It is also an environmentally friendly sheep's head, and other works can at least point to something, while Bear Haunted simply sets the human species as the villain, and it is wrong to define what Logger Vick does. Criticizing human beings with distorted standards has a great influence on children's three views. Preschool children can only get a good impression from the picture of "ugly human beings" being fooled in the face of limited animation channels.

Most importantly, the square two bears are endowed with lazy, anti-intellectual and violent problem-solving settings. Whether Logger Vick cut down trees correctly or not, the animals headed by two bears didn't really fight to protect the forest, but their sleeping life was only disturbed by Logger Vick's livelihood behavior.

Aside from other arguments, even if everything Logger Vick did was wrong, his deforestation behavior was not punished or educated correctly. The main measures taken by the two bears are to fool Logger Vick's personal dignity, possess private property and destroy for the sake of destruction. Not to mention that in some plays, Logger Vick didn't cut down trees at all, and two bears just destroyed them for the sake of destruction.

This kind of revenge can't be regarded as tit-for-tat. In any case, it has the shadow of bullying the weak and fearing the hard. The cool feeling brought by this barbaric sensory experience makes children look at it with relish, and how it will be fed back to their social activities is creepy.

I don't think this question actually cuts into the essence. This work has nothing to do with "anything can be done under the slogan of protecting forests" It's just that they found a cheap and low-risk direction to get support under the double attack of domestic creative environment and personal talent. In addition to environmental protection, these people can also choose patriotism, nationality and filial piety. As long as they hook up with any one, no matter how bad or crooked the story is, natural politics will correctly block most critical voices and provide weapons for their sophistry. In fact, the benefits of doing so have already been reflected in this issue.

Of course, my comments above are only aimed at dozens of TV animations I have seen. There is a saying upstairs that the movie version is good, but I haven't seen it, so I don't rule out the possibility that the cinema version can get rid of this bondage, or that after the IP is on fire, it will be produced by other honest teams. But for the animation team, the shame of these dozens of episodes cannot be washed away.