If the evaluation plan has this provision, you can add points. If it is not involved, it is impossible to add points.
First of all, an excellent class is a collective honor, not an individual honor. Collective honor doesn't work here, only the honor that individuals get alone can get extra points. For example, excellent class teachers, excellent teachers, excellent educators, teachers' morality pacesetters, teaching experts, excellent teaching researchers and so on.
Secondly, our professional title evaluation mainly includes the following points: first, the distribution of teaching age. One point a year, the longer you teach, the more points you get. Old teachers have the advantage of teaching age.
The second is to score the length of service. The length of service is calculated from the time of appointment, not from the year of assessment.
The third is to assign points to various honorary certificates and papers. Comprehensive honor has high gold content, while personal honor has low gold content. Teachers' Day honor is the most recognized. Of course, it is also graded according to different levels of provinces, cities, counties and towns.
Business results are mainly certificates obtained from various open classes, demonstration classes and lecture competitions.
Papers published in public can be found on the website designated by the Press and Publication Administration, or recommended by education departments at all levels. It is also allocated according to different levels.
Certificates and papers are limited to three.
The fourth is democratic appraisal. The highest score is 20, and the lowest score is 16. Go to various schools to find representatives of different ages and grade those who have been promoted to professional titles.
The fifth is the teaching achievement. The teaching achievements in the past two years are counted by the staff of the teaching and research section, and then graded according to grades.
Sixth, the distribution of work. Class teachers, principals, department administrators and other personnel in charge of the work have extra points, but they should set an upper limit to reflect the principle of more work and more pay.
Seventh, the distribution of academic qualifications. According to junior high school, technical secondary school (high school), college diploma, university diploma and other different educational levels, corresponding points will be given, and then points will be given according to the number of years held during working hours.
Finally, calculate the total score, and recommend the promotion title list according to the number of points after publicity. Many teachers failed to pass the title evaluation because of the low gold content or insufficient number of certificates. Therefore, we need to make more efforts to get the certificate at work, so that DeUEX can return home triumphantly when evaluating the professional title.
An excellent class group is an affirmation of the work of the class teacher and an encouragement to the class teachers and students. Honor belongs to everyone. In the annual assessment, the school can give extra points to the head teachers and classroom teachers of excellent classes, which is more useful than finding money for teachers.
When evaluating professional titles, the collective honor certificate of excellent classes is useless and cannot be used as a teacher's excellent certificate.
Teachers really need a lot of certificates to evaluate professional titles, among which excellent certificates are a hard condition. But this is a teacher's own excellent certificate, not a collective honor. For example, the annual assessment of teachers is recognized as excellent by the education authorities at or above the district level, and other comprehensive excellent teachers can be used as proof materials when evaluating their professional titles.
It is not easy for a class to be rated as an excellent class group. It embodies the hard work of the class teacher and the classroom teacher, and the students also actively cooperate with the work and do a good job according to the teacher's requirements. This honor is not only for teachers, but also for students. Students will be proud of this and have confidence in their studies.
There are various thresholds when evaluating professional titles. The term, performance, awards, etc. of the head teacher. It is an important basis for assessment.
Obtaining the excellent class collective certificate is not only the honor of the class, but also the credit of the class teacher. Generally, when adding points to the evaluation of professional titles, it is also an additional item.
1. What are the extra points in the evaluation of teachers' professional titles?
In the evaluation of professional titles, due to the limited places, participants need to go through the school. Those who successfully submit materials and participate in the next round of competition have low scores, and the lower-ranking commission has no chance to submit materials upwards.
Take my unit as an example. Every teacher should prepare the following materials when applying for professional titles every year.
As long as the head teacher is responsible and willing to suffer, there will always be opportunities. If the class is rated as "excellent class collective" and the level is above the municipal level, our unit will generally put it in the "education and teaching at all levels" plus points.
Second, what should ordinary teachers pay attention to when evaluating their professional titles
Most grass-roots teachers know that it is obvious to all that ordinary teachers want to be rated as senior teachers, especially in primary and secondary schools. The competition is fierce and it is very difficult.
Once you enter the threshold and have the opportunity to participate in the review, you need to come up with excellent materials and strive for the opportunity to report. Make full preparations for evaluating a higher-level professional title.
As an ordinary teacher, it is not easy to accumulate all kinds of materials, so we should pay special attention to the usual accumulation, and we should not cram for the Buddha's feet.
1. Be a conscientious person at ordinary times.
As an ordinary teacher, I don't have the advantage of "getting the moon first" as a school leader. If you want to get a certificate in various competitions, you can add points in the evaluation of professional titles, and the competition is still great.
When you meet open classes, lectures and other activities, you must actively participate, make full preparations, and strive for better awards. After a few years, as long as you are willing to endure hardships and use your brains diligently, you can generally get some awards and certificates, which can add points to the evaluation.
2. Do a good job of the class teacher
According to the professional title evaluation management in this respect, the working years of the class teacher are bitter and fast, and the intermediate and advanced levels correspond to the necessary years respectively.
As the main question says, if a class wins the collective honorary title of excellent class in the appraisal at or above the municipal level, the head teacher can not only get the honor, but also get extra points when the title is promoted.
3. Be a research-oriented teacher
Writing papers, researching topics and being a research-oriented teacher are not only a slogan, but also the needs of teachers' self-development.
A few years before I participated in the evaluation of professional titles, I consciously wrote some professional and management papers and actively declared teaching and education topics at all levels. In our unit, papers and scientific research projects have clear quantitative requirements, and ordinary teachers are easy to get extra points.
In short, teachers, especially ordinary teachers at the grass-roots level, need to make plans early if they want to evaluate their professional titles more easily. They should always be conscientious people, strive for more points within their power, and realize their dream of promotion as soon as possible.
I am a Chinese teacher in a junior high school. I have been a class teacher for almost twenty years. From my experience, I have never met a substitute class that was rated as an excellent class group, but when I was evaluating my professional title, I was promoted because of this group. Last year, Class 2, Grade 6, primary school in our school was rated as the first excellent squadron in the province. The head teacher used this condition when evaluating the deputy senior teachers, and thus passed the evaluation.
In fact, it is not difficult to find that the collective honor of excellent classes is only useful to the class teacher, but not to other teachers.
The Qualification Assessment Conditions for Professional and Technical Positions of Primary and Secondary School Teachers in Gansu Province clearly states that he has carefully completed the German syllabus, worked as a head teacher for more than six years since teaching, and worked as a head teacher for at least three years since any level, and was awarded an excellent head teacher, an excellent class group or an excellent counselor by the education administrative department at or above the county level, or won awards at or above the school level for three times.
In the evaluation and engagement of intermediate titles, it is also mentioned that being a class teacher and also being a class teacher and receiving rewards are the conditions for promoting titles.
To sum up, excellent class collectives are only useful to class teachers when evaluating and hiring professional titles.
Our evaluation of professional titles here mainly depends on qualifications, and has nothing to do with Excellence or not. I believe many places are like this! Teachers' evaluation of professional titles is very important, not only the issue of salary increase, but also personal honor. In some places, the evaluation of professional titles is fierce, and every time the evaluation of professional titles is a Kung Fu drama!
The salaries of lecturers in our school are higher than those of teaching assistants, 800 yuan. The salary after being assessed as an associate professor is higher than that of a lecturer 1000 yuan; The salary of a professor is higher than that of an associate professor 1500 yuan.
In that ordinary school, excellent class groups are basically useless for evaluating professional titles, so what is the most useful for evaluating professional titles?
1. Teachers' working years and qualifications are most useful for evaluating professional titles.
Professional titles have been criticized for a long time, and many people oppose the system of evaluating professional titles, because the evaluation of professional titles basically depends on qualifications rather than ability. No matter how the teacher teaches, no matter whether he has teaching ability or not, as long as he is old, he will give priority to the evaluation of professional titles!
And many outstanding teachers later, although they achieved a lot of competition results, brought out good classes and published important papers and topics. These are useless, they can only be reversed by year …
The schools here are all like this. The last evaluation of professional titles was based on their years in school. As long as they meet the fixed number of years, they can basically evaluate their professional titles, while those who are two or three months short of one year will have no chance and can only wait for the next batch!
2. The consequences of professional titles lead to teachers' inactive work.
I guess this is also caused by the inaction of the leaders. In order not to cause conflicts between teachers, leaders line up according to the number of years across the board, so that teachers are not easy to have opinions and leaders are more worry-free!
However, this will cause teachers to slack off, teachers will no longer pursue teaching achievements, and they will muddle along. It will also cause young teachers to lose hope and confidence, because it is useless for teachers behind to work hard unless they get national and provincial awards!
Although there are many problems in the title system, it is difficult to have a good system to replace the title system now.
In fact, the system of evaluating professional titles itself is an effective incentive system, but in the implementation stage of the school, the system is chaotic and the gap between teachers is not obvious, so in order to avoid the contradiction between teachers and the embarrassment of leaders, we have to adopt the method of seniority.
This not only takes care of the old teachers' emotions, but also makes young teachers generally accept them emotionally, because young teachers sometimes have difficult times, so long as they insist on doing so, they will have a very calm life.
However, the ultimate damage is the academic performance of students and the reputation of the school. Now the society also ranks schools, putting pressure on teachers and leaders of schools.
Therefore, in order to crack down on the criticism of the professional title system, many schools adopt new ways to motivate teachers. For example, our school is going to start implementing the performance-based pay reform.
In the reform of performance pay, not only the basic salary is guaranteed to be paid according to the professional title, but also part of the salary is guaranteed to be paid according to the performance appraisal method.
This is to arouse the enthusiasm of young teachers. Although a competent teacher can't evaluate the professional title immediately, he can achieve good results and get more salary by virtue of his ability!
It stands to reason that the collective award of excellent class is a collective award, not an individual award. There should be matching awards, such as excellent class teacher award or model class teacher award. Only an excellent class teacher can create an excellent class group. However, in actual recognition, many of them are only collective awards, and there are no individual awards.
On the other hand, is this collective award useful for the class teacher to evaluate the professional title? It doesn't matter if I say it, it doesn't matter if you say it, and it's no use if everyone says it. It depends on the formulation of the school's professional title evaluation plan. Personally, I think this award should be included, but in addition to the collective award of the outstanding class leader, a work distribution table of the head teacher of the school in that year should be added to prove who brought out the outstanding class leader.
In any case, it would be nice if this problem was taken into account in the school's professional title evaluation plan. If you don't consider it, you can make suggestions to the school. If adopted, if not adopted, alas, then obey the plan and prepare your own materials according to the requirements in the plan.
My humble opinion, welcome to communicate!
I want to express my views on this issue.
Teachers' titles have been implemented for many years, including junior, intermediate and senior titles. Different titles have different salaries. The teacher worked hard from the beginning, which can be said to be the goal of life. Education is teaching and educating people, an ordinary post, without the desire to be promoted and get rich. As long as you work hard, teach students well and achieve yourself, it is your greatest wish. Professional titles are limited by years. There will be hardware then. Only through competition can there be hope of promotion.
As for the conditions for evaluating professional titles, there are different regulations in different places. What can be counted as a score and what can't be counted as a score is stipulated by the higher education department. For example, teaching experience, education, honor, five-year assessment and teaching evaluation. These calculations are divided, added and arranged according to the quota.
It is useless to honor the excellent class, because the honor is won by the head teacher, teachers and students, not by one person. The honor of an excellent class teacher is useful, because the certificate says in which year Comrade XXX was rated as an excellent class teacher. This honor belongs to the class teacher.
In a word, professional title evaluation is the sum of many hardware, and what honor is useful or not depends on the regulations of the higher education department. Teachers should pay attention to the usual accumulation, every little makes a mickle. Opportunities are always reserved for those who are prepared.
It doesn't play much role at present. Among the ten conditions for evaluating professional titles, as long as there is a job equivalent to three years as a class teacher, there is no hard limit and it must be excellent!
Useful, but not very useful.
The requirements for evaluating professional titles vary from place to place. Take our place as an example, there is no certificate requirement for the class teacher, only that we should have the experience of being a class teacher.
However, the excellent class group is also an honorary certificate. As long as it is an honorary certificate, it will be useful in evaluating professional title points. The more certificates, the higher the score.
Each school has different requirements for evaluating professional title points. Taking our school as an example, it is mainly the integral of the following situations:
First: as a class teacher.
A little taller than the average teacher.
Second: teaching score;
In order, the first prize is the highest, followed by others.
Third: honorary certificate points.
It is divided into national, provincial, municipal, county and university levels. The integral is also from high to low.
Fourthly, the integral of subject papers.
It is also based on the national, provincial, municipal and county levels. The integrals are sorted from high to low.
In this way, with more honorary certificates, your score will definitely be high and it will be easier to evaluate. In this sense, any certificate is useful.
In school, as long as it is an honorary certificate, it is useful to strive for it as much as possible when evaluating professional titles.
I hope the above answers are helpful to you!
Speaking of evaluating professional titles, I just participated in the declaration of senior professional titles in middle schools in September this year, but because the project appraisal certificate came two months late, I failed the qualification examination and lost an opportunity.
In recent years, the evaluation of professional titles has always been a pain in teachers' hearts. The key is that the performance conditions of job qualifications can not meet the requirements, and the performance conditions of professional title evaluation in various provinces in China are slightly different according to the situation of each province. However, the performance conditions of the class teacher's work still have high gold content. The following is the description of this performance requirement in our province:
This is a condition that can be used when evaluating the titles of senior teachers. As long as it is awarded by schools and education administrative departments at or above the county level, it meets certain requirements. But if it is not the excellent collective title awarded by the administrative department of education, it will be greatly discounted and of little use!
As far as I know, teachers can make use of the honor of outstanding collectives and play a corresponding role in the following aspects.
1. Evaluate senior titles and promotion titles as performance conditions.
2. The teacher's year-end assessment can be used as an assessment plus item to improve the assessment ranking and evaluate the excellent grade.
3. Evaluate and hire professional titles, and take promotion as a plus item to increase your advantage in competitive positions at school.
4. As a plus item for teachers to strive for Excellence, increasing the advantages of competitive evaluation is also the basis for selecting a higher honor. If you win the honor at the school level, you will have the opportunity to sign up for the honor at or above the county level!
In short, the honor of the class teacher's work plays a great role in the evaluation of teachers' professional titles!
I am an old class talking about education, and I would like to share it with you!