Of all Shakespeare's works, Hamlet is probably the most controversial and striking one. /kloc-at the age of 0/6, you may be moved to tears by Romeo and Juliet, but you think The Tempest is puzzling. When you are 60 years old, you may be deeply moved by the latter's mysticism, but the former can no longer stir up waves in your heart ... But no matter at what stage of your life, when you have experienced a rich and profound spiritual life, when you have improved your personality and rediscovered a brand-new yourself, you can always find something that seems to belong to eternity and immortality in Hamlet. Because it talks about the choice of life, and the life path that a person who lives in a specific historical and living environment chooses when facing his unique destiny and the common destiny of all mankind, only the limited experience accumulated from the past can rely on and rely on. In a sense, his experience also represents our own experience, and the fate he faces is something we have to face at some stage of our lives. Facing the existence of despair, we explore the truth in contradictions, seek the truth in fog, act in difficulties, and rebuild the value system and spiritual building in a world that has lost standards and measurable standards. ...
Hamlet is imperfect. Sometimes his choices are irrational and impulsive, such as when he stabbed Polonius, who he mistakenly thought was the king, in anger. However, perhaps it is his irrational choice and expression of human weakness that makes us accept and agree with his artistic image from the bottom of our hearts, because we can often see his shadow in ourselves. ...
Hamlet also cherishes his feelings very much. When he pretended to be crazy to avoid the persecution of the king, he still couldn't help but miss Ophelia. He couldn't bear to make her suffer from pretending to be crazy, but he wrote her a little poem at the risk of being suspected by the king: "You should doubt that the stars are fire;" ; Doubt whether the sun moves; Doubting truth is a liar; But never doubt my love. That's it. Hamlet constructed his own tragedy in his choice of fate. It turned out that he could completely succumb to his own fate and not inquire about the truth about his father's death, but Hamlet's character did not allow him to live a mediocre life with a question, so he resolutely embarked on the road of finding the truth. Since then, as long as any choice he makes is slightly different, his fate and the fate of others will eventually change, but his experience has prompted him to make decisions that he thinks are correct but actually fatal again and again. Finally, Hamlet did not regret his choice. He just hoped that Horatio would "take a painful breath for him". To tell my story. " Because everyone's choice is unique and unrepeatable in a specific historical situation, it is meaningless to assume here that Hamlet can go back to the past and choose again. All of us are like this. It can be said that there is a Hamlet in each of us, and every choice we make is unique and irreplaceable, which will directly affect our future destiny. There is no standard to measure whether our choice is correct or not. We must accept all the consequences of our choice, as Hamlet said, "The unknown will live behind me!" " Maybe the problem we have to face is not as serious as "to be or not to be". However, in order to do well in this chaotic world full of risks? Instead of doing it right? Every choice will not be easy. In this world where there is no yardstick to measure its good and evil except the goal, make a brave choice and accept your destiny frankly ... is this the eternal charm of Hamlet?
Hamlet's second thought after reading is:
What kind of existence is fate? He can't live without us like a shadow, warm people's hearts like sunshine, but more often, he is as profound and terrible as a nightmare. "God's will dominates everything" (Horatio, another part of the terrace in the fifth scene of the first act), this sentence is undoubtedly quite incisive.
Hamlet, written in 1600~ 160 1, has been admired for centuries. Even now, I still find him very shocking. All this is not a plot factor, nor is it just an excellent literary technique, but a problem it embodies. On a large scale, it describes an extremely primitive tragedy, a human tragedy. The characters in the play have different status and distinct personalities, but they all suffer from the same thing, that is, manipulating their own desires and being called the big cage of fate. This kind of situation, perhaps since someone started, has never disappeared. They were born human.
Hamlet, the hero, first faced the disillusionment of his original ideal world. At first, Hamlet was in a feeling of "childhood". He has not experienced any major setbacks and his living environment is relatively simple. He has been studying western orthodoxy and thinks that "human beings are great masterpieces!" What a noble reason! What a great power! What a beautiful instrument! What an elegant move! How like an angel! What a wise god! The essence of the universe! The spirit of all things! Finally, the noble and admirable father died, and the chaste mother remarried with the uncle who usurped the throne within one month. This made him doubt the world. And this doubt directly led to his later hesitation. When he saw a ghost, he learned that his uncle had killed his father, which aggravated his disappointment with the real society and once again denied its original innocence, which made him distrust. "The ghost I saw may be the incarnation of the devil." Later, after discovering my uncle's heinous crimes through the play, I still didn't stop hesitating. Why? Hamlet is not the kind of person who shouts slogans. Doubt made him think. There is no perfect thing, chastity can't resist desire, and morality can't overcome greed. He thought he might retaliate, but the morally corrupt person was his mother, and he had her blood. But the uncle who killed his father is as human as he is, and he has human thoughts. But even if revenge succeeds, everything will come back. To this end, he said: "To be or not to be, this is a question worth thinking about." Living is a kind of pain, but I have such absolute fear of death. He met an unanswerable question, but he couldn't escape it.
Hamlet's situation is not unique. After careful analysis, we can find that the big hand of life is so tight on everyone.
The sudden death of the old king has nothing to do with the queen. But as a woman, she is faced with two choices, namely morality or desire. Whether to be a widow to protect her reputation or to marry a new king to meet her needs. This can be understood as the separation of spiritual desire and material desire. She chose the latter. However, she was despised and criticized by Hamlet, and her moral emptiness brought her considerable pain. In fact, the queen is a kind person, and she is not morally corrupt. So, what are those stains in her soul? Not before? Is she happy even if she chooses morality at first? When the king died, her misfortune was doomed. She was powerless to change this misfortune from the beginning. In the final analysis, what misfortune she is choosing is not her own fate.
The new king, the usurper's uncle, is the biggest villain in the play and a moral corrupter. He is bent on the throne and is eager to be queen. But the king is another man. It was his brother. He is doomed to lose the throne. We can call it a loss that this fate will never give him. Like others in the play, he is facing the disappearance of the ideal world. But he fought for it. In fact, at this moment, he showed a kind of heroism. He bravely fought for something that never belonged to him. This is his tragedy. He paid the price, and his hands were covered with other people's blood. He repented feebly. Later, he found that Hamlet already knew the truth, and he began to save his hard-won happy life that might be lost. He lingered between sin and reason, but in the end he didn't jump out and died by his own poisonous sword.
The fate of Laertes and Ophelia is strikingly similar to that of Hamlet. Their father was also killed. In the choice of survival or destruction, E Felicia chose the latter, escaped, and committed suicide. In the choice of revenge or not, Laertes is Hamlet's completely opposite avenger. Although facing the Danish prince and future king Hamlet supported by the people, he still shouted with high spirits: "So, a noble father of mine died in vain, and a good sister went crazy in vain?" ..... My chance for revenge will come one day. Such a call represents a spirit of struggle. He is like the new king. But he finally died in the trap designed by the new king for Hamlet. The two of them can be regarded as complements to Hamlet. On the issue of revenge and "inevitable" death, all the choices point to the same goal.
We find that all the characters in the play are facing an extremely powerful force, that is, the external world. It turns out that they all live happily like children in a beautiful hotbed arranged by God. Until one day, they found that this baby is actually an abyss swamp, how small they are. This is an era of upside-down chaos. Alas, it's a pity that I have to shoulder the responsibility of reorganizing Gan Kun. Hamlet discovered his incompetence for the first time. This is not only the incompetence of his revenge, but also the incompetence of revenge itself. The king usurps the throne and the queen remarries, which has something in common with this behavior in different senses. None of them has achieved what they want to achieve. Instead, I fell into another dilemma.
Another name of the play is Revenge of the Prince. In fact, the prince did not avenge the old king. Although the new king was stabbed to death in the end, it was more for his dying self. His revenge is a failure, because he has been wandering, and he hates the world and himself. He is cynical about others, but he keeps blaming himself. He wants to do something, but he doesn't move more often. His image is more like a painful wise man than the heroic recklessness of others. He fought more rationally.
Unlike Hamlet's stagnation, everyone else is fighting in action. The new king killed the old king, tried to repent to clear his sins, and tried to save the throne by killing Hamlet. Laertes and the king carried out a plan to make Hamlet pay for his father's death. My Felicia jumped into the lake. And the ghost who ordered his children to take revenge. His feelings are sad and his attitude is firm.
But in the end? The new king is dead, so to speak, he has got his revenge. Laertes died, and the plan failed. Hamlet died of revenge from others. The ghost is still underground and can't go to heaven.
Some people say that Hamlet's plot is far-fetched. How can everyone die? But this is precisely the reality. He showed us the final outcome of a group of people who struggled with their fate. They tried to change their destiny, but nothing was saved. They tried to redeem the past, but found nothing. This helplessness depends on everyone, which may be the greatest misfortune of people themselves. Hamlet-style tragedy is with everyone, every aspect, all the time.
Hamlet's thoughts after reading three:
As one of Shakespeare's four tragedies, Hamlet is the most classic in my opinion. He can be said to have gathered all the sufferings in the world on the poor prince.
My father was killed by his uncle, my mother remarried, and even married my father's enemy. My wife went crazy and died unfortunately. Finally, he, his friend and his mother were completely swallowed up by this tragedy. This series of tragedies stems from desire and hatred. Uncle's greedy desire made him do something against the laws of nature and ethics, and also caused his nephew's indelible hatred. At the same time, it also laid an inevitable curse for his fate until his family was ruined. The little prince was deeply saddened by his father's death and had the idea of revenge because of his father's ghost. So I planned step by step, trying to avenge my father with my own strength, but trying my best to protect my mother, but I never thought that accidents would happen constantly, and my mother, lover, friend and myself were all lost.
Shakespeare seems to have revealed the horror of hatred to the world with such words. It is a double-edged sword, extremely sharp and full of poison. Whoever uses him is like selling his soul to the devil. When they lose their minds and stab others, they will inevitably make themselves black and blue and bloody. Man's curse and rejection of hatred never stops. Dumas' The Count of Monte Cristo also explains to people that hatred is more evil than sin itself. For whatever reason, rising hatred is the beginning of all evil and misfortune. Despite this truth, human beings have never got rid of this ghost. People have been hurting others and themselves for hatred, and even endless blood has failed to wash away its existence.
Hamlet is constantly being interpreted by people in various ways and forms. People never get tired of watching one movie after another. The compact plot of Hamlet is full of climax and surprise, and all the tension will not be relieved until the end of the story. Various interpretations of the master's works constantly give us new surprises and accidents, and explanations of hatred and Shakespeare. Even if something is not satisfactory, people are still curious about it. Because Shakespeare, the greatest playwright, is also one of his greatest works. No matter from which angle you interpret this classic, there will be another dialogue between people, and each dialogue is a new experience of life. This is the charm of Hamlet. Writers always use their words to remind people of the coldness and horror of this sword. Hatred is a double-edged sword. It is much wiser to abandon it than to pick it up for self-defense.
The above three articles, LZ delete, delete, change and use together.
PS: I am also a senior one, and these articles are more in line with the level of senior one.
In addition: there are several good articles in Baidu Library for reference, but if there are too many contents, they will not be posted. LZ, go and see for yourself.
Baidu search will do.