Many relocated households have such a blind obedience mentality. At first, they felt that the compensation price paid by the government was obviously unreasonable, but they could not provide corresponding reasons and basis to improve or support their reasonable compensation. This directly caused the government departments and the relocated households not to take the initiative to do the work from the beginning, often negotiated, and then shelved, cold war, and even threw out the threat that "the lawsuit will not increase the compensation."
The dialogue between the relocated households and the government was closed because the negotiation opportunity was blocked during the demolition. In order to complete the demolition task as soon as possible and realize the dream of other signed resettlement houses, the government has to resort to various other non-legal procedures and unofficial personnel to conduct indirect harassment. In fact, this makes the demolition work that should be carried out according to law, with some violent colors. For example, dumping muck at the door, blocking the keyhole with glue, sending terrorist threat text messages, cutting off water and electricity, and so on. This abnormal behavior of the government directly gives the relocated households an illusion that the government is a hooligan, so why can't we be hooligans? At this time, the idea of "fighting for my life" or "defending my home to the death" began to sprout in my mind, and gradually took root with the intensification of demolition methods.
Lawyer's suggestion: break this concept as soon as possible and return the method of safeguarding rights to the law. Because of the complexity of the demolition case itself, the broadness of the demolition law and the professionalism of the means of safeguarding rights, the relocated households are often at a loss in the face of demolition at home. In addition, because the main body of demolition is the government, and the demolition behavior is an administrative behavior formed by the joint efforts of many departments, it is obviously not easy to shake the interests of the government easily in the demolition. Therefore, it is particularly important for professionals to guide how to raise the compensation price. Moreover, under the guidance of professionals, relocated households are more likely to jump out of the strange circle of "paying for their lives". At this time, it is easy to meet the demand and establish another dialogue with the government by returning to rationality.
Two, in the process of demolition negotiations, to avoid deadlock, timely grasp the demolition information, moderate cooperation, but not too accommodating.
Many relocated households are still in the dark about violent demolition and feel that the government will meet their high compensation requirements. Obviously, such a one-sided idea will mislead your own judgment. However, in many demolition cases, the government rarely evaluates the value of houses from a neutral perspective. Therefore, the government's commitment to give high compensation is based on certain considerations. If you don't have corresponding chips or provide corresponding evidence to support it, it is still difficult for you to get compensation from the government yourself. Therefore, the process from the subject of expropriation to the subject of compensation is still the government, and it is impossible for the government to give a good price. The so-called care for you is more often a slogan.
What needs to be added here is that as relocated households, especially those who have become "nail households" and have not signed an agreement, it is also one of the ways to avoid the losses caused by violent demolition as soon as possible.
Third, in the process of violent demolitions, do not use physical resistance, take photos and videos carefully; Call the police many times in time.
In the process of violent demolition, the subject of demolition is by no means a unit or an individual. In addition, the demolition time is often chosen at night when there are few people and the attention is not high. At this time, the relocated households are almost isolated, and the relocation offices or developers who take violent demolitions are generally carefully arranged and planned for a long time. So they know very well what the relocated households will do and the corresponding countermeasures. Therefore, in order to better safeguard the rights and interests after forced demolition, lawyers suggest that relocated households should always put their lives first when they encounter violent demolition.
In order to preserve the evidence, some relocated households often choose to take photos and videos to fix the evidence, but this way will also pose a great threat to violent demolitions. Therefore, lawyers suggest that in the process of violent demolitions, once they find a safe place, they should leave the scene of demolitions in time and call the police.
4. After violent demolitions, seize the opportunity to defend rights, start negotiations or legal procedures in time, and never shelve demolitions.
After violent demolitions, many relocated households often choose to compromise, or they can't find the relevant compensation subject directly. After the forced demolition, some people choose to petition in the province or Beijing, hoping to reflect their experiences to the relevant departments, thus delaying the best opportunity to negotiate compensation. In the case of violent demolitions, violent demolitions have a great psychological impact on the relocated households. However, violent demolitions are more often the last resort of the so-called "last resort" of the government when the dialogue is deadlocked. Therefore, it is also the most desirable way for the government to establish a dialogue platform in time after violent demolitions.
At this time, if you are forced by the government's pressure or can't erase your face, or if the government directly puts the incident on the shelves, it is extremely important to find a third party to establish such a dialogue mechanism with the government in time. After the house is demolished, it does not mean that there is no need to pay compensation or the government can not pay it. Therefore, after violent demolition, it is very important for the relocated households to establish a consultation mechanism in time.