Current location - Quotes Website - Collection of slogans - Zhongan comment: What are the benefits of standardizing village-level organization work in promoting rural revitalization?
Zhongan comment: What are the benefits of standardizing village-level organization work in promoting rural revitalization?
Standardize the administrative affairs of village-level organizations. It should be said that this is a development direction of grassroots governance in the future, and it is also an urgent thing to do. Everyone has heard a saying that Yan is not as good as a kid, because when many people are doing things, he really went to a big administrative unit. This kind of service at the municipal and provincial levels will be more standardized, things will be handled according to the rules, and there will be no deliberate difficulties. But at the grassroots level, such as village-level villages, the governance organization is not necessarily.

To develop and revitalize the countryside, it is necessary for the people to effectively reduce the burden of work and reduce cumbersome processes, so that these grass-roots organizations of rural governance can truly play a governance role. Service loss rather than total management. Because we have always mentioned a word to serve the people, this is not just a slogan. Is the village official a big official? It wasn't him at all, but was elected by the villagers. He should serve the villagers instead of thinking about how to make things difficult for them. He should think about how to optimize the process and make things simpler and more convenient. This is his duty.

Standardizing the work flow of this grass-roots organization and strengthening the supervision of grass-roots organizations are of great help to rural revitalization. Because people from rural areas have a very direct experience that many things can't be done in the village, but no one can do it well. It may be said that the financial allocation is 200,000-300,000, but if it can really be used in the construction process and really improve the lives of ordinary people, it may be 60% or even 60%. Isn't this just that supervision is not in place? How can these problems arise when the supervision is strict enough and the organizational norms are mutually restricted?

Grass-roots organizations belong to the situation that mountains are high and emperors are far away. Provincial and municipal units are formal administrative units, and all have discipline inspection committees. Whether it is the supervision of the superior department or the internal supervision, his overall mechanism is relatively perfect. Grass-roots organizations such as village committees often lack certain supervision. The more such grass-roots places are, the more obvious nepotism and shady atmosphere are.