Interpretation of extreme speed space CPU ladder diagram version 4.37:

1 and ZEN2 officially surpassed Intel, but they did not completely surpass it.

The transcendence of the processor is mainly manifested in higher core efficiency and lower power consumption at the same frequency.

AMD official data ZEN2 has two data, one is 29% and the other is 15%. The former is a concrete test related to IPC calculation, involving mixed integer and floating-point DKERN+RSA. The test result of ZEN 2 architecture is 4.53, which is about 29.4% higher than ZEN. The latter 15% is close to daily application. The core efficiency of ZEN2 has surpassed that of Core IX, as can be seen from the comparison between R7-3700X and i9-9900K. Although based on 7nm technology, ZEN2 still dare not pull the frequency to 5GHz, which shows that AMD still loses in power control.

2. Algebraic definition: Athlon 200GE, R3-2200G and R5-2400G belong to the first generation of Ruilong strictly, but they adopt some characteristics of the second generation. In the same way, Ruilong Mobile Edition 3000 and Desktop Edition 3000G series are actually ZEN+ (Ruilong II), not three generations.

3. The same ranking does not mean the same performance in an application. A few people are not happy to see AMD TR-2990WX and i9-9980XE together. Your picture is not good. 32 core and 18 core are in the same place. In fact, when sorting, we need to consider what the users who buy this CPU are mainly used for, rather than just running away with a piece of software. Multi-core is excellent in rendering (CINEBENCH R 15, V-Ray and other applications), but MAYA, UNREAL, PR and so on. The performance of i9-9980XE, which lags behind the kernel less, especially the PR commonly used by video editing users, will be twice as fast, which involves multi-thread support of software and instruction set optimization. , simply according to the core number.

Similarly, the position of R5-2600 is not higher than that of i5-9400F, so the game performance is faster.

4, regardless of the nuclear display performance. This picture only studies the performance of the CPU itself, excluding the GPU (graphics card integrated in the CPU). The performance of GPU is reflected in the ladder diagram of graphics card. Only in this way can we make it clear, which is easy to understand: a good student in mathematics cannot be judged by the total score of mathematics and Chinese.

5. Guide the purchase. Although some models can't be eliminated for the time being, they are still marked in gray in the ladder diagram of limit space 4.3. The biggest function of ladder diagram is to guide users to choose processors, and the purpose of marking with gray is to tell users who buy new machines not to choose this model. Such as Ruilong 1600X and 1700. There are 2600 and 2700 with better cost performance.

I suggest you choose the computer that suits you according to the following five grades.

1, Getting Started Model (Practical) Suggestions:

This grade is mainly based on core graphics cards.

Recommended 1: Athlon 200GE+A320M motherboard +DDR4 dual-channel memory+core graphics card WIN 10 users.

Athlon 200GE is an APU with Ruilong architecture, but it does not belong to Ruilong series. AMD's entry-level products belong to the Athlon range, which makes 200GE a little sad. Athlon 200GE uses an improved version of ZEN, but it is not as good as ZEN+, because 200GE is 14nm process, and ZEN+ is 12nm. Its competitor is Intel G4560, whose CPU performance is about 5% lower than that of G4560, but its core graphics card performance is about 60% higher, so its performance in ordinary games will be higher than that of G4560, but don't expect too much.

Note: The term "core graphics card" was originally used for Intel processors, but now there is no strict distinction.

Recommended 2:2:g 5400+h 3 10M+00M+ core graphics card WIN 10 users.

G5400 integrates UHD6 10 nuclear display, and there is no driver compatible with win7 at present.

Recommendation 3: Intel i3-8100/g5600+h 310mwin 7 motherboard (such as MSI H3 10M PLUS series)+core graphics card win7 users.

All the above combinations support win7. At present, i3-8 100/G5600 has built-in UHD630 nuclear display and is driven by adaptive WIN7.

2. Suggestions for the intermediate model:

First choice1:i3-9100f/i5-9400f+H310m/b360m/b365m board +DDR4 dual-channel memory+single display is the first choice.

After Intel introduced the processor with F, the price dropped a little, which made up for some cost-effective disadvantages to some extent. Although many people shouted the slogan of AMD YES, Intel reduced the price by 10%, and he immediately surrendered. According to the feedback data of physical store sales recently, the roll call rates of i3-9 100F and i5-9400F are both very high.

It's a bit troublesome to install the pure version of win7 on Ruilong's mainframe, but Intel found the right time and introduced special motherboards for win7 (some models H3 10 and B365), and some motherboards H3 10 can also support DDR3 memory, so upgrading users can save a lot of money (if they are worried about low frequency, use dual channels).

Scheme 2: R3-2200g/3200g/R5-3400g+A320m/B450m motherboard +DDR4 dual-channel memory nuclear display is the first choice.

The performance of R3-3200G CPU is improved by about 8% compared with 2200g CPU. The core graphics card is Vega8, and the core frequency is higher. Because 2200G is cheap 150 yuan (20 1908027 price), for this level of processor, 2200G still has certain advantages.

R5-3400G is an upgraded version of 2400G, which is basically out of stock. It seems that the inventory has been cleared almost.

The biggest highlight of AMD's latest APU R3-3200G is the built-in laser dragon Vega8 graphics core graphics card (note 1), referred to as Vega 8. With dual-channel DDR 4-2400 memory, the performance is about 75% of that of GT 1030, and the market price of GT 1030 is about 440 yuan. According to the calculation of 440X75%=330, if the price of 2GB memory in 60 yuan is deducted, this Vega8 graphics card is worth 270 yuan, and the remaining processor is only equivalent to more than 300 yuan.

R5-3400G has four more threads than R3-3200G, the kernel frequency is 0.2GHz, and the kernel is displayed as Vega 1 1. Vega8 is not smooth in large 3D games, and Vega 1 1 is basically hopeless, which can only be solved by adding a single monitor. The reasonable valuation gap between them is within 300 yuan. Today, R3-2200G is more cost-effective.

Note: When using the stand-alone display of Ruilong APU, special attention should be paid to the performance gap between nuclear display and stand-alone display. For example, the stand-alone display of R5-3400G+GT 1030 is a typical abnormal configuration, because the performance of R5-3400G's core graphics card is equivalent to GT 1030 under high-frequency dual-channel memory, which is tantamount to wasting money.