Moreover, as far as relevant scholars are concerned, climate change has nothing to do with carbon dioxide itself. In other words, carbon dioxide will not cause climate warming, but it will shoot in the back.
From studying the surface of ice samples, there are many ice ages and high temperature periods on the earth, but this is obviously different from the level of carbon dioxide content. Historically, the temperature always reached its peak several centuries after it reached its peak, but after it reached its peak, it gradually became cold.
The researchers concluded that during the high temperature period, due to the gradual increase of temperature, a large amount of carbon dioxide in the ocean was released, resulting in a high carbon dioxide content. When the temperature gradually decreases, the release of carbon dioxide will gradually stop until it is not released, and finally carbon dioxide will be "recycled", so the temperature will be different from the carbon dioxide content.
From this conclusion, we can find that our previous understanding that carbon dioxide causes high temperature has no scientific basis. The final answer is that temperature affects the content of carbon dioxide.
So why does the climate change between hot and cold?
According to the researchers' research, the change of the earth's climate is closely related to the activity frequency of sunspots.
There are abundant cosmic rays in the universe, and when such cosmic rays act on the earth whose surface is 70% water, it will intensify the evaporation of water, turn it into water vapor, and converge into clouds. It is the Yun Qi that plays the role of heat preservation that makes the heat of the sun not directly return to the universe because of ground reflection, but bounce back to the ground here. So the earth's alternating heat and cold depends on these cosmic rays.
Cosmic rays themselves are almost constant, but they are influenced by solar activity. If sunspot activity is frequent, the burst impact will dilute cosmic rays, so the rare cosmic rays will lead to slow evaporation of water on the earth, thin clouds and poor heat preservation effect. On the contrary, the heat preservation effect is good. So experts come to the conclusion that the alternation of hot and cold on the earth is inversely proportional to sunspot activity.
Based on the above statement, we can draw the final conclusion that the process of climate warming is actually a normal change of the earth's climate. There was a warmer period on earth than now in history, that is, the Middle Ages, when the world society was quite rich, and most famous churches in Europe were built at that time, while in China, it was experiencing the peak of feudal society-Kaiyuan Shi Sheng! In addition, the industrial revolution was a famous ice age in history. At that time, the Thames was frozen, and vendors often set up shop on the ice in winter. So there is no problem with the climate, and the temperature changes are as normal as all the year round.
Then, why is the slogan of "low carbon" so loud when there is no problem with the climate?
In my opinion, the Copenhagen conference, said to be a conference to save the planet, is actually a political conspiracy by economically developed countries to restrict the development of developing countries, and the environment is just being used.
The global climate problem originated in Britain, and the initiator was Margaret Thatcher, the first famous female prime minister in Britain. Because of the acid rain phenomenon in Britain during her campaign, she put forward the campaign slogan of global environmental degradation and protection, which just catered to the psychology of two people. First, after World War II, because of the existence of the atomic bomb, human beings blindly realized that they had great power and thought that they could destroy the earth. The second is the fear of "having great power", which in turn will be destroyed by your own strength. So Thatcher took advantage of this slogan and became the first female prime minister in Britain. This law will be widely used by politicians in various countries in various political and economic fields, especially in the economic field.
The reason why developed countries have developed economies and high labor value is largely to exploit the labor force of third world countries, import cheap raw materials from third world countries, and then process them into finished products for sale, or even sell them back to third world countries to earn huge wealth! The only thing they have to do is to maintain this phenomenon, hinder the development of third world countries, and prevent third world countries from breaking this situation because of development.
As a result, big countries throw out the just banner of "energy saving, emission reduction, low carbon and environmental protection", shouting this slogan loudly and confidently, taking environmental protection as the commanding height of morality, and making them "take the environment as the emperor and make them disobey me". Anyone who doesn't listen to him can punish you with this, and it can be cruel. Just as Christians punished pagans in the Middle Ages, they can use the stake. You have to understand that reducing carbon dioxide emissions in developing countries means a decline in output and a slowdown in economic development. If we slow down, the advantages of developed countries such as the United States will become more obvious, and developing countries will never get rid of the fate of being exploited!
In particular, the United States, as the biggest victorious country in World War II, successfully carved up the economy after World War II. Its content is that Africa, Asia and South America export raw materials and cheap crude products, and the first and second world countries (North America and Western Europe) led by the United States are responsible for logistics, advertising marketing, design, packaging and retail. The final product is digested by the country or re-exported to developing countries. Among them, the profit from rough processing of raw materials export is the lowest, and the profits from logistics, advertising and marketing, design, packaging and retail are the most abundant, so western countries are rich and developing countries are poor. This was carefully planned by the western developed countries headed by the United States. Moreover, the United States itself is detached from the Kyoto Protocol, which is not accidental, but inevitable. How can you be deceived by your own lies?
However, developing countries are not necessarily satisfied with the status quo, and they are all striving for development. But if developing countries develop to the point of destroying the world economic structure planned by western developed countries, the west can no longer tolerate it. They carefully concocted "protecting the world environment", a fat liar who can go down in history! !
So the so-called climate crisis may not exist at all, there is unfair confrontation between countries, politicians will always be dark, and this is still a world of the jungle. If there is a climate crisis, it means that the economically developed countries, led by the United States, create the illusion of climate deterioration to exploit developing countries. In fact, this society is nominally protecting the environment, but in fact it is destroying the environment. The material used in solar panels is polysilicon, which is very harmful to the environment in the manufacturing process. This is the real source of our environmental crisis. Garbage siege and water pollution are the real culprits that threaten us and nature! Not carbon dioxide. As Switzerland, what we want to maintain is a more fair and just world development, not a vampire holding a seemingly just banner and hiding the sun behind it!