(1) What problems did the results of this study explain, what laws were drawn, and what theoretical or practical problems were solved; To summarize the innovative content of the paper, the wording should be accurate and rigorous, and it should not be ambiguous or ambiguous. Don't use words like "probably", "probably" and "probably", so as not to make people feel specious and doubt the true value of the paper.

(2) What tests have been made on the previous views on related issues, which are consistent with the results of this study and which are inconsistent, and what amendments, supplements, developments or negatives have been made by the author.

(3) The shortcomings or problems left by this study. If there are any exceptions or problems that are difficult to explain or solve in this paper, some suggestions can be made for further research on this topic. Conclusion The paragraphs are relatively independent and should provide clear and specific qualitative and quantitative information. The main points should be expressed concretely, not in abstract and general language. Readability is strong, for example, generally do not use symbols, use names. Write briefly, don't have more discussion, and don't simply repeat the abstract of each paragraph in the paper.

(The above content comes from the Academic Hall)