First of all, it should be clear that "marine warrior" is more similar to the concept of individual combat than a specific piece of equipment. For example, a soldier, who has a full suit of marine soldiers, didn't take XM8, but took M4A 1. Is he equipped with land warriors? We have also been studying the concept of individual combat similar to "marine warrior". Individual cameras and monitors also have a small number of devices. As for wearable computers, they started very early. It's just that we didn't say anything about weapons. In addition, our combat network supporting the "Land Warrior" is still very simple, and the whole mobile communication is advanced equipment. What's more, I don't know who thinks, but our data link has actually made three sets, one for each, and these three sets are incompatible with each other. This is chaos! Therefore, it is still early for our "land warriors" to truly form a climate! But if you say the whole "land gladiator" who fights alone, it's not a problem for us. Our soldiers' military skills are indeed solid and hard-working, but they seem to lack subjective initiative and personal creativity. Most of our soldiers are a generation trained under the existing education system in China. What is instilled from childhood is "obedience, focusing on collective interests." Many times, some individuals' initiative has been obliterated or "stranded". Many times it is based on the willpower of superiors. In our opinion, individual heroism is not desirable, and it will be very different. From the daily contact, our army usually awards the title of hero with the smallest "company" as the unit.

Our army has always advocated the revolutionary spirit of "one is not afraid of death and the other is not afraid of suffering". Personally, sometimes this slogan needs to be changed. The current war is no longer an era when you can win if you fight hard. We suffered losses in this respect in the counterattack, and sometimes we can avoid some unnecessary casualties. Let the soldiers play by themselves and how they want to play, instead of emphasizing "obedience" blindly. Sometimes a person's creativity is infinite, and a person's strength cannot be underestimated.

Our soldiers rely more on "groups" and feel too "obedient" and too rigid. However, this can give play to our army's tenacious and do-or-die style in wartime. Our army is a "belief", and the interests of the state and the collective are higher than those of individuals. Even if we can't beat them, the last one will choose to die with the enemy. The word surrender is not in our military dictionary. Our soldiers will have a lot of "brave words" before they die. Personally, I think our soldiers are majestic and fearless.