Internet companies are very? Burning money? Yes In order to seize market share, they had to drive like crazy? Rob someone? In order to attract potential users enough, we must give them enough preferential policies. So, they just need to move on? Burning money? The way to continuously expand their user range and market share. But this situation is not a normal market environment after all, this kind? Deformity? The new preemption model will also make the overall market out of balance, but many internet companies can't manage that much, can they? Kill red eye? , who can in the shortest time? Burn? Whoever loses the most money is likely to win the consumer market in the fastest time.

And those small internet companies that can't afford to burn money are also losing ground and eventually disappearing into the torrent of history. After all, are these all so-called things? Capital market? We can't allow monopoly to happen, because once an industry is monopolized by a company, the consequences will be unimaginable. The whole industry will gradually become unbalanced and out of control. Monopoly enterprises may infringe on consumers' rights and interests step by step for their own benefit, eating into the whole market. So now the relevant departments are also right? Burning money? Our marketing model has opened up strict supervision, and any company that tries to break the market rules will be severely punished.

What we need is a fair, just, harmonious and clear overall market environment. The marketing of burning money really benefits consumers in the short term, but in the long run, consumers are like lambs to be slaughtered and can only be passively eaten by these companies. Therefore, the healthy competition among internet companies is understandable, but if the bottom line is lost, it will become a very terrible thing. The market will gradually get out of control and may inevitably die out, which is what everyone does not want to see.