Sometimes, you have to go alone. This is not loneliness, but choice. We choose all the time, and what kind of life you choose will cost you. !

Please look at such a question and its ending:

Wild animals have no place in 2 1 century. Some people think that it is a waste of resources to stop these wild animals from becoming extinct. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

End 1:

Some people say that protecting wild animals is a waste of resources, but I disagree. It seems that we have to spend some time, wealth and manpower on this meaningless thing. In fact, we do it for ourselves. Let's protect wild animals now.

Comment: The first sentence at the end is a paraphrase of the views given by the examiner and should appear at the beginning of the article. The end is not a statement of the central sentence, but a summary of the full text. This composition should be firm and powerful, which seems to make it unconvincing and meaningless. The last sentence means shouting slogans, which is not in line with the habit of English argumentative writing. The same meaning can be ended by changing the objective and plain writing style.

Ending 2:

In a word, because of the far-reaching influence of wild animals on us, we can't live without them. Therefore, we should try our best to protect them. Let's remember one thing-protecting wild animals means protecting ourselves.

Comments: Double negation means emphasis, which is a common technique in English argumentative writing, making the ending firm and powerful. The far-reaching impact of the proved effect echoes the significance of wildlife protection mentioned in the article, making the article seamless. The author's point of view is exactly the same as that at the end of 1, but it is a very good ending with a plain statement tone and written idiomatic vocabulary.

Ending 3:

Of course, we can't eat without meat. Having livestock on hand can provide us with sufficient and nutritious agricultural products. Therefore, we don't need to turn to wild animals, especially endangered animals. Protecting animals means protecting our living environment. Everyone should work hard to protect the diversity of animals.

Comments: The author not only uses negative sentences to express emphasis, but also adopts a concession ending in time, pointing out that people certainly want to eat meat, but there are many domestic animals, so there is no need to kill wild animals, especially endangered species. The concession ending makes the article objective and fair, conforms to the requirements and habits of English argumentative writing, and is persuasive on the whole. Coupled with language success, authentic wording, such as living stocks, satisfying and nutritious, appealing, endangered, joint efforts and diversity, is the classic ending of the 8-point composition.