Individual bad discipline may cause some restrictions on students, but the possibility of inferiority can't hide the inevitability of superiority. For example, someone was killed by driving, but you can't say that driving is a bad thing. So in general, discipline promotes the development of personality.
Objection: Put your hands behind your back, put your legs together and sit up straight. All actions are unnecessary except the actions such as raising your hand to speak, taking a book and writing, which are stipulated by the teacher. The other person mentioned driving, which is not a subject at all!
Party 1: the army is United and does not approve of developing individuality! Therefore, the army should use strict discipline to restrict the development of human nature! Discipline will imprison people's thoughts, affect people's thinking space and imagination, and make people's personality not develop best! Then I want to ask the other party, where is the subject you said will promote the development of personality?
Hello, everyone, I'm the opposing four arguments. First of all, I want to point out that in the debate just now, the other side made several mistakes.
On the second level, the other party's point of view only emphasizes the importance of discipline, but does not explain that discipline will promote the development of personality.
When defining personality, it is a relatively fixed feature, so can discipline still affect personality? Moreover, what the other party is arguing about is not "advocating" at all, but "norms" and "advocating individuality in the mainstream ideology of society".
The other party said on the fourth floor: self-discipline, more accurately, self-discipline. According to the meaning of the other party, the concepts of self-discipline and discipline are the same, so what explanation does the other party have for the definition of discipline?
Also, in the free debate stage in the first half, the other party never mentioned "how discipline promotes personality development".
China culture skillfully divides "I" into "ego" and "I" appearing in a role. Praise the role of "I" and stifle people's own "self". Attaching importance to role education and neglecting the education of people themselves will inevitably lead to the discipline of attaching importance to personality, obligations and rights, obedience and autonomy, and external discipline and neglecting internal initiative. By analogy, the education of imbalance between yin and yang is also unhealthy.
People whose personality is suppressed, so that their personality can not be fully and healthily developed, dare not be "the best in the world", and will only do what others have done, but will not do what others have not done. Without individuality, there is no uniqueness. Without uniqueness, how can there be another way of creativity? ! How terrible it is for a nation to suppress its own personality and form habits. How does this nation innovate? And discipline will greatly limit the development of personality.
Is discipline really that important? In my opinion, schools need to have a certain degree of discipline, and students also need to have a certain degree of discipline, but too much emphasis on discipline will inevitably stifle students' vivid personality and lively nature, and will inevitably bind students' thinking space and imagination. Can teachers be generous and open-minded in class? Can you give students a more free space? Can you give students a little flexibility and autonomy in words and deeds? Are children allowed not to sit up straight? Another example is: can students who have mastered it learn extracurricular content?
The 1990s was an era that lacked innovation and individuality. If placed in the long river of history, perhaps this decade is the least characteristic decade in the second half of this century, and it is also the least memorable decade. The cultural spirit of the 1990s was crushed by a superficial slogan and measures to stabilize everything, and became a shallow and short-lived commercial culture and political culture. In this era, there is no innovation, no individuality, no flowers of thought and no cultural competition.
This can't help but remind people of the recent 1980s. Spiritually, that era was pure and culturally diverse. The culture of that era was full of rebellion, creativity and flexibility. On the one hand, it wants to completely destroy all the remnants of the Holocaust era, and on the other hand, it wants to create a cultural framework that can restore diversity. People in the 1980s were full of indomitable enthusiasm for participating in society, and at the same time, they were full of introspection for the country and mankind. Under this premise, this era is full of scientific, economic and cultural revival and prosperity.
Microsoft put forward the "Friday" working method, that is, employees can wear clothes that suit their personality instead of suits, because psychologists have found through research that wearing uniforms at work will affect work efficiency! So everyone's personality can be well developed.
After discovering the feasibility of drawing regular 17 polygons, Gauss gave up his ambition of focusing on linguistics. After comparing his intuitive abilities, Einstein judged that his physical intuition was stronger and devoted himself to physics. Hua discovered his interest in mathematics; Husserl felt that although he got a doctorate in mathematics, he felt it necessary to engage in philosophy ... What would happen if he was disturbed by the outside world (others and objects) without their free experience and free judgment on his own development?
Therefore, we believe that discipline will limit the development of personality!
The explanation of discipline in Ci Hai is that discipline refers to the rules of conduct that require people to abide by the established order, execute orders and perform their duties.
What is discipline? Interpretation of Ci Hai: "Discipline refers to the rules of conduct that require people to abide by the established order, execute orders and perform their duties." For an organization, discipline, like rules and regulations, is a binding behavior.
Before expounding our views, let's make clear the definitions of "discipline" and "personality development".
The so-called discipline refers to the rules and regulations formulated by political parties, organs, troops, organizations and enterprises in order to safeguard the collective interests and ensure the normal work, and requires every member to abide by them. The development of personality includes the development of people's ability, the development of social relations and the improvement and perfection of certain qualities. , mainly manifested in the development of human uniqueness and human autonomy (human autonomy as the main body of activities is mainly manifested in the possession and free control of various tools and relationships). Our society and schools can maintain normal work through a series of disciplines, which can provide protection and positive influence for the development of good personality. Its promotion of students' personality development is mainly manifested in the following two points:
First of all, discipline can give us a good environment for personality development. A good environment can promote people's acquired development, just as flowers will bloom more brightly if there is enough sunshine. Similarly, the development of students' personality also needs a good environment as a guarantee to promote. Discipline can create an orderly environment for us and better promote the development of personality. Taking school discipline as an example, its original intention is to safeguard the interests of students, safeguard fairness and ensure the normal development of learning; The development of students' ability, including cognitive ability, skills and morality, is gradually cultivated and developed in normal study and life. In a good atmosphere, our knowledge and skills are enriched, our sentiment and morality are cultivated, our individuals are respected and our uniqueness is further developed.
Second, discipline can point us in the right direction and make our personality develop healthily. A person's life is a process of socialization, that is, the process of changing from a natural person to a social person, and its ultimate goal is to integrate into society. Only when students are in the collective can their personality develop better. We say that the standard to measure good and bad lies in the society, and disciplines have always adapted to the development of society (if they don't adapt, they will be destroyed, and even if a discipline is destroyed, a new discipline will be created). On the one hand, discipline plays a role in transmitting social values and collective values. We learn self-discipline from an early age and know what we can and can't do. On the one hand, standardize the behavior of individuals in the collective, guide students to cooperate with others, form good behavior habits, and make them develop in a direction that is more conducive to integration into the collective and society. In this way, our autonomy has been developed.
"Without rules, there would be no Fiona Fang". We are a socialist country, and we are creating a lively political situation of centralization, democracy, discipline, freedom, unity of will and personal comfort. Finally, let's once again hold high the sails of the "four newcomers" in the 2 1 century and be ideal, moral, educated and disciplined talents in the new century! Thank you!
First of all, I think that under this debate, "discipline" should refer to discipline in a narrow sense, which is formulated by the school. I don't want to expand the topic infinitely to "law will promote the development of human personality" and "morality will promote the development of human personality". Our topic today is clear: "Discipline will limit students' personality development. "
We have received discipline education since we entered school, which makes teaching and the relationship between teachers and students in a rigid state. Teachers stand on the podium to explain, ask questions, present and indoctrinate, and students sit in rows with their hands behind their backs, listening, answering, responding and accepting, which leads to the suppression of students' subjective initiative and even personality, and turns learning and innovation activities full of human beauty into boring, mechanical and false exam-oriented training. This loss.
Every child has a unique personality, and every child's spiritual world is a unique book, which needs teachers to understand, enlighten and cultivate with wisdom and reason. Therefore, students' autonomous activities should be given priority in teaching, and teachers should try their best to create opportunities for students to show their individuality, so that students can fully display their talents in a democratic, free and harmonious teaching world, thus cultivating their innovative ability.
If there is no such rigid discipline, students will have the initiative to participate in learning, students will feel that learning is not a burden, but a pleasure, and the learning atmosphere will be active. In this harmonious educational environment, teachers and students tolerate each other and discuss with each other, which eliminates students' concerns about teachers' authority, opinions and criticisms and makes students feel relaxed, comfortable and happy. They can express their opinions without worrying about violating the so-called discipline, dare to carry out illogical "whimsy", seek the "whimsy" of the opposite sex, and divergent "extrapolate", thus cultivating students' innovative thinking. ..... to be a useful person, so ...
There are no rules, Fiona Fang! Discipline is the guarantee.
Discipline refers to the means to correct behavior by imposing external constraints; (3) Discipline refers to the internal binding force acting on one's own behavior. These two meanings summarize the basic connotation of discipline, and also reflect that the formation process of good discipline is a process of gradual transition from external compulsory discipline to internal self-discipline.
Discipline and personality (positive)
Discipline is used to restrain what people have, not their personality. Any rules and regulations that obliterate people's personality are contrary to the core concept of legal and regulatory design. The formulation of a rule is to make personal personality development not affect the personality development of others. In Marx's materialist dialectics, there is a discussion about freedom and laws and regulations, which means that laws and regulations are made to make everyone independent and free. From this perspective, discipline does not limit the existence of individual personality development. To some extent, discipline can promote the healthy growth of individual personality. I think, since a wooden and law-abiding person who only knows professional knowledge can only be regarded as a machine, people who have no sense of team and law can't manage it, then a person who has his own independent thinking ability and can abide by discipline will be the most popular in the future, whether in enterprises or schools. There are also biological birds, animals, fish and reptiles, which are also caused by discipline. Perhaps, the other debater will say that they are so free and their personality is bound? Then let's think about how free they are Birds can only fly, animals can only crawl and fish can only swim. Isn't this the limitation of their character? Isn't this a flaw in their character? It is also evolved from bacteria and advanced from the ocean, but it is the discipline that causes all this. Isn't this obvious evidence for us?
Looking at the personality development of middle school students, we have been encouraging the personality development of middle school students, so some students flaunt their personalities and imitate adults and stars in their clothes, and some even make a splash. I don't think this is a real personality. At best, it is immature behavior made by immature teenagers. However, with discipline, students' self-righteous personality is bound to be restricted, and the controlled people often show certain rebellious psychology. Therefore, it is natural for students to reflect on their words and deeds, but we need to guide students and not let them deviate from their values.
In this way, discipline and personality development are not contradictory.
In fact, these words are not so much for students as a lesson I taught myself. We have to admit that the strictness of discipline will sharpen a person's mind, the existence of discipline will highlight a person's personality, and the restraint of discipline will improve a person's personality.
Strict discipline should be a part of moral education, and the task of moral education is to cultivate the advanced and correct ideology of the educated, so that they will have a personality that will not belittle their ambitions and humiliate their bodies under any circumstances; Uphold the life goal of being worthy of heaven and living up to people; Bowen's polite and harmonious attitude towards life; Thai but not arrogant, tolerant and sincere; Xiu De's dedication to society and courage made him a pillar of the country. So will discipline obliterate personality? "Freedom is the law" is just an excuse to avoid growth. What I want to say is that no matter how brave and skilled the nomadic people are, their natural undisciplined character and lack of discipline are precisely the most fatal weakness of this nation, which makes them unable to resist even a slight blow. The reason is obvious.
As we all know, there are no two people with identical fingerprints on the earth, and there are no two identical leaves on the tree. Similarly, there are no two absolutely identical people in the world. Everyone is different from others, everyone has his own unique style, and there are individual differences between people. We call personality the sum total of psychological characteristics that are constantly and steadily displayed in individuals, including how a person affects others, how to treat himself, and the whole picture of his internal and external qualities that can be recognized. Personality not only represents a person's consciousness tendency (this tendency is reflected in personal interests, hobbies, needs, motives, beliefs, ideals and so on. ), but also reflects the individual differences between people in ability, temperament, personality and so on.
Everyone has a personality, and everyone's personality is different. It is these people with different personalities that make up our vivid and colorful world and all kinds of interrelated and mutually restrictive human groups, which promote the progress of history and the changes of the times.
Personality runs through one's life and affects one's life. It is the needs, motives, ideals, beliefs and world outlook contained in people's personality tendency that guide the direction, goal and road of life; It is the temperament, personality, interest and ability contained in people's personality characteristics that affect and determine the style, career and destiny of life.
Thus, personality has a direct impact on a person's activities and life; It has a direct impact on a person's fate and future. Studying people's personality can not only help people fully understand people's mental and psychological functions and guide the direction of life, but also improve people's quality and enhance their adaptability.
Middle school students are in an important period of personality formation, and a correct personality theory has obvious significance and role in guiding them to grow up smoothly and treat life correctly.
Let's clarify the definition of personality first. Personality refers to a person's relatively fixed characteristics formed under certain social conditions and educational influence. Society and school are maintained by a series of disciplines, which can provide protection and positive influence for the development of good personality.
For example, students will have some extreme actions at their own age, and discipline is precisely to let students regulate their behavior and let them do more things that are conducive to their development. If there is no discipline, then not only the school management can not be guaranteed, but also the learning order of students can not be maintained, let alone the development of personality. Let me demonstrate how discipline can promote personality development. First of all, discipline can point out a correct direction for us and make our personality develop healthily. Second, discipline can create an orderly environment for us and make our personality develop better. Imagine that without discipline, it must not be the development of personality, but the breeding of bad habits. Generally, people who make great achievements are people who can restrain themselves, and discipline is precisely to let us learn self-discipline from an early age and know what we can and can't do. If there is no discipline, then not only the school management can not be guaranteed, but also the learning order of students can not be maintained, let alone the development of personality.
Harvard University allows students to set up their own majors suitable for their own personality development if they think they are not suitable for their own personality development! From the other side's point of view, there is no need for Harvard University to introduce this practice? Harvard University attaches great importance to the development of personality, but Harvard University also has its own school rules as the guarantee of personality development!
The collective interest is the common interest of all the people in this collective. How can the opposing debater say that it is the interests of some people? Up to now, the other party has not explained how discipline restricts personality development.
There are four arguments on the positive side:
Ladies and gentlemen, judges: Hello. Here, I have to point out another debater's logical mistake: the opponent argues: "or' promote personality development under the mainstream ideology of society'" Isn't this the development promoted by disciplines? And that's our point of view! The opponent argues that "when everyone abides by discipline, personality will be obliterated" and argues with the opponent that "the army should use strict discipline to limit the development of human nature! Discipline will imprison people's minds. " So you can break the law to develop your personality? Also, it seems that the other party has not clearly put forward his own argument from beginning to end, right? !
Now, let me make a summary statement on behalf of us: from the definition of our debate, the movement that tends to the good side can be called development, and the standard for measuring good and bad lies in society, while the discipline has always adapted to the development of society (if it does not adapt, it will be destroyed, even if it destroys a discipline, it will produce a new discipline). Although it cannot be said that the original intention of discipline is to promote the development of personality, there is no doubt that discipline is formulated to make everyone have a fair environment. Although this will restrict personal freedom to some extent, it will not have the side effect of hindering personality development. The so-called side effects, I think, are just an individual's defense of his behavior. If someone else's so-called personality development affects him, I think he may understand the role of discipline. In short, there is no promotion subjectively, but objectively it cannot be denied that there is promotion. Personality is not a unique habit of a person. I don't think that a person who likes stealing or cheating is also a development of personality. In other words, everything must be measured. Discipline affects students to some extent, that is, it promotes students' personality development. Our three arguments also said: if there is no discipline, it must not be the development of personality, but the breeding of bad habits. For another example, our life behavior is like a city, and discipline is the road in the city. Our personality should follow the road, which is development (provided that discipline is correct, but if it is not correct, is it still discipline? )。 However, the other debater has a misunderstanding, emphasizing that discipline limits the development of individual freedom and personality. In fact, discipline and freedom complement each other; Only strict discipline can guarantee everyone's freedom, and the violation of discipline by a few people is an infringement on the freedom of most people. The healthy development of a person's personality must also be guaranteed by discipline; Otherwise, the development of personality will go astray. We are a socialist country, and we are creating a lively political situation of centralization, democracy, discipline, freedom, unity of will and personal comfort. Finally, please allow me to borrow Deng Xiaoping's words again: educate the people of the whole country to have ideals, morality, culture and discipline. I think the most important thing is discipline! Because "without rules, there would be no Fiona Fang". Therefore, we believe that discipline promotes personality development. This is the end of my summary, thank you!
Let's clarify the definition of personality first. Personality refers to a person's relatively fixed characteristics formed under certain social conditions and educational influence. Society and school are maintained by a series of disciplines, which can provide protection and positive influence for the development of good personality.
For example, students will have some extreme actions at their own age, and discipline is precisely to let students regulate their behavior and let them do more things that are conducive to their development. If there is no discipline, then not only the school management can not be guaranteed, but also the learning order of students can not be maintained, let alone the development of personality.
Positive 3
The other party said that our "relative fixation" is "fixation"! ! The other party said that we covered the whole with one side. How can we see it? There is also the issue of standardization. Well, without standardization, there is no way to promote it.
Let me demonstrate how discipline can promote personality development. First of all, discipline can point out a correct direction for us and make our personality develop healthily. Second, discipline can create an orderly environment for us and make our personality develop better. Imagine that without discipline, it must not be the development of personality, but the breeding of bad habits.
Generally, people who make great achievements are people who can restrain themselves, and discipline is precisely to let us learn self-discipline from an early age and know what we can and can't do. If there is no discipline, then not only the school management can not be guaranteed, but also the learning order of students can not be maintained, let alone the development of personality.
Positive 3:
I don't know where the other party's definition of discipline comes from. Let me tell you, according to the Modern Chinese Dictionary, discipline: rules and regulations formulated by political parties, organs, armed forces, organizations and enterprises to safeguard collective interests and ensure the normal work, which each member is required to abide by. It not only represents the interests of some people. Edison's example is just an individual example. Don't generalize! ! ! ! !
The pros and cons express their opinions: the pros and cons express their opinions: thank you, Chairman, judges and guests, and other debaters. Now let me express our view that discipline promotes the development of personality. Discipline can create a good social environment, thus promoting the development of personality. In Marx's materialist dialectics, there is a discussion about freedom and regulation, which says that the purpose of making regulations is to make everyone independent and free. From this perspective, the law does not limit the existence of personality development. Discipline can promote the healthy growth of personality to some extent. Organizational discipline and personality development complement each other. College students need to cultivate their own physical quality, psychological quality, ideological and moral quality and intelligent quality. All these aspects need a certain degree of organizational discipline to guide people's behavior. Only in a stable and orderly environment can people practice their own personality. Organizational discipline is the premise of personality development. As the saying goes, "Fiona Fang can't be made without rules". Organizational rules are rules, norms and constraints, which are used to constrain certain behaviors of individuals. Looking around, whether macro or micro, there is discipline everywhere. The existence and development of individuals are carried out within the rules of this "Fiona Fang". Without this "Fiona Fang", I don't think this world would be a world. In our society composed of individuals, we also need various disciplines to develop and progress. Therefore, organizational discipline and personality development do not conflict in essence. With good organizational discipline, we can have a better space to play our individuality. Finally, we emphasize once again that discipline can promote personality development! Thank you. Counterargument: through the debate between the two sides, we still insist that "discipline inhibits personality development" We don't deny that discipline that meets the requirements can promote personality development. Other debaters put too much emphasis on discipline to promote personality development, which is extreme. From the other side's point of view, discipline is used to promote our personality development. The essence of discipline is to demand unity. Taking discipline as a model of personal growth is enough to imagine that future mission bearers are likely to become guardians of discipline and a model of conservatism. The so-called personality development, for college students, is to carry forward the consciousness, enthusiasm and initiative of learning, and make scientific judgments and accurate choices on learning content and methods according to the needs of market economy and social development. Cultivate your ability of independent thinking, hands-on and innovation, and find the path of follow-up learning as soon as possible. And can apply what they have learned, make discoveries and make inventions. The purpose of teaching reform is to give college students more free space and a more relaxed educational environment, but they all study freely and independently, from which they can discover and cultivate their own specialties and become people interested in learning. In this way, college students actually need to work harder, while learning and thinking about using it. Stay in school, always pay attention to the society and market, learn to obtain information through various channels, understand the trend of social demand, and adjust the learning content and methods. If discipline is to promote personality development, how can we talk about "education reform" when China's education system promotes personality development so strongly? I'm done summing up.
Agree: Another debater thinks that discipline restricts personality development, so should discipline be abolished? The opposing side: The opposing side believes that discipline is like a wall to prevent wild animals from entering. If this wall hinders our own development, should we tear it down? Founder: The other side, you should know that every city wall has gates! Opposing party: But discipline exists objectively and cannot be opened and closed at will like a door. Zheng Fang: Biological animals, birds, fish and reptiles are also subject to discipline. Perhaps, the other debater will say that they are so free, so is their personality bound? Counterparty: Please understand that birds, animals, fish and reptiles are not subject to discipline, but are determined by their unique physiological structure, just like people have to eat when they are hungry. This is just a physiological need, not a subject that requires people to eat. In favor: the state has laws, the society has social ethics, political parties have their own organizational discipline, and schools also have their own rules and regulations. Unlike primitive society, it is not depressed at will and does something by instinct. The development of personality needs complete and standardized discipline to improve. Counterparty: The other party said that "discipline promotes personality development". Please describe in detail how it is promoted.
Discipline is like a person's left hand, and personality is like a person's right hand. Some people think that using the left hand is more useful than using the right hand, while others think that the right hand is more useful than the left hand. So which one should I use first? Of course, none. It is necessary for the left and right sides to cooperate with each other and coordinate their use in order to play to the extreme. Therefore, discipline promotes personality development. Then please give examples to prove each other's point of view! Contrary: As Huang Yuan, director of the technical department of Guangzhou Football Association, said, there are no books about football training in local bookstores in Brazil, which shows that Brazilians have a complete understanding of football in their minds, so that the personality of young Brazilian football players can be fully exerted, and those charming green samba squares will appear: So, are there any corresponding rules on the football field? The answer is yes. Otherwise, it's not a ball game, it's hand-to-hand combat According to the opponent, discipline inhibits personality development, so is the personality of Brazilian players suppressed on the football field? If it is suppressed, will Brazil still be a football kingdom? Counterparty: May I ask another debater, is Han Han's personality shaped by discipline?
Pro: I want to ask another debater to make it clear first. After all, Han Han is an example. There are school rules and disciplines on campus, and the other debater thinks that discipline will inhibit personality development. Then why did you go to college to study, stand openly on the debate platform and give full play to your personality? Why don't you pack up and go home to develop your so-called personality? Counterparty: If "discipline promotes personality development", then I want to ask my opponent, should we also strictly discipline kindergarten children to develop their personality? I'm afraid that in this case, we will no longer be imaginative college students, but nerds now! Do you want to be an imaginative college student or a nerd? The opposing side summed up in words: lovely opposing debater, distinguished judges and guests! Hello, everyone.
Positive conclusion: Chairman, judges, debaters, students! Good afternoon everyone! Our view is that discipline promotes personality development. The other debater repeatedly stressed that discipline restricts personality development. Obviously ignoring the importance of the existence of organizational discipline and overemphasizing the development of personality, then I want to ask: if personality is placed above organizational discipline, what will be the ultimate consequence? You can only hit a wall everywhere!
What we emphasize is: first, organizational discipline is the premise of personality development. As the saying goes, "No rules, no Fiona Fang". A country has laws, a society has social morality, a political party has its own organizational discipline, a school has its own rules and regulations, and individuals act within the "Fiona Fang" rules. Secondly, organizational discipline and personality development are consistent. There is no absolute freedom in this world. Freedom is relative to freedom under the law. Only in a good environment can I study and live with peace of mind and express my personality. The two do not conflict in essence. Finally, I hope everyone can promote the cohesion of the team in terms of team discipline and the rules of this debate.
Let's sing loudly: there are differences in personality, competition in difference, progress in competition and development in progress. Let each of us spread our wings to meet the beautiful sunny day.
The first slogan of bank work incentive
1, focus on your heart and stick to your actions.
2. Promote small and medium-sized enterprises and Hui Ze W