Debate about data arrangement.
Hello, Madam President. Around today's debate, our view is that chicken soup for the soul has no nutrition.
First of all, chicken soup for the soul refers to catering to each other's words in order to appease their negative emotions from the beginning. It is a personal subjective need, which is blind, one-sided, irrational and inflammatory.
The concept of nutrition in biology is the basis of maintaining the operation of the body, which has universal significance and is the objective need of people's growth and progress, so that people can obtain substantial growth and progress.
Next, I will demonstrate our point of view from the following two aspects. First, the chicken soup for the soul now gives us a relaxed and happy mood on the surface, but actually weakens the difficulties we encounter in the current environment, which is a constant self-paralysis.
People in the trough like to listen to some empty chicken soup slogans. After listening to chicken soup, they just put forward some ideas for a short time but didn't start to implement them, that is, they didn't change the status quo. Just like the sentence summed up on the Internet: "Indirectly pursue lofty aspirations and keep eating and waiting for death".
Chicken soup for the soul only depicts the beauty of Rome for us, but it doesn't tell us how to get to Rome, and it can't make people realize the root of the problem, that is, it has no practical guiding significance. Although chicken soup for the soul will temporarily relieve our depressed mood, ignoring the gap between reality and story and individual differences will mislead people, even after watching chicken soup for the soul.
We will gradually turn into chicken soup-style thinking, indulge in the blind encouragement of chicken soup to the soul, and make our unrealistic and beautiful fantasies become arrogant. There is a thin line between real inspiration and chicken soup for the soul. Real inspiration not only gives us spiritual comfort, but also gives us the correct way to solve the current problem.
Second, chicken soup for the soul is only what people want subjectively, but not objectively. Subjectively, all they want is the sense of identity they yearn for, which is blind and unscientific. What they need objectively is the foundation of physical and mental health and nutrition to maintain physical and mental activities. Just like eating junk snacks, it only satisfies our appetite, which is what we subjectively want.
However, eating junk snacks will not only make the body grow taller, but may even affect various functions of the body. This is not a nutritional analogy that we need objectively. From the perspective of emotional analogy, chicken soup for the soul can only arouse people's emotions in a specific period. There is no objective solution to the problem, and there is no scientific certification and authoritative data support.
This is just a gorgeous bubble. To sum up, we can't deny that chicken soup for the soul is good for some people in some cases, but the benefits are not equal to nutrition, such as drugs for depression, which can alleviate the symptoms of patients with depression.
But are antidepressants nutritious? It is understandable to look at the chicken soup for the soul when life is difficult, but it cannot be based on the chicken soup for the soul. Chicken soup for the soul can't solve your dilemma. Therefore, we insist that chicken soup for the soul has no nutrition.
23 collation of debate materials.
1, chicken soup for the soul is to cater to people's thinking, say what they want to hear, and sometimes even give up some truth, right? Please answer yes or no.
(no).
As the old saying goes, "It never rains but it pours", but chicken soup is euphemistic, "God closes a door for you, but at the same time opens a window". How to explain this example?
To encourage and comfort you.
Yes, in order to encourage and comfort you, even ignore the truth, is such a lie nutritious?
Let me ask again, will such blind encouragement paralyze the audience and make them lose the opportunity to reflect on themselves? (no).
Please explain in detail why this will not happen.
Give you encouragement and guidance.
But such a thing will make you blindly confident because you ignore the objective resistance in reality.
Nutrition is necessary for our survival and development. Is that chicken soup? Please answer yes or no (yes).
You mean you can't live without chicken soup, right? Humans are too fragile. /(not).
Yes, chicken soup is not a necessity for our survival and development, so chicken soup has no nutrition.
If you answer chicken soup, you can relieve stress.
Chicken soup can only relieve stress, but the fact is that people can still survive under pressure and may even perform better under pressure.
Sort out the data of four debates.
The other party defines no nutrition indefinitely, so that they don't mention anything without nutrition, because according to his context, it has a specific function and nutrition for a specific group of people in a specific situation and at a specific time. Then what else in the world is not like this? The other debater just told us that chicken soup for the soul makes sense.
Existence is reasonable, and existence is demand. But the question is, where is nutrition proved? You can't define non-nutrition. Aren't you erasing all the non-nutrients in the definition? Debate is nutritious, and it should have universal benefits. You just said that his mood will change from low to high, but this is called useful, not good.
To sum up, we can obviously find that chicken soup is like erotic massage, you can press it wherever you feel comfortable. And dry goods are like regular massage. If you feel uncomfortable, just press it.
The essence of chicken soup is not to make sense, but to make you happy. However, does happiness mean nutrition?
When faced with problems, they just adjust their mentality. This is not positive energy at all, but obscenity and negativity. What they put on is a kind of "Ah Q spirit". How active can people who convince themselves and others with spiritual victory be? A truly positive outlook on life is to face up to problems, solve them, and give up if they cannot be solved.
Accept what you should accept, don't give in to it, and then consider other effective methods. This is the real positive energy. Isn't it best for everyone to make a Q if we don't solve it? What is really nutritious for society and each of us can help and guide us.
When facing a problem, the first thing to do is to stabilize one's emotions and rationally analyze the key to the problem, instead of further amplifying one's emotions and focusing on one's emotions, so as to turn negative emotions into positive ones. This will only make these emotional people pay more attention to their emotions instead of solving problems the next time they encounter problems.
This is just a figurative meaning. Today, we are discussing whether chicken soup for the soul is nutritious, but in fact, we are discussing whether the truth contained in these words is helpful. Because in real life, we say that bananas are nutritious, and I hope everyone will eat more. The Tao Te Ching is nutritious.
We hope everyone will read more books. When we define something in life as nutritious but not nutritious, it actually has an inner meaning. Should everyone be encouraged to see it? Should everyone be encouraged to eat? Should everyone be encouraged to read it? We have our own concerns, but can we really solve them?
Everyone here, frankly speaking, we are all lazy, so we often watch chicken soup for the soul because we don't want to face problems. But we tell you that chicken soup for the soul has no nutrition. We want to tell you that although sometimes we are lazy and sometimes we want to escape, we should not paralyze ourselves with chicken soup for the soul, comfort ourselves and constantly simplify ourselves. This is the biggest joke.
1, self-paralysis Just pandering to your thinking, saying what you want to hear, without practical guiding significance and the root of the problem, blindly indulging in it, with high eyes and low hands. A debate.
2. Non-objective demand cannot solve the dilemma. Often it may be shortcomings, supplement examples and avoid real problems. People in a bad mood often encounter various problems, just like physical pain, depression and unhappiness are often an early warning mechanism. What is really needed is to find the crux of the problem from this depression, with examples. ) a debate.
3. Blind and irrational guidance. Chicken soup for the soul doesn't know everyone's specific situation, but it has to undertake the sacred mission of soothing people's hearts and transmitting positive energy, which determines that its characteristics must be simple and easy to understand, catering to everyone's emotions.
It is easy to form a * * sound, which brings people a sense of security. When you trust chicken soup, you often forget that there is a big gap between the story he tells you and the reality, so the truth he gives is often misleading, not guiding your behavior.
The reality is very complicated, and chicken soup for the soul ignores other factors in reality, which is harmful to guidance. It reduces our motivation to solve problems, makes us blindly confident, and even makes us believe in a guide that is completely out of line with our situation.
4. Simplify thinking. Instead of perfecting the thinking of the rich and forming a kidnapping of thinking patterns. People's weaknesses tend to simplify the problems they encounter. We need to know more about the world and ourselves. When we get used to this mode of thinking, we will have a deeper understanding of the world and ourselves. Clear positioning, chicken soup for the soul will have disadvantages rather than benefits.
5. Anti-chicken soup is more reasonable than chicken soup. God closed a door, but it opened a window for me. But it is more reasonable for God to close a door and release a dog at the same time.
6. The difference between useful and nutritious: If something is only useful to a specific group of people under special circumstances, it cannot be called nutritious. Nutrition is like apples and bananas. Although 100% people cannot be required to eat it logically, it is beneficial to everyone under non-special circumstances. One thing should have universal benefits.
PS: supplementary information
Four deadly sins of chicken soup: untrue, ugly, paranoid and trespassing.
Canfield deserves to be the originator of chicken soup. The early and late stages of his life's creation just represent two basic types of "chicken soup prose": psychological comfort type and inspiring struggle type. In terms of expression, he also shaped the basic stylistic features of Chicken Soup: sensational storytelling and excessive interpretation. Looking at these two types and characteristics comprehensively, we can sum up the abominations of "chicken soup":
One is "unreal". The most typical thing is to attach a vulgar story to a celebrity. Washington, Einstein, Su Dongpo and Jackson are all "hardest hit areas".
Another is to make up stories according to fixed routines, regardless of reason and common sense. For example, the article "Get rid of any suspicious thoughts" wrote that three frogs fell into the milk bucket, and the first one resigned and died directly; The second thought about his ability carefully, and when he felt that it was not working, he sank; The third kept kicking and encouraging himself, and finally stirred the milk into cream and jumped out.
The second is "not beautiful." "Chicken soup" usually has neither internal beauty nor external beauty, and it is too lazy to decorate it. Therefore, we often read such a sentence: "Hua Song won pieces of jade in countless wars." Their description is about this level.
The third is "paranoia", that is, over-interpretation and taking special cases as common sense. For example, someone wrote that a worker wanted to be a writer and wrote day and night, but his manuscript was always rejected. When he was depressed, he threw it into the trash can, and his wife picked it up from the trash can to encourage him to continue writing, which became an instant hit. This man's name is Stephen King.
In most cases, such writing will only accomplish nothing. This is the essence of inspirational stories, because any choice is only a special case, not common sense.
Therefore, from the "chicken soup text", we can neither learn solid historical knowledge and real life experience, nor feel beautiful words, nor gain real wisdom. In the United States, "chicken soup" is just a consumer product. In China, "chicken soup" has become an educational reading for learning English, and even a part of enlightenment discourse, which is "illegal invasion". In a word, "untrue", "ugly", "paranoid" and "trespassing" are the four abominations of China's "chicken soup prose".
Therefore, if ordinary people believe in chicken soup, they will have a high degree of emotional identity. After all, they have made it clear that they have been pressing their feelings for a long time. However, their relationship is always up in the air, because the problem is still unresolved. Finally, they will sum up their behavior in one sentence: I am procrastinating.
That's why I hate chicken soup: they always choose some emotional people to cheat. These people are already in a period of emotional fluctuation, and one person is emotionally unstable. If you are an ordinary chicken soup writer, you will only lie down for a while. Meeting some so-called experts may change readers' outlook on life and values and delay their lives. Pay attention to criticism.