After the news of Didi's obscure listing in the United States came out some time ago, many people had not had time to be happy for Didi, and then Didi received the audit requirements from relevant departments. Now Didi has been restricted from registering new users. Faced with the problem that many old users have also left, Didi's alleged illegal collection of personal information has once again become a straw to crush this enterprise.
Now, 25 related apps have been removed from the shelves due to illegal collection of personal information, but this is just the beginning of Didi. What is even more surprising is that the state department is ready to start a joint investigation. According to the announcement issued by relevant state departments, other state departments plan to enter Didi Travel to conduct a comprehensive review of network security.
If only one or two departments initiate the review, it may not have much impact, but the joint efforts of seven departments prove that the facts are not that simple. I thought Didi could perform better after a series of changes, but I didn't expect Didi to change to a new company, which made people guess. Is it that the network car giant intends to change a vest and continue to make money? Country: New companies should also be checked.
Relevant information shows that Didi has established a company named Beijing Didi Jubao Technology Co., Ltd. with a total registered capital of 5 million, which is wholly owned by Beijing Didi Unlimited Technology Development Co., Ltd. It is understood that the business scope of this company includes application software and basic software services. No matter the coverage, name and holding company of this company, it seems that it is just a "new device". But because it is a new company, it is still different from Didi's original company.
Because Didi is in the whirlpool of public opinion, their every move will make waves. It doesn't matter whether this quietly established new company wants to get rid of the golden cicada or wants to be reborn. What is important is that the state will not give Didi the opportunity to "turn over a new leaf" again and again, and will not let a company grow wildly.
If Didi's new company still has irregularities and is actually related to the holding company, then the fate of the new company is naturally the same as that of the holding company. Didi's current operation is actually like letting the new company be responsible for making money and making profits, developing the market behind everyone's back, and letting the old company take responsibility and accept censorship. In the long run, the risk will be minimized without delaying the company's profit.
If it is not for this purpose, Didi will become a new company at such a critical juncture, which has no benefits except increasing the cost burden, so most of it may be to avoid risks. If Didi wants to avoid state censorship through this small means, it may underestimate the capabilities of relevant departments. Therefore, whether they set up a new company or produce a new drama, the censors still have to review it, and even the new company is hard to stay out of it.
Moreover, it should be noted that the audit of the seven departments is definitely not a trivial matter, not to mention that due to the large amount of content involved, this audit will not end soon in a short time, and during this period, Didi will lose countless new users.
Although those old users will not be affected by this review and can still continue to use it, with the emergence of the survey results, if Didi is found to have new problems, it may be completely stopped. By then, no matter Sina users, they will not be able to use related apps normally.
So for Didi, what they need to consider now is not how to make money under the State Council's nose, but how to assist seven departments to complete the investigation as soon as possible. Even though Didi has been a popular travel software in China before, it does not mean that they can indulge themselves and be arrogant, nor does it mean that Didi can evade responsibility and punishment after making mistakes, and the state will not condone any violations. As an industry giant, Didi should know how to "lead an honest and clean life" instead of repeatedly consuming the trust of customers and the support of the state.