For some time, with Beijing promoting the function of relieving non-capital, a large number of illegal buildings have been demolished according to law. Interestingly, many illegal buildings were not known to the surrounding residents until they were knocked down. "It turns out that this house was built illegally." Many illegal buildings have existed for 10 years or even decades, and they are almost integrated with the surrounding buildings and residents' lives. People can't help asking: Why have the illegal acts not been corrected for so many years, and why did the former urban management "turn a blind eye" to the strange phenomenon of private construction for a long time?

"Wonders everywhere" is not only reflected in the handling of illegal buildings. In many places, many illegal and illegal phenomena that have been explicitly prohibited appear publicly. For example, it is stipulated that taxis can't "lie" on the streets with traffic jams outside the railway station, but there are always taxis there to attract business; Major hospitals have made many attempts to crack down on "number traffickers", but there are always number traffickers asking "Do you want a number" in front of the hospital? There are strict rules for keeping dogs in the city, but in the community, you can always see large dogs without chains running rampant. ...

Behind the "normal" is the lack of urban management law enforcement. In the short term, the indulgence of illegal activities will affect a specific person's affairs. In the long run, it will lower the taste of the city, damage the social atmosphere and undermine the authority of the rule of law. Not long ago, such a strange thing was exposed: thieves stole things in front, and citizens formed a circle behind them as spectators, but no one said anything, let alone stopped them. Tracing back to the source, this is the numbness of the public to the judiciary caused by "the law cannot be done". In a sense, Beijing's rectification of "digging holes in the wall" is just a "catch-up lesson" for lax enforcement of urban management in the past.

It should be said that in terms of urban management, we have formed a relatively complete system of laws, regulations and systems, and solved the problem of "laws to follow". Nowadays, the main problem before us is "lax law enforcement". Some systems are strict, but the law enforcement is loose and flexible, and it may or may not be implemented. In the long run, the system not only exists in name only, but also leaves a huge space for power rent-seeking. Some people don't think about how to obey the law, but how to find someone to "dredge" after breaking the law; Some people are lucky that the law does not blame the public, so it is "normal".

"The authority of law lies in the necessity of law", not in how severe the punishment is after breaking the law. Take illegal buildings as an example, not to mention fines and detention. Anyone who builds illegally will be demolished, and no one will build illegally again, and no one will "clear the relationship" and seek "accommodation". However, if there are illegal buildings, it will bring serious "broken window effect", so that more and more people will imitate them with luck.

In a society ruled by law, such "no wonder" is a disregard for the rule of law and a trampling on the rules. Both city managers and the public should dare to say "no" to illegal activities, and will never tolerate urban chaos such as illegal construction and opening walls and holes. Only in this way can urban management be "exquisite as embroidery" and social atmosphere be "benign" and "harmonious and civilized".

"The authority of law lies in the necessity of law", not in how severe the punishment is after breaking the law. The law takes precedence, so there will be no "normal" phenomenon, which is absolutely correct.