The national bourgeoisie is a new class spontaneously formed by backward nationalities to resist imperialist tendencies and plunder of raw materials. His advanced nature is embodied in two aspects:

1. By resisting the dumping and plundering of raw materials by imperialism, the national bourgeoisie weakened the power of imperialism in the colonies (though very limited) and increased the cost of maintaining the colonial system by imperialism, thus helping the working class in imperialist countries to confront the big capitalists. This is the property of the national bourgeoisie against imperialism and comprador.

2. Under the circumstances that imperialist commodity dumping destroyed the small-scale peasant economy in backward countries, the national bourgeoisie took the initiative to absorb a large number of landless peasants by investing in factories, making them become the working class in the modern sense, and made great contributions to stopping the feudalization of national colonies (the American Civil War was that the northern national bourgeoisie opposed the plantation economy of the southern colonies). A large number of peasants (with derogatory meanings) under the original small-scale peasant economy have become advanced workers of the revolution. This is the anti-feudal and anti-colonial nature of the national bourgeoisie.

First of all, the national bourgeoisie belongs to the bourgeoisie, so the problem is not established. I guess what the subject wants to ask is what is the difference between the national bourgeoisie and other bourgeoisie, and correspondingly there are bureaucratic bourgeoisie and comprador class.

Look at the bureaucratic bourgeoisie first. The bureaucratic bourgeoisie is essentially a group that benefits from the integration of military, political and business. He tends to maintain his monopoly by violent means, but this monopoly is ridiculous because imperialism will not allow monopoly groups to appear in its own colonies. However, the violent organs that the bureaucratic bourgeoisie relied on to maintain monopoly have now become living targets of imperialism. After several rounds of shuffling, the bureaucratic bourgeoisie will turn to comprador and become a complete reactionary.

Finally, the comprador. Compradors are not a class. He is an agent and vassal of imperialism in the colony. He is a nurse dog who belongs to the imperialist motherland spiritually.

We can see that the Kuomintang reactionaries headed by Chiang Kai-shek are the most successful representatives of the comprador. Their capital is in the United States (the deposits of four American families), their education comes from the United States, and the violent organs they depend on depend on American aid from head to toe. They should be called the governors' jurisdictions of the United States of America and the Republic of China.

At first, it was easy for us to find that the contradiction between the comprador and the national bourgeoisie was irreconcilable (causing civil war). This contradiction is essentially the contradiction between the monopoly bourgeoisie of all countries after the major capitalist countries in the world entered the imperialist stage and the global colonies and markets were carved up. So the difference between the bourgeoisie and the bureaucratic bourgeoisie lies in what means to occupy the market. The difference between the former two and the comprador is that one is mortal (the comprador hopes to stifle colonial industries in an all-round way in order to compete for a bigger market and more raw materials for the motherland) and the other is alive (the national bourgeoisie hopes to completely expel imperialist forces from occupying the domestic market and monopolize domestic raw materials and labor). This is also the root cause of the American Civil War and the Northern Expedition. For reference.