First of all, talk about the national conditions. China is now at the critical stage of developing domestic alternative technologies, which requires a large amount of R&D investment. Where does the R&D investment come from? It depends not only on government investment, but also on a virtuous circle in which enterprises reinvest through production and sales. Apple Tesla is in a key position in the industrial chain, which can provide a large number of orders for domestic upstream enterprises every year and promote domestic reproduction investment.
And at present, our scientific and technological level can't be completely perfect. For driverless and new energy vehicles, Tesla has mastered relatively advanced driverless technology. The level of driverless driving in China is still at L3 level, and Tesla has begun to prepare to break through L5. If Tesla's business in China is forcibly divested, it will not only make the suppliers in the upstream of the new energy automobile industry chain lose a big customer, resulting in a lot of blood loss, but also hinder the progress and development of driverless technology in China and drag down the overall layout of driverless driving in China.
The arrival of Apple and Tesla in China has also brought a lot of jobs to China, which has promoted the economic development level of China. The increasing demand for Tesla, Apple and other high-tech products not only promoted the consumption upgrade, but also promoted the development of domestic upstream suppliers, which brought a lot of economic benefits to China enterprises, promoted domestic reproduction and improved the level of domestic production development. Not only that, but also meet the country's demand for high-quality products and improve the living standards of residents.
Forced divestiture of Apple and Tesla will result in the loss of a large number of jobs and unemployment of workers in China, which will increase the pressure of social governance. In addition, it will also cause a large number of shrinking orders of Chinese enterprises, increase the operating pressure of enterprises, bankrupt individual small enterprises, and hinder the reproduction of enterprises, thus hindering China's economic development. These are all things we don't want to see.
China's economic development needs to move forward steadily step by step, instead of adopting a one-size-fits-all model, which not only harms the rights and interests of consumers, but also harms the interests of upstream manufacturers. For foreign countries, it will also hurt the confidence of foreign-funded enterprises to set up factories in the mainland, which is not conducive to China's implementation of the development strategic goal of going abroad and introducing.
Our cooperation with foreign high-quality high-tech enterprises such as Tesla Apple should be mutually beneficial and win-win. We should constantly develop experience in cooperation, improve the level of scientific and technological development, and promote China enterprises to go abroad in cooperation. In the process of development, we will constantly make up for our shortcomings, give full play to our advantages, and take a long-term and stable development route. Improving the confidence of foreign-funded enterprises in China will also make the country's GDP grow steadily.