Although "show" is a derogatory term, it is a common word in today's anti-corruption struggle. It is often that after a certain department has introduced an anti-corruption measure, some people use "show" to summarize, evaluate and criticize; However, for the launching department, you said it was a "show", but I thought it was a necessary measure to fight corruption and a "good prescription" ... The result was of course "a heated debate that no one could convince anyone".
What is the reason? I think the key is that the two sides of the dispute have different understandings of the connotation and extension of the concept of "show" and different standards. The author believes that as far as anti-corruption is concerned, if the "prescriptions" prescribed by some departments have the following characteristics, they are generally within the scope of "show".
What is the biggest feature of "putting on a show"? Just not seeking truth from facts It's not like that. You have to pretend to be serious. It's true that it's false, and it's true that it's false. For example, Cheng, vice chairman of the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC), said, "I can't sleep well when I think that there are still100000 people in Guangxi who have not been lifted out of poverty." What about the back? Collaborate with mistresses to covet 40 million. Xiao, the former mayor of Fuyang City, Anhui Province, said: "Fighting corruption and promoting honesty is a long-term task before us. We must resolutely punish corruption and severely investigate and deal with illegal acts such as corruption and bribery, dereliction of duty, extortion, and abuse of power for personal gain. " However, on the night when he said this, he "accepted" the "red envelope" of 1 10,000 yuan on the grounds of being promoted to mayor. It is true that people talk in front of others and people talk nonsense behind them. This kind of performance of corrupt officials generally belongs to the category of "show".
The second feature of "putting on a show" is the so-called "grasping the scale of enlargement". In some places, departments and fields, anti-corruption is not anti-corruption, but symbolic. There are obviously a lot of corruption problems around us, such as land acquisition corruption, urban demolition corruption, state-owned enterprise restructuring corruption and so on. , are not small, just don't grasp, just dare not touch, dare not move. Nevertheless, we should make a fuss at the top of our lungs for fear that others will not know that he is fighting corruption. This anti-corruption practice of persimmons generally belongs to the scope of "show".
The third feature of "putting on a show" is that we have to fight corruption under the pressure of the situation. However, only slogans are not actions, and what is fashion is called. Beautiful slogans are one after another, but no concrete actions can be seen. "Whoever goes through the back door will be dealt with" and "whoever intercedes will be exposed" seems to be very determined. In fact, there is no "follow-up", this "commitment" and that ". Very rarely, it gives people a feeling that everything will be fine as long as there is a "commitment". What is the actual situation? The anti-corruption situation is still very serious! "* * * Production Party is Action Party", but some people forget this. This practice of keeping anti-corruption on "beautiful language" generally belongs to the scope of "show".
The fourth feature of "putting on a show" is the so-called "new measures" against corruption, such as just beating gongs and drums, catching media fans with light energy and making many gestures, which is useless. For example, the so-called "anti-corruption from the doll" is suspected. This "new measure" looks very powerful, but it is actually a bit funny. The key to corruption is trading power and money. Where did the doll get the right? Where did you get this deal? For corrupt elements, it is useless to stare at the "small eyes" as big as table tennis. Their "weak little hands" can never pull back the "big hands of determined corrupt elements". This kind of anti-corruption practice, which only pursues superficial sensational news, generally belongs to the category of "show".
The fifth feature of "putting on a show" is that it can't grasp the main thing, and it pays attention to and vigorously attacks the "secondary" as the "main". For example, which is the "master" in terms of "clean government account" ("58 1 account" and "5 10 account") and "huge property with unknown source"? Of course, it is mainly based on "the source of huge property is unknown". Then, can the "clean government account" solve the problem of "the source of huge property is unknown"? The point is: "Dream on!" Therefore, my point of view is that if we want to master the "huge property of unknown origin" in reality, we must not only master it, but also make great efforts. If "institutional innovation" is carried out on this basis, I think China people agree with it, but some localities, departments and fields do not. Instead of focusing on the "significance" of "huge property of unknown origin", it is better to focus on ". This kind of anti-corruption practice that only regards "secondary" as "main" generally belongs to the category of "show".
The sixth feature of "putting on a show" is to turn the serious anti-corruption struggle into a "relaxing entertainment activity". For example, the so-called "anti-corruption poker" is an example. The procuratorate in a certain place put the charges and characteristics of 52 kinds of duty crimes on 52 playing cards in the form of cartoon exhibition, combining anti-corruption with entertainment. The red heart K in this set of poker describes the corruption phenomenon "sexual bribery" that has appeared in recent years. The picture shows a man lying on the beach, only covered with a towel, and above his head, a woman uses a skirt to shade him ...: I really don't want to put this practice on the "outline" of "is this anti-corruption or teaching people corruption", but it is ridiculous to downgrade an anti-corruption struggle with the nature of "life and death" to "combining anti-corruption with entertainment"! This kind of anti-corruption practice, which is more of a gimmick and has no substantive significance, definitely belongs to the category of "show".
……
In a word, I am opposed to treating any innovative anti-corruption measures as a "show", which is unfair and unfavorable to the anti-corruption struggle. But I firmly oppose those who leave the "main battlefield" of anti-corruption and "start a new stove". China's liberation struggle was won mainly through "three major battles". Imagine if the People's Liberation Army of China didn't focus on the "three major battles". In my opinion, the struggle against corruption today is no less difficult than the liberation war of that year. I often say that anti-corruption is a life-and-death struggle, and it is also a life-and-death struggle for corrupt elements. For corrupt elements, after the corruption problem is uncovered, the party ticket is gone, the position is gone, the reputation is gone, the official hat is gone, and everything is gone, so he can easily pass. " I don't believe you can type "Clean Park".
So, what is the "main battlefield" of anti-corruption? I think this is embodied in the tasks in 2005 which were studied and deployed by the Fifth Plenary Session of CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection. There are not many words, but they are the key to anti-corruption. If the anti-corruption agencies at all levels of ministries, provincial committees, municipal committees and county committees conscientiously and solidly follow the provisions in the documents, they will be so busy that they certainly have no time and mind to engage in this show and that show!