/view/121001.htm Baidu heteronomy encyclopedia.
/view/152112.htm self-discipline Baidu Encyclopedia
I give you these two contents because the main point of your argument lies in the struggle against these two concepts.
First of all, we should make it clear that in the debate, we should not make an absolute negation casually. We should admit that heteronomy is as important as self-discipline in safety production, but self-discipline is more important. Safety in production should be based on self-discipline and supplemented by heteronomy. In this way, there will be no obvious loopholes in your argument, otherwise, casually denying the existence of the other party's argument will lead to the instability of your argument. Can there be no other laws for safe production? Of course not, but heteronomy can only be the expression of external forces. Without the self-discipline of employees and operators, heteronomy can only stay in slogans and systems and cannot be implemented in practice. The system will become a dead letter and cannot be implemented. This is your basic point of view, which must be firmly grasped in any attack and defense. Never be led by the other side and deny the existence of heteronomy, which will lead to great loopholes in your argument. In this way, the other party can attack you. If safety production does not need other laws, then why do we need so many rules and regulations to regulate safety production? If this society does not need to rely on other laws, what is the significance of the existence of laws?
So you can't go on.
So what you want to attack is, if safety production can rely on other laws to meet the standards, what is the ultimate goal of repeatedly formulating rules and regulations and repeatedly conducting safety education? The other party is sure to avoid the heavy weight, just saying that for the sake of safe production, you can ask, does safe survival require employees to form safety awareness, and these norms and education are formulated to make them form such awareness? Since the ultimate goal of system and education is to require employees to form safety awareness, does it mean that the existence of heteronomy ultimately requires the formation of self-discipline? If the other party is not, then you ask, if the system and education are not to form employee self-discipline, then what is the significance of these heteronomy? No matter what the other party says, continue to ask, can the existence of heteronomy promote the effective formation of self-discipline in safety production and eventually form self-discipline operation? Remember, no matter what the other party says, the direction you should guide is that heteronomy serves self-discipline and exists for its effective operation. Therefore, self-discipline is the ultimate guarantee of safe production, and only the effective operation of self-discipline can ensure the absolute safety of packaging production. So your argument is logical. Remember, don't be confused at the questioning stage and don't be disturbed by the other person's ideas.