It can only be said that bosses from all walks of life are really different in style and cannot be unified. Generally speaking, a good company can at least make money, retain employees and be worthy of shareholders and customers.

To be a century-old shop, to create social value, and so on, the description of a good company on the tall side is relatively illusory before the company guarantees its survival.

Second, from the perspective of investors or shareholders.

In a capital society, in addition to the boss being a shareholder, there will also be investors introduced by various financing channels. Investors' money is not given for nothing, only good companies can get their favor.

Those companies that are in a good track and outlet, have a wide and deep moat, continue to grow like snowballing downhill, and their return on net assets is higher than the industry average all the year round, which are all good companies in the eyes of investors. For example, Coca-Cola, Nongfu Spring, Bayer Medicine, and so on.

You can write a book just from the perspective of investment. If you don't believe me, go online and search. There are a lot of beautiful things.

Third, the perspective of employees.

The above views of bosses and investors are also the views that employees can learn from. Otherwise, the pattern can only see the trees but not the forest, and it is easy to get lost in a small cognitive range.

In terms of career, it is good to bring rapid promotion to employees when they first enter the workplace; In the middle of the workplace, it is good to let employees show their talents on the platform; In the later stage of the workplace, money is much less, and it is naturally best to be close to home.