Everyone knows that there is no intermediate fossil;
Everyone in the world knows that all kinds of animal groups are suddenly produced;
No matter Darwin himself admitted that there was no evidence of intermediate fossils;
Whether "CAMBRIAN fossils prove that life on the earth suddenly appeared and took shape completely" or "no trace of the evolution of intermediate fossils was found", they all "confirmed the authenticity of the origin of species." People can even see: "As we all know, most of Darwin's evolutionism has been perfectly explained, and there are fossils and other evidence to prove the whole evolutionary process …"; Darwin's theory of evolution is a proven fact that man evolved from apes?
No matter how many scientists object with facts;
No matter the core leaders of "evolution" also admit that "evolution" or hypothesis can not be called conclusive;
No matter everyone knows that The Origin of Man has been included in the "six unsolved cases" of science;
No matter what the facts are, Darwin himself clearly wrote: "Many facts discovered by science are difficult to be explained by natural selection, and no one can answer them", but now the "evolution theory" on the Internet and bookstores is conclusive; Today's Darwin can explain and answer, but their level has greatly surpassed science and reached the artistic peak as famous as Zhao Benshan.
Page 2 14 ~ 2 19 of "Aliens and UFOs" published by Wanjuan Publishing Company of North United Publishing Media (Group) Co., Ltd., the best seller in Xinhua Bookstore, said: "The theory of evolution only constructs a rough theoretical framework about biological evolution, and many internal details have not been sorted out so far. In the past 200 years,' evolution' monopolized the dominant direction of biological research, but today people find that this guiding ideology may lead people into a dead end. The most obvious example here is anatomical medicine. Doctors are faced with the confusion of nerve transmission, consciousness chain, meridians and acupoints. On page 247, from the perspective of scientific argumentation, we can't help asking: Is human being the most intelligent creature on earth? Is the biological "evolution theory" still the supreme sacred "classic"? " Evolution misleads philosophy, sociology and biology, misleads people's thoughts and misleads our exploration of UFO and UFO science.
Darwin's Theory of Evolution, page 122: "Is it possible to form a new species just because of a small mutation of an individual? ..... It's hard to imagine that birds flying in the air just because of the slight variation of reptiles. In order to fly in the air, reptiles need many necessary changes: the forelimbs of reptiles should evolve into flying wings; The brain evolved to control wings; The bone is hollow inside, so you can lose weight. Just like a car, if you want to become an airplane, you have to make great changes from the appearance to the internal engine. It is hard for us to imagine that the above situation can be completed just because of the gradient. "
The article also admits that the last shortcoming of Darwin's theory of evolution lies in the contradiction between the fossils excavated so far and the animal textual research of the conclusions formed. So far, no intermediate fossils have been found in fossil research, which means there are still many unknown mysteries. ..... But so far, people haven't found a giraffe fossil with a middle neck. As long as we can't find the physical evidence in the middle of the evolution process, this mystery can't be completely solved, Darwin's "evolution theory" will be incomplete, and there will be objections and arguments. "
Indeed, no subject has influenced and seduced mankind for more than 150 years! This is Darwin's "scientific" achievement.
Analyze as a science:
First, according to what is taught in today's recognized biology textbooks, it is summarized as follows:
Compounds (biological precursors)-amino acids-polymers /RNA/DNA- single cells-(simple) plants and animals-(complex) plants and animals-apes-people. ? Three main ideas always come up:
1. Simple-complex (inanimate-living);
2. A long period of time;
3. No design (random, relying on accidental "natural process").
As a recent college biology textbook said, it is impossible to prove the theory of "evolution" by experimental verification and demonstration in a strict sense. There are several reasons, the most important of which is that evolution is a historical phenomenon.
Second, the summary of top scientists:
The development of molecular biology has also brought new problems to the study of evolution. 1968, Japanese geneticist Gen Kimura put forward the theory of neutrality, arguing that at the molecular level, biological evolution is not affected by "natural selection", but randomly mutates at a certain speed, which is neither good nor bad for biological survival. Kimura put forward this theory based on the protein sequence at that time. Since 1980s, a large number of DNA sequences have been determined, and the results show that the changes of DNA sequences are more in line with the neutral theory.
Although today's "evolutionists" have not completely abandoned the mutation theory, they have admitted that mutation has little effect in evolution, and most mutations (above 99.9%) are harmful, and of course they can't promote evolution.
Humans are born with immunoglobulin IgG gene. IgG gene produces a large class of immunoglobulins. Theoretically, there are as many as 654.38+08 billion kinds of antigens. Immunoglobulin is a specific antibody against external antigens, which have not yet come in (or even occurred). IgG gene has pre-stored the information of unknown antigen, and prepared the antibody preparation method to deal with it. This is incredible! Moreover, people may not encounter 654.38+08 billion kinds of antigens in their lifetime. This will throw away "natural selection" without a trace. Because it is information that didn't happen but had a role first, and "natural selection" has been used for a long time before it is preserved.
There is no fundamental change in genes, and all superficial changes are meaningless to evolution. Francis crick, the Nobel Prize winner and the first person to decipher the DNA code, concluded: "On this earth, life cannot be produced by any natural process."
Nowadays, the medical anatomy of human science has discovered countless delicate structural precise coordination that has not been discovered so far. It has witnessed that all living things must be complex, advanced and orderly as soon as they are born, but they gradually rot (degenerate)-until they die out of order. These don't need to go through the brain, they are all clear at a glance. If the "theory of evolution" is in trouble in nerve transmission, consciousness chain and meridians, it cannot be justified. Many relics before human history are not made by animals and cannot be explained by the viewpoint of "evolution". Darwinism holds that the continuous random evolution of biological evolution from simple to complex, natural selection, from disorder to order, and from low to high is meaningless to modern people.
On August 24th, 1999, Weekly Digest reported that Darwin's theory of evolution that all kinds of life have the same ancestor has been challenged recently. Doolittle, an evolutionary biologist at Dalhousie University, made a thorough microscopic study of various genes, and proposed that all life did not originate from the same ancestor.
Tencent Technology News (Stegosaurus/Compiled) 20 10 Ten Unsolved Mysteries in Science. According to a recent research article by the top scientists of American Life Science Network: "Is' natural selection' the only explanation that drives the evolution of complex organisms? Massimo from the Department of Biological Evolution at the State University of New York at Stony Brook? Pigo Liuxi? (massimo? Pigliucci) said: "At present, I think whether natural selection is the only process in biology that can trigger the evolution of complex organisms is still a huge mystery, or other material properties begin to work, and I guess the latter will also be proved to be correct." "
Darwin's "Evolution" program: "From the lower level to the higher level, human beings must go through the crawling stage". "Reference News" reprinted the article reported by the American interesting science website on August 10, but scientists found from some hand and wrist characteristics of human fossils that humans did not crawl as originally thought. Scientists have clearly told people that "human evolution has not gone through the crawling stage", which is enough to prove that there is no connection between human beings and apes.
According to the news report on the front page of Overseas Edition of People's Daily1999165438+1October 5, paleontologists in China made a major breakthrough in the study of the CAMBRIAN Big Bang: they discovered the oldest vertebrates "Kunming Fish" and "Haikou Fish" on the earth. The report said: "The CAMBRIAN Big Bang is the scale in the evolution history of life of the earth for 3.8 billion years. This is a shake to the traditional' evolution theory'. " From April 65438 to April 0995, the "Big Bang of Early Cambrian Life" was held in Nanjing, China, with the participation of paleontologists from the United States, Sweden, Germany, Britain, the Netherlands, Canada, Australia and other countries. International seminar ". At the meeting, Professor Chen from Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences said: The "CAMBRIAN Big Bang" theory led by Chengjiang animal fossils challenged Darwin's "gradual change" argument of "evolution".
As early as 200 1, 5 14, scientists with doctorates signed a statement questioning Darwin's theory of evolution. It is believed that the hypotheses of "random mutation" and "natural elimination" of "evolution" cannot explain the complexity of life and oppose and resist "evolution". Among them, biologists 154, chemists 76, physicists 63, including biological science, physics, chemistry, mathematics, medicine? Degree in computer science and related disciplines. Many of them are professors or researchers in famous universities and research institutions, such as MIT, Cambridge University, UCLA, Berkeley and Washington University. Among the scientists who signed the statement, some are members of the prestigious American National Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences. David Berinki, a mathematician and philosopher who signed this statement, said: "Darwin's theory of evolution is the biggest and useless thing in contemporary thought. It's big, but it's almost useless. This is a superstitious and awesome goal.
On August 1999, the Board of Education of Kansas passed a resolution to cancel the professor of "Evolution" from the science curriculum of public schools in the state.
Scientists concluded that:
(1). There is no evidence of the existence of biological precursor solution.
(2) Lack of intermediate fossils.
(3) The sudden appearance of complex life forms (especially in the lowest geological layer).
(4) Natural processes have proved that inanimate objects cannot become living objects.
(5) There is no reasonable mechanism to summarize and comment.
III. Summary of authoritative scientists of Evolution:
Stephen, a world-famous paleontologist and historian of science, is an authority on the theory of evolution? Jay. Gould Stephen? Jay. Gould said in the article on page 32 of Since Darwin: If this view of life is only a scientific theory about the evolution of biological species, it can be completely ended now, but it is just as well. But the problem is not that simple. With the social Darwinism, social biology and various forms of modern materialists' interpretation and utilization of "evolution", the concept of evolution has now become the basic theory of modern society.
He publicly admitted that the history of most biological fossils contains two characteristics that conflict with the gradual "evolution theory":
1, Stability: In the past, when most people lived on the ground, there was no sign of evolution or degradation. Most species have almost the same appearance when they appear in the stratum and when they disappear. Even if there is a change, it is very limited and does not show a certain evolutionary direction.
2. Sudden appearance: survey results around the world confirm that no species is gradually changed by its ancestors; On the contrary, all kinds of creatures have been "finished" when they appear. ?
"Evolution" scientist and New Zealand geneticist Denton (Michael? Dr Denton) solemnly said in his book Emergence Theory: Evolution Theory: "Darwin's theory of evolution is the biggest lie in the 20th century. Under the influence of this lie, human beings are rooted in animals, abandoned moral constraints, and their selfish desires developed out of control, creating a history of going astray. "
He said: "If there is no intermediate type or transformation type to fill the huge gap between existing species and biota, then the concept of" evolution "will never be taken seriously as a scientific hypothesis."
But Dr. Bolton also said: "The evolution of birds has other unique adaptability besides the complex origin of feathers and wings, which is enough to deny the specious explanation of' evolution'."
"Evolution" molecular biology, information science, mathematical probability expert York (Hubert? Dr. Yocky) said: "At least protein didn't happen spontaneously by accident, and it is impossible to accidentally produce life in the original liquid." .
"Evolutionary" biologist Koyuk (Francis? Dr Crick) concluded: "An honest man, armed with all our current knowledge, can only say that in a sense, the emergence of the origin of life, with so many conditions to meet its realization, is almost a miracle."
The famous evolutionist Del (niles? Dr. eldridge, librarian of the American Museum of Natural History in new york, said: "Natural selection will not produce new species."
The authors and spokespersons of "Evolution Theory" also take the small changes of the same species of plants (sometimes called "micro-evolution theory") as proof of evolution, but micro-evolution (small changes and variations) only involves small-scale biological changes (such as color, size and so on). )? Micro-evolution cannot produce new gene information, but can only recombine existing genes, and the gene pool remains unchanged. Micro-evolution can hardly be used to explain or prove evolution or macroevolution. The theory about the transformation of one animal and plant into another.
Mathews Matthews, a leading figure of British "evolution" and a professor of biology, admitted in the preface of the second edition of Darwin's Origin of Species: "Believing in evolution and believing in creationism are exactly the same, both of which have been confirmed by believers, but so far there is no way to prove it."
On page 557 of the revised edition of the Origin of Species (1995), Darwin called his theory "this view of life". If this view of life is only a scientific theory about the evolution of biological species, it can be terminated now, but it's just as well.
The famous British naturalist, the most outstanding leader in carrying out Darwin's "evolution theory", Thomas? Henry. Huxley said: "From a purely philosophical point of view, atheism is untenable."
1878, British theologian Edward? Dr Pussy criticized Darwin's On the Origin of Species from a theological point of view. Darwin said in a letter, "It is wrong for Dr. Pussy to imagine that I wrote" On the Origin of Species "for theology. I think anyone who is willing to take the time to read this book, especially the first few lines of the introduction, will know this very well ... I am interested in the so-called personality god? The belief in God is as firm as that of Dr. Pussy. " In the Origin of Species, Darwin used the word creator at least five times.
Fourth, Darwin's own summary:
Darwin believed that all species evolved from primitive single-celled organisms. As for this single cell? Where does life come from? Darwin did not give a clear explanation. But he doesn't believe that single-celled organisms can automatically evolve from inanimate objects. He still believes that there is an insurmountable gap between living things and non-living things. Therefore, he believes that the emergence of single-celled life needs an "initial push". As a driving force, of course, it is not automatic evolution, and it needs a promoter or driving force.
Darwin himself concluded that all species evolved from primitive single-celled organisms, but he did not believe that single-celled organisms could automatically evolve from inanimate objects. He still believes that there is an insurmountable gap between living things and non-living things. Therefore, he believes that the emergence of single-celled life needs an "initial push".
After the publication of the Origin of Species, Darwin admitted: "So far, every idea about eyes is shocking." In fact, exquisite organs are not just eyes! The brain, heart, digestive system, circulatory system, nervous system, muscle system, skeletal system and reproductive system are all very sophisticated and complex, and there is no room for any mistakes. It is also difficult to explain by "natural selection".
Origin of Species, translated by Xie Yunzhen and Chen Fu, Science Press, 1 August 9721day, p. 32 1 page: "It is thought that life and some of its abilities were originally injected into a few types or a certain type by the creator, and countless most beautiful and bizarre types continue to operate on the planet according to the established law of gravity. In order to prevent people from mistakenly thinking that his Origin of Species is a denial of God's creation of creatures, he made a special statement when reprinting this book in 1860: "I don't see any sufficient reason to prove that the concepts published in this book have any conflict with religion." Three years before his death, he wrote to his good friend Voldemort and said, "I have never denied the existence of the creator." ?
Darwin declared, "I have never been an atheist." Darwin recalled his life with mixed reputation. In 1876, he wrote an autobiography for his descendants and his wife. However, his son Francis? Darwin abridged and published this family biography autobiography in 1887, until 1958, Darwin's granddaughter Nora? Barlow just published the full text of his autobiography. The master of the history of science at that time? Roland? Aisley said, "No one can pretend to know Darwin without reading the autobiography of Darwin." ?
If you are a person who sincerely studies and develops Darwin's hypothesis, you will find that Darwin is not on the absolute opposite side of creationism. I don't know who put Darwin at the top of the anti-creationism-anti-moral flagpole for what purpose.
Is evolution a science?
What is Darwinian "evolution" today? Who will regard Darwin's "infinite random evolution" hypothesis as "science"? If "biology" is used, if it is really "natural selection, survival of the fittest", which pests and beasts are far more suitable for survival than humans, then the earth is full of harmful insects, poisonous snakes and ferocious beasts. Because they are the "strong and the fittest" who can survive in any environment, even some plants eat meat, and many extremely low-level insects and wild animals kill people with chemicals. "Survival of the fittest" makes people have nowhere to hide. Then people are just uncomfortable and can't exist on the earth long ago. Is there anyone else in the world?
Why only politicians get the treasure, but no real scientists pay attention to it?
The reason is that under the centralized and autocratic system of Catholicism in the Middle Ages, under the control of political empire careerists in religious cloaks, there have been many voices opposing the rule of the dark pope. People hate outdated feudal superstitions and moral constraints, and are eager to find new theories and morals to change the outdated status quo. Darwin's theory just catered to this political need at that time. It can also be said that this politician Darwin, represented by a "biologist", did a good thing at that time. Politicians urgently need to save mankind from the corrupt and autocratic Catholic centralization and find a theoretical basis.
At that time, the British Empire was the "home country" of constitutionalism after the industrial revolution and was in the stage of expansion. With the appearance of "legalized" privateering license, piracy, as a tool for the country to strengthen its navy, the maritime overlord of Britain began with a group of pirates. Speaking of ancient pirates, you will immediately think of Drake, the "royal pirate" who was the commander-in-chief of the Royal Navy. Someone once bluntly said: Britain is a large group of pirates, and Elizabeth is the biggest pirate leader. Even more coincidentally; /kloc-since the 0/5th century, British society has advocated people to express their opinions publicly, which naturally created conditions for Darwin to create a "hero" for himself. Because at that time, many people were confused between human ability and the authority of God, from theologians to scientists. Philosophers, especially politicians, prove it with great psychological support and theory. Carl. Marx wrote an inscription in his second edition of Das Kapital. Give it to Darwin. Call yourself an admirer of Darwin. Charles, 50 years old? Robert? Darwin searched for nearly 20 years, just when none of the fossil specimens found at that time could be regarded as transitional fossils and could not prove the authenticity of his paper. Darwin, who was very critical of the evidence, compressed the Origin of Species to about one third.
The fate of China is not much better than that of many countries ruled by imperialism and capitalism. In this semi-feudal and semi-colonial society, national crisis, cultural crisis, political crisis, social crisis and economic crisis broke out at the same time, seeking their own development path under the influence and impact of the world. Desiring to find a new morality that can change the bondage of old morality has also become the most urgent problem in China. 1894- 1895 The Sino-Japanese Sino-Japanese War of 1895 ended in China's defeat, which was also the historical background used by politicians and Yan Fu to introduce Darwin at that time. His outstanding feature lies in the creation of two influential social Darwinian slogans, namely "natural selection".
Unfortunately, what people see today are old scripts that are far away from the followers of Darwin's "evolution theory". They only rely on arguments and explanations, and they are ashamed to call names and belittle people. Sadly, people nowadays will never know its inner truth, but will just follow suit and drift with the flow.
Therefore, if you look up the history, you will understand why the Darwin hypothesis at that time was quickly pushed away, and it was all politicians, not "scientists". They are all in the political hall, not the biology laboratory. No scientific argument in the world has been inconclusive for more than 150 years, and it is only called "theory" (hypothesis). Who, a real scientist, has paid attention to the fact that human existence has been changed by "apes" If Darwin had a brain, who would say that his "theory of evolution" was "science"?
But today's real Darwinism also admits that "man did not evolve from apes, because genetics proved impossible." But that humans and apes have the same ancestor.
Reference news February 2009 18 edition 12 Reprinted in Spanish newspaper Le Monde February 10 Malcolm? Hones's article clearly tells people: "Darwin rarely wrote scientific papers, but the Origin of Species is worth reading as a literary work." The article clearly points out that Darwin and Lincoln are both epoch-making politicians, but the theme of the article is: "Darwin and Lincoln, who is the most influential great man in 19 century?" To sum up, the answer is "the balance is tilted towards Lincoln." The article also said: "Darwin read the economist Thomas? Two years later, Matthews' book about human plundering resources for survival established the theory of "natural selection". "
The so-called "science" applied to promote people's killing and struggle with each other is also the reason why Einstein expressed his dissatisfaction with the intelligence level and moral quality of "ordinary people". In his view, real science should be peaceful, friendly, caring, beneficial to mankind and unified with morality. It is by no means a "classic" that leads mankind to "the law of the jungle, the survival of the fittest", which is completely opposite to morality and "distorted" by these people.