The opinions in the court debate are the opinions expressed by both the prosecution and the defense on the evidence and the case, focusing on whether the criminal facts can be ascertained, whether the defendant has committed a criminal act, whether he should bear criminal responsibility, and what kind of criminal responsibility he should bear, as well as the further opinions of the two sides on the focus of the debate on the basis of court investigation and full expression of their opinions on the probative force of the whole criminal facts, circumstances and various evidences.

Mainly for the defense of the other side's point of view, the arguments were recorded during the trial. In short, what the two sides said in court, these are the opinions of the court debate.

Extended data:

The order of court debate:

1, the plaintiff and his agent ad litem spoke.

After the presiding judge announces to enter the court debate stage, the plaintiff will first state his opinions on the facts, evidence and applicable laws investigated by the court. After the plaintiff's statement, if the plaintiff has an agent, his agent will supplement or further explain the plaintiff's statement in order to better safeguard the plaintiff's legitimate rights and interests. If the plaintiff does not appear in court, his agent ad litem may speak.

2, the defendant and his agent ad litem reply

After the plaintiff and his agent ad litem have finished speaking, the defendant shall speak on the facts, evidence and applicable laws investigated by the court, and defend the plaintiff's speech. If the defendant has an agent ad litem, after the defendant has finished speaking, his agent ad litem will supplement or further explain the defendant's speech in order to better safeguard the defendant's legitimate rights and interests. If the defendant does not appear in court, his agent ad litem may speak in defense.

3, the third person and his agent ad litem to speak or reply.

If a third party participates in a lawsuit, after the defendant or defendant has made a statement or defense, the court shall ask the third party to make a statement or defense, and let it put forward its own opinions on the facts and evidence investigated by the court, the applicable law and the defendant and the defendant's statements and defense. If a third party has an agent ad litem, he may speak or reply by his agent ad litem.

Step 4 debate with each other

After the above-mentioned court debate sequence is over, the judge shall ask both parties and the third party to ask each other questions about the case, refute each other's claims and explain their opinions. When the parties argue with each other, the judge should focus on the problems that must be solved in the case, enlighten and guide the parties when necessary, and the judge must fairly protect the rights of the parties to debate. The parties shall not abuse their right to debate, argue unreasonably, quarrel with each other or even make trouble.

References:

Baidu encyclopedia-court debate