Any success will not happen overnight. A person, a group, a nation and a country must constantly understand and learn if they want to grow and develop.

If you don't understand, you won't. You must understand and learn. Learning is to better adapt to the new development. Confucius said, "Learning is not enough." That's the truth.

Marx said: "Things always change and develop." For example, genetic variation, or aquatic development to terrestrial and so on. In this process, those who adapt to the environment will survive, and those who do not adapt to the environment will naturally be eliminated. The same is true of people living in society. When they were born, they slowly learned to walk and talk. When they grow up, they come into contact with all kinds of things and learn a lot, such as dealing with daily things and interpersonal relationships. Some people are considerate and good at learning, so they can cope freely in various environments. Some people are complacent and lazy to understand and learn, and as a result, they are at a loss and abandoned by the times and society. Such examples are not uncommon, too numerous to mention.

If we have a high level of knowledge now, can we still rest assured of the status quo? If there is such an idea, it is undoubtedly wrong. Confucius is a master of wisdom, but he still insists on learning. His "threesome, there must be my teacher" is a portrayal of his actions! If not, can Confucius stand out from a hundred schools and become the founder of Confucianism? Although Li Changgao, the first person in the contemporary Weiqi field, has reached the supreme position, he is still not satisfied and is still studying Weiqi tirelessly. No wonder his dominance is as stable as Mount Tai. On the contrary, Zhong Yong, a prodigy in Wang Anshi's works, was regarded by his father as a cash cow instead of continuing his studies, and later became "indifferent to anyone". Therefore, if people can keep learning and making progress like Confucius and Li Changgao, they will be ahead of others and be invincible!

If you want to succeed, you must constantly understand and learn. One person is like this, so is a nation and a country. Take the lead in political reform, make Qin strong and "seize the West River"; Zhao Wuling's riding and shooting in Khufu made other countries dare not underestimate; There is also the king of Chu who "flies if you don't fly, soars into the sky if you don't sing, and is a blockbuster". It was he who faced up to the reality and made great efforts to make Chu stand out! Now, we are carrying out socialist construction, and we need constant understanding, study and progress in order to truly enrich the people and strengthen the country!

"there is no end to learning", whether you are a young man who has never been involved in the world or an experienced elder; No matter whether you have no knowledge or are knowledgeable and talented, you need to constantly understand and learn!

2. There is no end to learning

Zhuangzi once said, "My life is limited, and so is my knowledge." Translated into modern Chinese, this sentence means "our life is limited, but our knowledge is infinite." I think what Zhuangzi said is very good. A person begins to study, eat, walk and learn culture when he is young, but he still has a lot to learn until he dies, so he can only die with regret. So for us, knowledge is bigger than the universe, boundless and endless.

Some people say that since there is too much knowledge to learn, why should we pursue it desperately? Eat, drink, and be content, isn't it? Of course, this idea is wrong. If people don't study and work, what's the difference between them and animals? In fact, he is even worse than an animal! Because even animals have to hunt by themselves, experience by themselves and study hard. Therefore, as a person, we must not be lazy. Only by constantly learning and making progress is the best way to live.

Since knowledge is infinite and everyone's knowledge is limited, we should admit our own shortcomings and never pretend to understand, because that will only harm ourselves. As the saying goes, "a full bottle of water is safe and steady, and half a bottle of water is shaky", which is why people who admit their shortcomings are more modest, while self-righteous people should brag and show off. Confucius said, "Knowing is knowing, not knowing is not knowing, but knowing." This is the real seeking truth from facts, the real smart.

Knowing the difficulty and long-term nature of learning, don't rush for success. As the saying goes, "It's never too old to learn", we should persist in studying all our lives, step by step, step by step. We should be good at learning. Learning "wide" is not as good as learning "fine". Too many things are easy to be confused and even confused with each other; If you are single-minded, what you have learned will be clearer and more systematically stored in your mind.

In short, we should study hard, although there is no end to learning.

3. Argumentative training

1

Recommend to talk about patriotism (a record of composition evaluation)

First of all, we must determine an argument angle.

This is a topic, first of all, we must determine the argument (viewpoint). Only in this way can we consider this argument. Views can be a general praise of patriotism or behavior, which is easy to write, but it is impossible to write with depth and strength, and it is difficult to get high marks in the article; You can also determine your point of view from a specific angle, such as "patriotism needs national pride () national integrity", "patriotism is not only a slogan, but also a practical action" and "patriotism can be reflected in the most ordinary work". The purpose of determining the angle is to make the argument more concentrated and the point of view more specific. Specific and concentrated arguments are often more powerful and in-depth than generalities, and the quality of articles is easier to improve. When writing any topic, you should first consider determining an argument (point of view), and you must first establish an angle to clarify your point of view. For example, on the topic of "talking about modesty", we can demonstrate the view that "modesty can make people progress" from the perspective of "modesty"; You can also demonstrate "don't be modest in everything" from the perspective of "being brave in expressing yourself". Wu Han's Talk about Modesty demonstrates from the perspective of modesty that "modesty is beneficial and all bets are off".

There are the following problems in the angle and viewpoint of this composition: there is no angle at all. More than a dozen students randomly classified people from different angles, including Deng Shichang, Five Heroes (who died for their country), Wen Tianxiang, Su Wu, Mei Lanfang (national pride and national integrity), Qian Xuesen, Hua (who is not too ugly to be a mother), women's volleyball team, and athletes (who win honor for our country). The ultimate goal is that we should learn from them and cultivate patriotism. It's not impossible to write like this, but it's just general, without depth, and the argument materials are chaotic, giving people a sense of confusion. The level of this composition is not high, and there will definitely be no high marks. Fan students with this problem, in addition to messy materials, unfocused and unclear topics, often have the following symptoms:

1, the opening paragraph (how to introduce it is beyond my control) often doesn't point out the point that is not specific enough at all, but at the end of the article, I have a half face and a shy flash. The teacher who reads this book will be furious. We advocate cutting to the chase, which is not stereotyped writing. We should be careful of this ideographic need. Later, I estimated that students with this symptom might have no idea what they were demonstrating. This is huge. (The importance of the first paragraph; ) taboo.

There is a point at the beginning, and the angle is very specific and the point of view is very clear. At first glance, the teacher is very happy. When you look down, most of the materials you use are disorganized and unclassified, and most of them can't demonstrate this specific and clear point of view. The teacher is in great pain. The root of the problem is still confusion of thinking and no sense of category. I don't know which materials can demonstrate opinions and which materials can't.

3. Some students come straight to the point and put forward their own arguments. Materials can also demonstrate opinions, but in the end, they can be comprehensively demonstrated, and the foothold is greatly deviated. For example, the argument is: show patriotism in ordinary posts, but at the end say that you are patriotic, but don't blindly exclude others, but be good at absorbing advanced foreign things. The most regrettable thing is that there is such a deviation at the end, and it is still chaotic (local).

4. Some students used different angles and categories of materials in the process of argumentation, and they made it very clear and accurate in classification and arrangement. Of course, other people's views are impeccable, and people will say: I am demonstrating that patriotism has different ways in different historical periods and under different conditions. There are two bombs here: first, what's the use of discussing the change of patriotic style? The thesis is to educate (educate) people through reasoning. What do you want to do by educating people like this? The second is: you want to say it from many angles. Can you explain it clearly?

Second, these problems appear in the process of argumentation:

1, light will list materials without analysis, how can this be called argument? Analyze what? How to analyze it? These are the keys to the argument. This point must be clarified. If you just put one or several stories there, how can people know your heart?

2, the material itself has a lot of problems, which greatly affects the demonstration and even destroys the demonstration effect. For example, many of our students use the examples of Wang and Chen Xitong to prove unpatriotic. In fact, Wang He and Chen Xitong are not patriotic at all. Their problem is not patriotism at all, but another problem that has nothing to do with patriotism. (X Chinese, xx) Fabricated facts and materials have also greatly affected the effectiveness of the argument.

3. In the process of argumentation, consider an example material in detail. Are you telling a story to the teacher? A 600-word article tells a story about Wen Tianxiang and Su Wu in only 200 words. How do you live this life? In the final analysis, it is unclear (incomprehensible) what is the difference between the narrative in the argumentative essay and the narrative in the narrative. Basic knowledge and kung fu are so poor that it is no longer a basic problem. I'm afraid it has something to do with your brain capacity.

4. There are too many natural paragraphs, especially in argumentative essays. Forty words are one paragraph after another, so dense that you don't see if you can put them together to make the structure more compact and complete. In fact, this is still an argument! The old problem of too many or too few natural paragraphs (* * * three paragraphs) is not easy to get rid of. You must use your brain first.

Third, the writing format has been pointed out many times. It's your own problem when you can change it. Some students are afraid that they will never change.

Fourth, write an amendment to this composition.

Students who think there are many problems should rewrite them.

This kind of revision is very important and an important link to improve the composition.

Conclusion: This lecture and evaluation course is a training scheme for argumentative writing this semester, and the problems focus on the above aspects. The next composition focuses on the outstanding contradictions of students, and individual problems are solved individually.