Want to be vicious? Ha ha laugh ...

Then I'll give you a more vicious one:

Does the other debater think that the quality of Guangzhou citizens is really bad to the degree of "urgency"? Is it really not enough to run the Asian Games well unless the quality of Guangzhou citizens is improved immediately? ! !

I believe that the other party dare not directly say that "the quality of Guangzhou citizens is poor", but can only compare them to show that the former is more important.

But we must remind the judges and the audience repeatedly that who is more important and who is the "most important" are two different things!

Speaking of "dispatch", Guangzhou still has many shortcomings in hardware, even to the extent that it may affect the competition, such as traffic problems and so on. I'm sure your team has prepared a lot of materials in this field.

Then, the proper use of these materials shows that some deficiencies in the current hardware facilities may completely make the game unable to function normally; On the contrary, the quality of Guangzhou citizens is not low in China or even in Asia. We don't object to further improvement, but that is icing on the cake rather than a top priority! ! !

===========

Also, our side supports "hardware facilities", so the other side is likely to steal the concept, saying that software needs immediate improvement more than hardware. We must make it clear that citizen quality belongs to only one software, not the whole software. If the other party generalizes, we should point it out at once.

===========

Looking at the debate in grade one, I think the positive side is more favorable, because from the emotional factor, most people will think that "talent is more important than the so-called hardware facilities"

But after the analysis, I think there is still a lot to say if we can successfully get the other party into the dilemma of "the so-called top priority is because it is too low".

Finally, the goal is not far away, work hard! Wish you success! ! !