Personally, I think the college entrance examination will never be cancelled. As long as there is a relatively standardized regime (even not necessarily the regime of the * * * production party), the examination system for selecting talents will always exist. Maybe the way is more diversified and reasonable.
First of all, let's take a look at the talent selection in ancient China. At that time, it was time to go to Beijing to catch the exam, and an article was sure to be done. It is more unreasonable than the current inspection method, but this system has enabled China to create a splendid ancient civilization.
Let's take a look at the overseas college entrance examination inspection methods that many students envy now. A high school student in the United States complained bitterly that the college entrance examination system in China was better. It is said that in America, you should pay extra attention to every course. Every night's homework will affect your final grade of this course, and the final grade of each course will affect what kind of university you go to. All universities need to apply, and many universities have all kinds of strange topics. It takes a lot of experience to apply for a university, and it is really hard for a person to apply for a university of 5 ~ 10 if he wants to be admitted to a satisfactory university! Regarding the audit of universities, I personally think it is very arbitrary and subjective! That is, the reviewers read your articles and scores, then appreciate you and admit you! It's a copy of China's ancient exams! That is, the examiner thinks your article is good, and after a turn, you are the champion!
To sum up, China's college entrance examination system is objective. And it is very complicated with China's national conditions. At present, China has a large population, relatively few resources for higher education, and a small proportion of teachers and students in colleges and universities (that is, fewer teachers and more students). The teacher-student ratio of a famous American university is 1:2, and Dr. China is a large class tutor! ) Just imagine, if colleges and universities in China adopt the way of submitting resumes from the United States to select students, it would be strange for teachers not to be exhausted!
Next, why not let everyone receive higher education? The core reason should be the lack of educational resources in China. This is related to economic development. Although China's economy has developed rapidly, it is still poor. Higher education needs to invest a lot of resources, including venues, facilities, teachers and so on. Especially facilities, the cost is very high. Engineering colleges spend the most on experimental instruments, and one instrument costs millions. Even the instruments used by students to do experiments should be more than1w. If you can't guarantee the experimental link in teaching, what's the use of going out if the people trained in this way have no ability?
What adapts to the degree of economic development is the country's demand for higher education talents. At present, the supply of domestic university graduates and graduate students exceeds demand, which is why universities have to pay tuition fees, and graduate students have to pay tuition fees, mainly to restrict everyone's admission. If graduates can't find jobs smoothly, they will become unemployed people in society. When people have no money and can't earn money, they will engage in criminal activities in order to survive, thus causing social instability, so this phenomenon must be avoided. The ways to avoid it should be "open source" and "throttling". Open source is to provide more jobs (but this should adapt to economic development), and throttling is to limit the enrollment of universities.
I think many people in developed countries such as the United States and Japan still don't go to college. Because I have watched many Japanese cartoons and American movies, many of the protagonists have never even attended college or high school. If a cultural work is to be accepted by everyone, it should be close to people's lives. So it shows that those who have not received higher education in developed countries still account for a large proportion!
Besides, I don't think it is necessary to receive higher education to do a lot of work. Higher education should be further promoted in theory and further cultivated in ability. The characteristic of vocational schools is to cultivate ability directly, not theory. In fact, a lot of work, you don't need to know why to do it, just know how to do it. This should be regarded as social division of labor, that is, not everyone must understand the whole process of work.
On the problem that the economic level determines the educational situation.
Let me ask a question first: Are people born equal or unequal?
I think people are born unequal. If we insist on equality, it is genetic equality, that is, if we are in the same environment, our development potential should be the same. Unfortunately, everyone was born in a different environment. As a person who wants to take the college entrance examination, he must often think: Why is it so easy for people in Beijing to take the college entrance examination? I wish I had been born in Beijing. But why don't you think it's easier for Americans to get into college! Wouldn't it be better to be born in America? You can't decide where you live or the external environment. Being born in a poor family and a poor area means making more efforts. This is a helpless and realistic thing. If you want to reach the same level as people with good education environment since childhood in such an environment, you must make more efforts.
I think it makes sense for rich people to go to good schools. If money can't make people get more benefits, where does the motivation come from? Without the motivation to earn money, society will not develop. It makes sense for a good school to collect money. Quality schools need venues, facilities and well-paid teachers. These are all money. The headmaster of a private school is a business owner, and no boss will do business at a loss! The state has some subsidies for poor students, which is equivalent to a regulation in the market economy, so that poor students can also receive a good education. But this ratio is indeed relatively small, and it takes a lot of efforts.
Of course, it is really sad to think of the reality that one generation is poor and the other generation is poor. But the only way to change this situation is for one generation to make more efforts than others. Because of the rich, but also because of the efforts of our ancestors! China was like this in ancient times, now and in the future. This is the case all over the world.
On the relationship between scores and abilities.
High scores are not directly proportional to high ability, but they are indeed related to intellectual ability. I think people who get high marks mainly have the following advantages. 1, a certain intellectual ability. 2. Control your ability. Be able to control yourself and devote yourself to learning. Many smart people are defeated at this point. 3. Arrange your time reasonably. You can't get high marks by studying blindly. How to adjust study and rest, and allocate the time proportion of different topics in the examination room. These are abilities.
When it comes to the abilities that students with high scores lack, I think there are the following points. 1, physical fitness. People who study every day are not very good at sports. But I think they will realize this in their spare time in the future. So this can be remedied. 2. The ability to communicate with others. Communication skills are really not easy to exercise, which some excellent students lack. On the other hand, if you have excellent communication skills, perseverance, and a personality that is not afraid of failure, you can go to society without going to college. 3. Hands-on ability. Many experimental courses will be offered in the university. As studious students, they will be compensated by repeated practice. Besides, solid theoretical knowledge is only good for practice.
Personally, I think the score can reflect my personal ability from a macro perspective. Of course, some people have special talents outside textbooks, such as art, literature and sports. Then you can be less bound by textbooks and bravely pursue your dreams.