Group A: France, South Africa

Analysis: France is strong, the youth training system is good, and the group is the first. South Africa has the advantage of home court, and the Confederations Cup is also very good, so it should have a good performance.

Group B: Argentina, Nigeria

Argentina has many young superstars and perfect frontcourt strength. Although other teams are strong teams, it should not affect Argentina's first qualifying. Nigeria and South Africa are both African teams, occupying some home advantage, and won the silver medal in Beijing Olympic Games. The youth training is very good, so the qualifying situation is good. Although Korea and Greece have created brilliant achievements, the main players are older and easily crushed by injuries, so they are not optimistic.

Group C: Britain and the United States

Analysis: The situation of this group is the most obvious, and the luxury of the English lineup ranks among the top 32. The United States has a perfect head coach, and the Confederations Cup has achieved remarkable results, ranking first in North America and with fierce momentum. The other two dark horses are not good enough.

Group D: Germany, Serbia

Analysis: Ramstein's cup performance has always been excellent and stable, and the age composition in the lineup is very reasonable. There are veterans like Ballack and Klose, Mesozoic players like Ram and Podolski, and many outstanding young players who won the first place in the group. The situation in Serbia is similar to that in Germany, and it is very stable. France was almost eliminated in the qualifiers, and the qualifying problem was not big. Ghana and Australia are similar in strength, but it is difficult to qualify.

Group e: Netherlands, Japan

The Netherlands performed very well in last year's European Cup and qualifiers, with a strong midfield lineup, but the front line did not score well. Japan has always been the leader of Asian football, and Endo's guarantor, Mr. Asia, has good strength and may be the first in the impact group. Although Denmark and Cameroon are also strong teams, considering that Denmark is a Nordic team, it is not suitable for the climate in South Africa. However, Cameroon has been in a general state recently, relying too much on Eto 'o, and its overall strength is not as good as that of Japan, so it is difficult for both teams to qualify. On the whole, the strength of this group is the most average and the variables are the biggest.

Group F: Italy, Slovakia

The overall strength of this group is the worst, and Italy has won the contract. There should be no suspense for the defending champion group. The other three teams and Paraguay all achieved good results in the qualifiers. Although they have a good player like Santa Cruz, their comprehensive strength is average. New Zealand, which is inferior to China in strength, is recognized as a fishbone. Although Bahrain was unexpectedly eliminated in the qualifiers, its overall strength is still the worst among the top 32. On the whole, Slovakia, which has many powerful players such as K and Hamsik, has the largest qualifying rate.

Group G: Brazil, Portugal/C? te d 'Ivoire

Analysis: This group is recognized as the death group, and three strong teams from Brazil, Portugal and C? te d 'Ivoire have been assigned to one group. Brazil, the champion of the mid-term and new science union cup, is stronger and has little problem in qualifying; Portugal and C? te d 'Ivoire are equal in strength, both have a world-class superstar, and many world-class stars are at the bottom. On the whole, Portugal is slightly stronger, but C? te d 'Ivoire is located in Africa, and the two teams are likely to win by goal difference.

Group H: Spain, Honduras

Analysis: The qualifying situation of this group is also unclear. Apart from Spain, Honduras, Chile and Switzerland are equally powerful. Among them, the Swiss national junior team has just won the world junior championship. Chile's qualifying performance is outstanding; Honduran not only has many powerful players who play for the Super League, but also many world-class stars, such as Pa Wen and suazo. Therefore, I prefer Honduras to qualify, expecting cavallero, Martinez and Ramirez to perform well on behalf of the Super League!

Top 8

France won against Nigeria.

Analysis: Although there are big names such as Ribelli and Benzema in Ligue 1, the overall strength of the two teams is equal, and Domenech's poor coaching is very likely to be misled and self-defeating; Nigeria has a semi-home advantage and adapts to local conditions. This changes, so Nigeria is very likely to let France lose in the previous 16.

South Africa won against Argentina.

Analysis: A game is not without suspense. First, the home of the World Cup has always been strong: the last Germany, O2 Korea. Another point is that diego maradona's wayward attitude is likely to overturn Argentine sewers: the Bolivian fiasco is a good example. However, the strength gap between the two teams is huge, and the probability of such an accident is still very small. The problem of winning the Blue and White Army should not be great.

England VS Serbia England wins.

Analysis: England's overall strength is dominant, but Eastern European teams have always been good at fierce fighting, so England can't easily advance. But overall, the Three Lions Corps is still better than its rivals, especially after Capello came. Not only established a new style of play at the tactical level, but also creatively combined Lampard and Gerrard. More importantly, its management style of running the army with an iron fist has given England a brand-new look and made the team more cohesive. So it shouldn't be a problem for England to win Serbia.

America VS Germany? Germany won.

Analysis: This is a head-on confrontation. Both teams are powerful teams, and long pass will be the keynote of this game. The coaches of both teams are very talented, have led the team for many years and know their own abilities very well. However, Germany has many world superstars and experienced veterans. As an established power, Germany is also full of profound knowledge. None of these are available in America. More importantly, even if rammstein's score falls behind, their strong willpower is likely to help them overtake the score and win.

Netherlands VS Slovakia Netherlands wins

Analysis: Slovakia and Serbia belong to Eastern Europe, with similar styles of play, both of which are strength-oriented. Holland is a typical technical football style with luxurious midfield configuration, and it is also one of the few teams that can compete with English and Spanish teams in midfield. Therefore, the Orange Legion can rely on strong midfield cohesion and control to grasp the rhythm of the game, and then rely on the sharp breakthrough of the flank to create opportunities, supplemented by set-pieces tactics, and finally win the game. So the probability of a big score in this game is very high.

Japan won against Italy. Italy won

Analysis: Italy's signing is really good. I have never met any strong enemy, but Japan is not easy to deal with. Italy seems to be very worried about Asian teams in the World Cup: it was almost eliminated by Australia in the last World Cup, defeated by South Korea in 2002, and 1966 was defeated by North Korea to kill ................................................................................... But then again, although Italy faces many problems, such as aging, injuries and so on, there is no doubt about the strength of defending champions. More importantly, the passive play advocated by Italy has hampered the creativity of Japanese midfielders, so the Azzurri should appear in the top 8 list of the World Cup.

Brazil VS Honduras Brazil wins.

Analysis: Brazil ranks in the top three of the top 32, and is also the champion of the new science and technology joint cup. There are several big names at the bottom of the array, which is very overbearing. By contrast, Honduran star Suazo and cavallero are so "worthless" ... but football is.