was founded 1948, wrote in the book History and Overview of Israel that Jews were persecuted and killed in European Christian parishes, and also wrote, "Generally speaking, under the rule of tolerant Arab Muslims, Jews in Alexandria have prospered again ... Many of them are in the fields of politics, finance and science. When Arabs crossed the sea from North Africa to occupy Spain, Jews followed Spain. " They became powerful partners of Arabs and developed splendid civilization. All walks of life in urban and rural areas are open to Jews, and many people have obtained the highest positions in the economic, social, cultural and political fields of various Spanish countries. Therefore, Safran also believes that "the life of Jews in the western world is far worse than that in areas ruled by Islam." (Page 25-27 of the book, Beijing People's Publishing House) However, the Zionists later bite the hand that feeds them. Instead of fighting against the European and American bourgeoisie who persecuted and discriminated against them, they advocated their rights, but with the support of the European and American bourgeoisie, they cracked down on Arabs who had been kind to their ancestors for a long time, robbed Arabs of their land and houses, and drove millions of Arabs out of their homes. During and after the establishment of Israel, Zionists treated the Arab people who had been kind to Jews for a long time like the Roman Empire did to Jews.
Jews were oppressed in "civilized and democratic" Europe and North America, which made many Jews think that their nation was forced to suffer because it did not have its own country 1000 years. Therefore, at the end of 19, a Zionist movement took place among Jews in Europe and North America. The movement hopes to establish a Jewish state, and Jews from all over the world will return to this country to end the history of persecution and discrimination against their own nation. Therefore, the Zionist movement, the Jews want to establish their own country, is not the result of later persecution of Jews by fascist Germany, because they came into being many years before the emergence of fascist Germany.
It is precisely because the bourgeoisie in Europe and America is anti-Semitic, and fascist Germany is more radical (that is, the difference between 50 steps and 100 steps). Therefore, when Germany persecuted Jews, the other western countries did not take practical actions against the "humanitarian disaster" caused by fascist Germany (and now the West often attacks disobedient countries to cause "humanitarian disasters" and then gives military aggression or sanctions), nor did it take much practical assistance to the persecuted German Jews. Other countries in Europe and America generally only express regret or condemn Germany (severely). On the second day after a Polish Jew assassinated a German diplomat in France, "1938165438+10, ... Nazi groups destroyed Jewish shops, burned synagogues and attacked Jews in the street. Dozens of Jews were killed and thousands were sent to concentration camps ... This event that shocked the world was called' Crystal Night'. President Roosevelt recalled the American ambassador to show his dissatisfaction ... New magazine and magazine suggested that the United States relax immigration conditions and let persecuted Jews enter the United States. However, this proposal did not cause much repercussions ... 1939 At the beginning, Congressman robert wagner proposed that the government should allow 200,000 German refugee children to enter the United States without immigration quota, but the government kept silent about it ... Like many other governments, the US government ... did not want them to flee to the United States, so it suggested that they flee to European colonies such as Angola, Madagascar, British Guiana and Uganda (Britain had previously ..... but it failed. " Just as Rice, a black American upper class, has been completely integrated into the American ruling group, and her position is the same as that of the ruling group but different from that of ordinary blacks, Lipman, an American upper class Jew, also thinks that Nazi persecution of Jews is only a problem of "overpopulation" in Europe. "When someone urged to amend the US immigration law and accept refugees, Lippmann suggested that' surplus' Jews go to Africa. Lippmann did not publicly criticize Roosevelt for being indifferent to the tragic situation of Jews "(see pages 559 and 560 of Lippmann Biography above). 1in the middle of 939, the passenger ship "St. Louis" set off from Hamburg and arrived in Havana (Cuba was completely controlled by the United States at that time-author's note), but the refugees were refused to land because their visas did not meet the formalities, so they tried to land in Miami, but were rejected by the American government and forced to return to Europe. Although the death camp was widely known as early as 1942, lippman didn't write anything about it. ..... the State Council actually blocked the news that the Nazis planned to exterminate Jews ... The pace of killing Jews is accelerating. The Auschwitz concentration camp slaughtered 1.2 million people every day, and * * * 1 10,000 people died there. The American government, on the other hand, took a cold attitude towards the refugees and refused to blow up the railway leading to the death camp. "(The Biography of Lipman, p. 56 1 page) Therefore, the American government's attitude towards Nazi persecution of Jews is indifferent, even with its own attitude, not to mention its" noble "move of" preventing humanitarian disasters ".
After the war, the national quintessence of persecuting Jews no longer existed, but the outflow of Jews from Europe without Nazi persecution increased. "The biggest potential refuge for European Jews is the United States. 1On February 22, 945, President Truman issued a statement announcing a policy of quickly accepting political asylum seekers and refugees from Europe into the United States ... One year later,1February 22, 946, the President announced that ((British) Kirk's Middle East 1945 ~/kloc-. British Foreign Secretary "Bevan announced at the 1946 Labour Party Conference held in whitson that the reason why the United States oppressed Jews into Palestine was' because they didn't want Jews to live in New York', and an American Jewish journalist admitted that ... many of the most enthusiastic supporters of the conference were also enthusiastic advocates of restricting Jewish immigrants from entering the United States." Therefore, British scholar Kirk wrote, "These measures are not all for the benefit of Jewish refugees; "In the United States, it seems that even the Jewish community itself does not agree with any substantial increase in the number of Jewish communities; Because the total number of Jews has reached more than 5 million, and the concentration of Jews in big cities in the United States has caused a serious degree of anti-Semitism, and the Jewish community strongly hopes not to intensify. " (The Middle East in 1945 ~ 1950, p. 324) Therefore, under the high-sounding international slogan of supporting Jews to establish their own country in Palestine, the United States hides anti-Semitism and anti-Semitism at home, and hides the sinister intention of driving unpopular people in the United States to occupy other people's homes and act as their own eagle dogs in the Middle East.
Britain and America condone and support Zionism and terrorist activities.
If only Jews living in scattered countries want to restore the country, Zionism will not succeed at all without the support of powerful imperialism. The success of Zionism was mainly supported by Britain in the early stage and by the United States after the 1940s. According to the needs of the situation, western monopoly capital has set off an anti-Semitic wave from time to time to crack down on the competing Jewish bourgeoisie. On the other hand, sometimes they want to use the power of Jewish capital to serve their overseas expansion forces. It is based on the latter consideration that the Anglo-American bourgeoisie strongly supports Zionism.
1882 After Britain occupied Egypt, it especially wanted to control Palestine. Britain wanted to use Palestine as a springboard to expand into the hinterland of the Middle East (at that time, many parts of West Asia were part of the Ottoman Empire) and as the eastern barrier of the Suez Canal under its control. Britain believes that if it can do this, it will work with France and Russia to strengthen its position in the Middle East.
Britain wants to control Palestine, and Zionism wants to restore the country here. Britain's aggressive ambition coincides with Zionism's plan to revive the country, which makes their subsequent collusion possible. The earliest leader of Zionism, Gertz (Austro-Hungarian journalist and Jew), saw this possibility and wanted to realize the Zionist plan through this collusion. He published the Jewish State in 1896, which put forward a complete program for the establishment of the Jewish State. He declared that with the money of big capitalists and the support of imperialist countries, the future Jewish state would be established; This country will be ruled by the rich, while the poor can only engage in manual labor; As for the indigenous Arabs, they must be forced to work hard and then be expelled. "(The Origin of Important International Issues, page 136) He also clearly stated that" the state established by Jewish immigrants in Palestine will serve as a fortress for Europe to guard against Asia "(Zhong Dong's Eighty Years of Middle East Issues, Xinhua Publishing House, page 4, version 1984). Weizmann, the leader of Zionism and later the first president of Israel, ingratiated himself with Britain in 19 14, saying, "If Palestine enters Britain's sphere of influence and Britain encourages Jews to settle there, it is possible to introduce1100,000 or more Jews in the next 50 years, and they will form a powerful guard of the Suez Canal." "(Editorial Board's Long Series of World History after World War I, Volume IV, page 368, Shanghai People's Publishing House 1978) Zionism voluntarily acts as an eagle dog and thug of imperialism against the Asian people (first of all, the people in the Middle East).
After the outbreak of World War I, the leaders of Zionist organizations also saw that Britain would set out from Egypt to capture Palestine. They believe that with the support of Britain, the prospect of establishing a Jewish state in Palestine will be realized. Therefore, they have frequent contact with senior officials of the British government. 19 17, the British army invaded Palestine on a large scale, and the British government thought that fostering a pro-British Jewish entity in Palestine should be put on the agenda. Britain wants to use the Jewish entity to help its colonial cause in the Middle East (that is, let the Jewish entity act as its assistant and thug to oppress the Arabs); Joining the Jewish nation outside the Arab nation can make use of ethnic contradictions to balance each other and achieve the rule of divide and rule; In addition, if other countries ask countries to withdraw from the occupied areas after the war, they can help Jews build their homes as an excuse for the British to stay in Palestine for a long time. 165438+10.2, British foreign secretary Belfo officially announced in a letter to Rothschild, the leader of Zionist organization and the Jewish chaebol: "Your Majesty's government is in favor of establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine", which is the famous Balfour Declaration. A month later, the British army drove away the Turks and occupied the whole of Palestine. After the war 1922, the League of Nations officially approved Palestine as the "mandated territory" of Britain.
With the connivance of Britain, "with the support of the international Jewish capital consortium, some Jews seized Palestinian Arab land and drove away Arab farmers ... Jewish extremists also established secret armed forces specializing in terrorist activities. Arabs can't stand it any longer. 1August, 929, they held another armed riot and had a fierce conflict with Jews. " (The Source of Important International Problems, pp. 139, 140) So, we know why Palestinians are fighting Jews, because Zionists have occupied their homeland. And know that zionists are willing to take terrorist activities to occupy other people's homes. Knowing who initiated the Palestinian terrorist activities, and knowing that the terrorist activities invading other people's homes (including Israel's current state terrorism) are the reasons for the terrorist activities against occupation (of course, this is an incorrect resistance activity).
In 1930s, the number of Jewish immigrants in Palestine increased dramatically. In 1880, there were only 20,000 Jews in Pakistan, and in 19 18, there were only 50,000 Jews, accounting for 7% of the total population of Pakistan. 1939, there were 445,000 Jews in Palestine. Britain and Judaism have a tacit understanding, occupying the land of Palestinian Arabs, driving many Palestinians out of their homes, and sowing the seeds of hatred between Arabs and Jews "(The Middle East Issue in 80 Years, p. 5). The reason for the sharp increase of Palestinian Jews is not only Britain's support for Zionism, but also the wanton persecution of Jews by Nazi Germany, and the European and American countries "concerned about human rights" are indifferent to the plight of Jews and refuse them asylum, so a large number of Jews have to settle in Palestine. Therefore, we can say that it was understandable for Jews to enter Palestine at that time. But you should live in peace with Arabs who used to live here, instead of taking Arab land and houses and driving them out of their homes. Just like you take refuge in a family, you can't drive away the family that accepts you! In addition, about 1800 years ago, it was the Roman Empire that oppressed and killed your ancestors and drove them away from Palestine, not the ancestors of Arabs. Even the pro-Israel American scholar Fisher wrote, "The Zionists didn't see them invade the homeland of another country." (Fisher's History of the Middle East, Commercial Press, p. 570, 1980)
Since 1939, Britain has revised its policy of "supporting Judah and excluding Afghanistan". 1939 may 17, Britain published a white paper to restrict Jewish immigration and "buy" land. This change happened because 1936 ~ 1939, the Palestinian people rebelled against the armed uprisings of Britain and Judah, and the Arab people protested against Britain's policy of "supporting Judah and excluding Arab countries", forcing Britain to reconsider its policy. At the same time, during the Palestinian people's uprising, the German propaganda machine repeatedly expressed its support for the Arabs and tried to win over Arab countries against Britain. London is well aware of the important strategic position of the Middle East in the coming war. In order to avoid pre-war chaos, it is necessary to win over the Arab world, so it is necessary to change the policy towards Jews.
The White Paper 5. 17 was strongly opposed by Zionists, because it would make Jews never become the majority of Palestine, thus affecting their plans to restore the country in Palestine. "They generally believe that the political future of Palestine ultimately depends mainly on the established facts of power and population, rather than any legal or political formula." Therefore, "Palestinian Jews and Zionists all over the world attacked this white paper as a treacherous document, and they will defeat it at all costs ... a British policeman was killed in Jerusalem; Ben Gurion, chairman of the Executive Committee of the Jewish National Assembly (the first Israeli Prime Minister after the founding of the People's Republic of China-the author's note) declared that the assassination was a "sign" that Jews began to resist the new British policy (Middle East History, p. 569). On 194416, the Jews began to attack the British military and police, bombed railways and factories, and assassinated the British permanent minister in the Middle East. Since then, Zionism has left the British Empire and turned to the United States. Britain also saw that the United States wanted to crowd out Britain in the Middle East by supporting pro-American Jewish countries. So in the following period of time, Britain and the United States had some contradictions on the issue of Jews moving to Palestine.
"The official claim of Zionism ... was put forward in the scheme drafted by Biltmore Hotel in new york 1942. The Biltmore Plan was approved by the General Council of the Jewish National Congress in Jerusalem. The program calls for the establishment of a Jewish Republic, including the whole of Palestine, and calls for unrestricted immigration. Immigration affairs will be managed by the Jewish National Assembly. " (History of the Middle East, page 8 12) It can be seen that Zionism does not want to be with Palestinian Arabs at all. They want to monopolize Palestine, so they do not hesitate to use various methods (including threats and various violent terrorist activities) to drive Arabs out of their homes for generations. Similarly, in order to allow Jews from all over the world to move to Palestine "without restrictions", Zionism did not hesitate to treat the British authorities with terrorist activities. "Gurion has warned that if the British government acts according to the white paper of 1939 again, the answer will be Palestinian" bloody terror "and" frequent barbaric actions ". (History of the Middle East, page 8 13) Now both the West and Israel, including the United States, say that Palestinian armed groups resisting Israeli occupation engage in terrorist activities and demand that the occupiers be disarmed (they say this is illegal). However, in order to immigrate to Palestine in large numbers and drive out the indigenous Arabs of Palestine, Zionism has engaged in countless terrorist activities and established illegal armed forces specializing in terrorist activities. "Gurion approved the public actions of three illegal Zionist armed forces in Palestine." The three armed forces are Hagana, Ilgon and Resolute, and Hagana has about 60,000 members (Middle East History, 8 14).
These three armed forces not only attacked the British military and police (including bombing the British headquarters in Palestine with car bombs), but also engaged in terrorist activities in Palestine. On the nights of 1945, 10 and 3 1, Hagana commandos "pried up the tracks of the Palestinian railway at 153; Ilgon attacked Lida Railway Station; Decisive team destroyed Haifa refinery. Two weeks later, the government buildings in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv were burned down ... 1946 A few months ago ... The actions of terrorists continued ... Hagana publicly boasted that he was involved in terrorist activities. " (History of the Middle East, pages 8 15 and 8 16)
Zionism is also involved in terrorist activities against Palestinians. "The main reason for the Palestinians to flee is the panic and fear of Jewish terrorism. The scale of this terrorist activity is unmatched by Palestinians. There are two forms of Jewish terrorist activities: actual violence against Palestinians; The organized campaign of privately spreading lies, slandering and threatening Palestinians is called "psychological warfare" by Jews. The purpose of both is clear, that is, to expel Palestinians from their homes. The most terrible atrocity of Jewish terrorism was committed in the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin. On April 1948, about 260 Palestinian men, women and children were slaughtered there, and some of them were hacked to death. A pregnant woman was cut open by a butcher knife. " "Deir Yassin is not the only place where Palestinians suffered from the Holocaust. In nasr Al-Din, An Al-Zaitonghe, Al-Bina, Al-Bassa and Safsaf, the Palestinian public suffered from the disaster caused by Jewish terrorists. " (Biography of Arafat, paragraph 102- 103). 45, 46, 48) Zionism is the pioneer of Palestinian terrorist activities in modern times. They are the terrorist activities condoned and supported by the United States, which is now shouting anti-terrorism. "Zionists dare to be so bold, mainly because of the backing of the United States." The United States believes that Zionist terrorist activities will make it difficult for Britain to manage Palestine, and the United States will crowd out Britain through Zionist terrorist activities and bring this region into its sphere of influence. Regarding the founding of Israel, "some western scholars said:' It was terrorists who gave Israel to the Jews.' Regarding this history, Bei Jing, who later served as Israeli Prime Minister, once said,' Our enemies call us terrorists, … and those who are neither enemies nor friends … also use this word under the influence of British propaganda or out of habit. Our friends ... those with historical vision only call us patriots in one word. However, due to Israel's strong position in the Middle East and its alliance with the most powerful country in the world, people tend to ignore these facts (that is, the fact that Zionism has carried out terrorist activities on a large scale-author's note). (Zhang Jiadong, Shen Dingli, Terrorism in the Context of Terrorism, World Economy and Politics, February 2003)
Therefore, at that time, it was well known that Zionism took a large number of terrorist activities to establish a state in Palestine. Bei Jing also admitted that even neutrals (whom Bei Jing called "neither enemies nor friends") called them "terrorists". However, American imperialism, which hopes to cultivate an eagle dog in the Middle East and build a fortress for itself through Zionist activities, condones and supports Zionist terrorist acts and regards Zionists who are called terrorists all over the world as "patriots". As Zhang Jiadong and others have said, due to the strong support of the United States, the "most powerful country in the world", the mainstream media in the West are now silent about a large number of terrorist activities carried out by Zionism before the founding of the People's Republic of China (as well as the current state terrorism of the Israeli and Palestinian people), and they attempt to cover up ("ignore") the terrorist history of Zionism in this way.
Faced with Zionist terrorist activities, American support for Zionism, American pressure on Britain, and Britain's dependence on American support in many places after the war, Britain found it difficult to wage war with Zionism. In addition, the Arab-Israeli conflict is difficult to handle, and Britain feels unable to continue its rule over Palestine. Britain decided to give up and hand over Palestine to the United Nations.
Due to the powerful role of the United States,1October 29th, 1947 "165438+ The United Nations General Assembly adopted the partition plan for Palestine. Although Jews originally accounted for less than 1.3 population and less than 6% land, they ignored the facts and allocated 57% land in this country to Jews. United Nations resolutions are inconsistent with international law. Henry Thangka wrote: The United Nations: "At no time can the Organization have sovereignty or other rights over Palestine. Therefore, the United Nations has no right to decide the partition of Palestine or to allocate any part of its territory to religious minorities of foreign immigrants in order to establish their own country. The United Nations cannot give up what does not belong to it. Member States of the United Nations cannot separate, weaken or damage the sovereignty of the Palestinian people, dispose of their territory at will, or undermine the territorial integrity of their country through partition. " (The Biography of Arafat, page 49) However, Israel is not satisfied with the fact that the United Nations has allocated them most Palestinian land and most excellent land. 1948 after the founding of the people's Republic of China, Israel occupied the whole of Palestine through several wars of aggression (a very small part has now been returned to the Palestinian side).
Now, the United States-led West often demands that Palestine first recognize Israel's right to exist or impose sanctions on the Palestinian side. If the United States and Europe really care about the human rights of Jews and really repent for your long-term persecution of Jews, you and Europe should assume the responsibility of persecuting Jews and allocate some land in their own countries to resettle Jews. But if the United States and Europe don't do this, Palestinians who have nothing to do with anti-semitism should bear the responsibility for anti-semitism in Europe and America-the United States and Europe forcibly allocated most of the Palestinian land to settle Jews, which led to the displacement of the majority of Palestinians. It is unreasonable for the United States and Europe to atone for the previous anti-Semitic history and "let another nation suffer great injustice for it". Looking at it from another angle, I would like to ask, why should the invaded (Palestine) recognize the right of the invader (Israel) to exist in the occupied territory, instead of the invader first recognizing the right of the invaded and returning the occupied territory? Just as Germany and Japan invaded the territories of many countries in Europe and Asia before and during World War II, they must first recognize the rights of the invaded countries and withdraw from the occupied countries; Or should the invaded country first recognize the right of Germany and Japan to occupy land? Therefore, no matter from which point of view, the demands of the West led by the United States on the Palestinian side are unreasonable. The United States, which usually shouts "human rights", insists on this unreasonable power policy that seriously damages the rights of Palestinians and serves its narrow self-interest in the Middle East. British scholar Hart wrote, "The State of Israel was founded by Britain. Perhaps it was because the United States and some big countries realized that the existence of Israel was the most reliable guarantee for the weak and divided Arab countries to successfully challenge the control and exploitation of resources and strategic materials in this region by big countries. It is for this reason that Palestinians are regarded as victims. Their real sin is to refuse to disappear from the earth. " (Biography of Arafat, page 53)