Both sides of the debate: Sichuan team (positive) VS Hunan team (negative)

Positive view: Gong Yu is moving mountains.

Objection: Stupid old man is transferring people.

Positive debaters: Cangxi Baijiang Chen Tingjie, Pengxi Baijiangjin, Ziyang Baijiang Wang Quanzhong, Baijiang Investment.

Counterparty debaters: one argues against Tu Yanqun in Chenzhou, one argues against Yunnan, three argues against Binqin in South Jiangxi, and four argues against Changsha.

Judges: Qiqihar Baijiang Liu Haidong, Benxi Baijiang Xu Lijun, Qingyuan Baijiang Wang Pinhui, Nanjing Baijiang Xu Zhong, Nanjing Baijiang Xuchun, Baijiang Investment Gao Rongxiang and Baijiang Investment Cong Shufeng.

□ make a statement

A positive debate: Dear host, other debaters and colleagues, hello! On the question of whether Gong Yu moved mountains or people, our view is that Gong Yu moved mountains. I will discuss it from the following five aspects:

First, Gong Yu faced up to the difficulties in life, did not avoid the contradictions in reality, and proceeded from reality. Touching people is a typical behavior of avoiding contradictions, a selfish and palliative approach, and a metaphysical point of view.

Second, Gong Yu chose to move mountains and rivers and face up to contradictions, which not only solved the problem of "wandering in and out", but also provided a broader development space for his hometown.

Thirdly, Gong Yu's perseverance and unremitting struggle in moving mountains has become the main body of the Chinese national spirit. In history, when our motherland was invaded by foreign enemies, could we still sit here and participate in the debate today without the struggle and sacrifice of countless people like Yu Gong?

Fourthly, after Gong Yu moved mountains, the transportation was convenient, which was more conducive to the exchange of information and materials with the outside world. Because it is impossible to develop productive forces without solving traffic problems.

5. The process of "Gong Yu moving mountains" is actually a microcosm of human society transforming nature and overcoming difficulties in the process of development. "Gong Yu's spirit of moving mountains" can make the productive forces develop and progress continuously. If Yugong doesn't move mountains, he will not only give in to difficulties, but more importantly, he will lose the opportunity to develop in the challenges.

In short, no matter in what era, Gong Yu Mountain is a spirit worthy of promotion and development, and it also embodies the team spirit of Gong Yu family's firm belief and Qi Xin's concerted efforts to take care of the overall situation. I believe that in the future study and life, the other debater will join us and prove this truth countless times with practice, that is, "the development and progress of society need a foolish man to move mountains."

Refutation: Thank you, Madam President. Good morning! Start from the beginning and identify the source. Today, our debate is "A foolish man moves mountains or the immigration department?" This debate is not whether the spirit of Yu Gong deserves admiration, but whether Yu Gong's method is desirable. What we should argue is whether the foolish old man's way of thinking in analyzing problems is correct and whether it is reasonable to choose a solution to the problem. Therefore, on the basis of judging whether it is desirable to move mountains or move people, both sides of today's debate choose their own optimization schemes. Our view is that "fools touch people" for three reasons:

First, the other debater just talked about the importance of the spirit of being foolish, but logically speaking, the spirit of being commendable does not mean that you should. There is no logical connection between the two. According to dialectical materialism, people's subjective initiative is important, but it must be based on respect for objective laws, otherwise it will be counterproductive. You should not only dare to do things, but also do good deeds. Even if we talk about the spirit, we should fully analyze the connotation of "foolish spirit", such as the spirit of "man can conquer nature" and "paternalistic authority" which is worth reflecting.

Secondly, we believe that "fools are transferring people" because "doing the right thing is more important than doing the right thing". Like other friends, we also believe that great achievements can be achieved only with firm faith and sufficient confidence, but only if the goals and ideas are correct. Gong Yu moved mountains because the inconvenient traffic affected his quality of life, but can he only move mountains to improve traffic? Is it feasible to move mountains? It is precisely because of the incorrect goal of moving mountains in Gong Yu and the lack of feasibility of the project that the performance appraisal result of "commendable spirit and poor ability" was obtained. In the ending of the story, "A Mountain with a Yugong", the mountain was not moved by Yugong, but by "the emperor ordered the second son of Kuafu's family to bear the second mountain". Mr. Nathan Chen, the chairman of the board of directors, has long said that "without a savior, we can do our own thing, we can do our own thing, and we can do our own thing". Therefore, when we do project investigation or decision analysis, we should first judge what is right with a rational attitude and scientific methods, and then do things right.

Third, the transfer of fools embodies the scientific spirit of seeking adaptation in pragmatism and seeking development in response. After SWOT analysis of Yu Gong's living environment and available resources, we decided that the solution to the problem of Yu Gong's wandering in and out was "recruiting people". The scheme of "moving people" has low cost, good effect and feasible project; Pay attention to environmental protection, respect human nature, have win-win thinking and awareness of resource integration. Touching people is to break the closed and rigid thinking mode and advocate the thinking mode of combining efficacy, with the goal of creating a society in which man and nature live in harmony.

Based on the above points, we think that "Yu Gong moves mountains".

Two arguments: Our view: Gong Yu is going to move mountains. In the long history of human development, up and down for 5,000 years and 8,000 miles, every progress of human beings has been made by confronting and fighting against difficulties. Just as we, Baijiang, will encounter difficulties of one kind or another in the process of development, it is impossible for Baijiang to develop into such a splendid place today, let alone move from one glory to another, if we avoid and cringe when encountering difficulties. In the face of difficulties, Gong Yu stepped forward with a responsible attitude, which reflected Gong Yu's simple outlook on life and value pursuit. Only when we Baijiang people as a group and individuals have the most basic mental state and responsible internal quality can Baijiang become a real gas expert. In the age when Yu Gong lived, mankind was in the age of ignorance. Few people have the courage and confidence to face the powerful nature. Yugong not only faced up to the reality in life, but also expounded his unique opinion, that is, the spirit of "endless descendants" Such courage and boldness have gone far beyond the age of foolish old man's life, which greatly inspired people's fighting spirit. Today, we should inherit the spirit of the foolish old man moving mountains, dig more mountains, create greater wealth and make greater contributions to mankind.

Counterargument: Our argument has been expounded from a logical point of view. Next, I will explain our point of view in theory:

Under the historical environment in which Yu Gong lived at that time, what Yu Gong wanted to solve was the traffic problem. Today's debate actually gives Gong Yu two choices, one is to move mountains, and the other is to move mountains, that is, to move people. Facing the choice, the key is how to think rationally and make a rational choice! What is the standard to measure whether the method is desirable? The theory of economics tells us that the standard is "low cost, high efficiency, low input and high output".

As far as moving mountains in Gong Yu is concerned, first of all, in order to solve the traffic problem, Gong Yu and his children and grandchildren wasted all their good time on digging stones and moving earth, which greatly wasted manpower, material resources and financial resources, and the cost was huge. Life is only once for everyone. Should this once-only life be used to move mountains? If your opponent's friend unfortunately becomes Gong Yu's son and grandson, can you still stand here and stick to your point of view?

Secondly, Gong Yu violated the laws of science and could not succeed objectively. It should be noted that "Taihang Mountain and Wuwangshan Mountain are 700 miles square, and Wan Ren is taller". Roughly calculated, the two mountains have about 23.4 trillion tons of earth and stone. Gong Yu transported soil to "the end of Bohai Sea, the north of Tibetan soil", only once a year, with 5 tons each time, which took 5,000 years. Scientists tell us that the total life span of the earth is about 65.438+0 billion years, which means that when human beings have moved their homes into space, Gong Yu has not destroyed the corner of the mountain!

Third, Gong Yu moved mountains, destroying the beautiful natural environment and ecological balance. Today, more and more attention is paid to ecological consciousness, and we do not advocate Gong Yu's solution to the problem. "People are taught by heaven and earth, and everything is Zhong Ling", so we should live in harmony with nature and carry things well. If you break the ground and dig indiscriminately because of "detour", isn't it "there are no birds in hundreds of mountains and no footprints in thousands of paths"? Today, with the promotion of harmonious development and harmonious society, should we move mountains?

Let's analyze the situation of transferring foolish men to other people.

First of all, it may only take a few days and a half for Gong Yu to move out of the mountains, which solves the traffic problem with low cost and high efficiency!

Secondly, the ultimate goal of moving people or mountains is to better communicate with the outside world. Since solving the same problem, we should choose a realistic and feasible method. Touching people embodies the spirit of seeking truth from facts. Creating openness and mobility is where historical progress lies. Since moving mountains costs so much money, it is better to move people here from reality.

On the one hand, it is futile to move mountains, on the other hand, it is half the effort; On the one hand, it is the hard work and sweat of moving mountains, on the other hand, it is the wisdom and courage of moving; On the one hand, it is helpless to close the mountain village, on the other hand, it is wonderful outside. Where to go, I believe you will make wise choices.

In a word, we think Gong Yu should transfer personnel.

Three arguments: Yugong Yishan is a famous fable in ancient China, and this story is a household name. From an early age, the teacher taught us not to be discouraged when encountering difficulties, and to learn the spirit that fools are not afraid of hardships and any difficulties; Dare to transform and conquer nature; Dare to struggle, dare to win. Gong Yu moved mountains to emancipate the mind and blaze new trails. This is to think what our predecessors dare not think and do what others dare not do. Didn't Gong Yujia want to move mountains with hoes and baskets? Don't we also advocate this spirit of emancipating the mind, pioneering and innovating, and boldly practicing today? Does Baijiang culture also have the word "creation"?

Throughout the history of China, there are many examples to prove that Gong Yu moved mountains.

One, more than 60 years ago, at the Seventh National Congress of the Communist Party of China, Mao Zedong United and led the broad masses of the people, overcame all difficulties and obstacles, removed the three "mountains" that weighed on our heads, and won the revolution.

Second, Dujiangyan, a famous river in Sichuan, used to be a fast-flowing river in the upper reaches of Minjiang River. After entering guanxian, the terrain suddenly became lower, the water potential slowed down, a large number of sand and gravel silted up, the river silted up and often flooded. Under the auspices of Li Bing and his son, he led the vast number of migrant workers to move away from the piles, built diversion dikes and dams on the piles, and dispersed the water flow of the Minjiang River, which not only prevented floods, but also facilitated shipping and irrigation, making the Chengdu Plain a "land of abundance" with guaranteed harvest in drought and flood. Up to now, people in Chengdu Plain are still enjoying the beautiful life created by the ancients. This shows that the decision of Li Bing and his son to move mountains at that time was correct, and Gong Yu's practice of moving mountains deserves praise for thousands of years.

Isn't the Qinghai-Tibet Railway, which we call Tianlu today, the best embodiment of moving mountains? If there is no Yugong moving mountains today, can the train automatically climb mountains and mountains? It is we builders with the spirit of ignorance that built the Qinghai-Tibet Railway in just a few years.

Let's look at another example of a fool's transferor.

Li Hongzhang's "Westernization Movement" in the late Qing Dynasty is a typical example of foolish people moving the people. He bought machines, set up factories and sent people to study abroad in order to solve the situation that the old China powers were looking around and their national strength was declining. Faced with the "mountain" that feudal monarchy claimed to be closed to the outside world by China, he chose a method with little harm and low cost, that is, moving mountains without moving people. The final result was the signing of a series of treaties on the loss of power, which led to the complete collapse of Qing control.

The fable of one mountain in Gong Yu embodies the most valuable quality, that is, the firm confidence of Gong Yu's family and the team spirit of uniting as one and Qi Xin working together. Doesn't this reflect the theme of our forum "professional team"?

Therefore, I reiterate our view that Yugong is moving mountains.

Three opposing arguments: the former argument and the two arguments fully prove that Gong Yu moved people rather than mountains from the logical and theoretical point of view, and the answer is obvious. Now, let's go back to history and reality and see if Gong Yu has moved mountains or people.

We believe that "a foolish man and a mountain" is an act that violates objective laws and unilaterally emphasizes subjective initiative. History has taught the people of China a profound lesson. Let's go back to the painful 1958: China people hold the spirit of "fools move mountains" and put forward the slogan "man can conquer nature". Steelmaking by the whole people, the grain output was boasted four times, the national economy was paralyzed, and a large number of China people died of malnutrition. According to the population statistics released by the China government, the death toll caused by the famine caused by the Great Leap Forward was 35 million. 35 million, what a terrible number! In this "Great Leap Forward", the number of people who starved to death in three to five years exceeded the sum of all the people who died of natural disasters in 2000. What a disaster this is!

Why did such a tragedy happen in the history of China? It was at that time that people made the same mistake as Gong Yu who moved mountains, blindly believing that subjective initiative could create everything and not respecting objective laws.

On the other hand, we believe that the cost of migration is low and the income is high, which has been fully proved by history and reality. Gong Yu once said that his descendants are infinite, so let's see what Gong Yu's descendants are doing. In order to improve the living environment and protect the ecological balance, nearly 4,500 descendants of Gong Yu, the hometown of Gong Yu in Jiyuan City, Henan Province, moved out of the mountains and developed the King of Wu Taihang into a tourist attraction, and their living conditions were completely improved. Coincidentally, millions of immigrants from the Three Gorges Project created a miracle in the history of human reservoir immigrants. Is this a historical coincidence? No, great thinkers have pointed this out long ago. There is a saying in Zhouyi: If you are poor, you will change, and if you change, you will pass, and the general rules will last for a long time. People must find ways to change in the predicament, and only change can continue to develop and succeed.

At present, China's Baijiang LPG enterprises are exploring new retail model reform. Isn't it because Baijiang people know how to be flexible and seek long-term development? In addition, if all our professional managers cling to the small-scale peasant consciousness of Yugong and stand still, what can we do for the expatriates who have left their homes?

Facts speak plainer than words. On the one hand, it is the devastation and famine brought by the relocation of mountains in Gong Yu, on the other hand, it is the long-term development of the relocated people to live and work in peace and contentment. History and reality have fully proved our view that Gong Yu moved people, not moved mountains.

□ Attack and debate issues

Four arguments against it: do we emphasize people's subjective initiative in the face of difficulties, or do we solve difficulties in a realistic way with scientific methods?

Four arguments: I think your question is beside the point. Is the topic of our debate moving mountains or people? Our first three debaters have proved a very simple truth from all aspects. Moving mountains is certain, and they can't move with hoes.

A positive statement: China's Tibet is facing Mount Everest, which should be said to be higher and bigger than Taihang Mountain and Wuwangshan Mountain. Do you want people living in Tibet to move to the Central Plains?

Three arguments against it: I think everyone has seen Ge You's depiction of the Himalayas in "Be there or be square". Is it possible to improve living conditions in people in Xizang by removing the Himalayas? In 2004, Xu Benyu, one of the top ten figures in China, gave up the bustling city life after graduating from college and went into the depths of the mountains to teach, shouldering the responsibilities that he should not have shouldered. His spirit is as commendable as a fool's work. But I asked another debater, should each of us go to teach in the mountains like Xu Benyu? Then each of us won't have to sit here for the meeting.

Four arguments: you are arguing irrationally. In the eight years of the Anti-Japanese War, if we are resettling the population, may I ask other debaters, are we going to emigrate to the whole country?

The opposing side argued: But don't forget that the Red Army's 25,000-mile long March was not for moving people.

Four arguments: No, the Red Army's 25,000-mile long March is to move mountains, and to move the "three mountains" above our heads in an appropriate way.

Three arguments against the other side: Yes, the purpose of the other debater is the same as ours, all of which are to move the "three mountains", but only if people are moved here first.

□ Free debate

Just now, the opposing debaters put forward many of their arguments and arguments, but we think their arguments and arguments have deviated from the theme of today's debate. The theme of our debate today is whether Gong Yu is moving mountains. We have proved from all aspects that Gong Yu is moving mountains. Including the fable itself, tells us that they moved the sky when they moved the mountain, and sent two immortals to move the mountain on the last day. This story also shows that moving mountains is an unchangeable fact.

Objection 3: Why is it impossible to say that Yu Gong moved mountains? Metaphor means metaphor and image. Does this mean that Gong Yu moved the mountain? If history proves that the foolish old man moved mountains, do we still need to debate here today?

Argument: China will face many problems in its reform and opening up. If this is your attitude, I advise you to buy four tickets to America.

On the other hand, the opposing party argued: If we follow each other's ideas, should we go to Beijing to participate in the debate today?

Four arguments against the other side: Just now, the other side argued that moving mountains was in a responsible attitude. Are you responsible for your descendants? Are you responsible for nature?

Positive statement: The story of Gong Yu moving mountains inspired the people of China to overthrow the "three mountains". I would like to ask other debaters, isn't this what we want to carry forward?

Four arguments of the opposing side: Are they stupid? They pay attention to methods, comrade!

Four arguments: in our work and life, in fact, many times we make excuses in the way we do things. Your relocation is actually an excuse, an excuse to escape from reality and difficulties.

Argument of the opposing side: If the opposing side's argument is that moving people means running away, then why is it said that the spirit of Three Gorges immigrants is the patriotism of coordinating the overall situation, the dedication of sacrificing oneself for the public, the spirit of cooperation with one heart and one mind, and the spirit of hard work?

Four arguments: The Three Gorges immigrants you mentioned actually prove that we are moving mountains, moving people and building dams.

Third defense: remind the other debater that you just said to withdraw people. Isn't this our view?

Four arguments: you are stealing concepts.

The opponent thinks that the Three Gorges Project should also pay attention to methods, and Dayu pays attention to dredging rather than water blocking. This is the nature of Taoism and respects objective laws. Gong Yu Yishan is not a super girl. You can sing if you want.

Four arguments: The so-called unblocking is actually two ways, which can only prove that Gong Yu is dealing with the problem by blocking, but in the end, Gong Yu is still moving mountains.

The opponent argues: but the data has shown that the earth is finished and the mountains have not moved, but if the mountains are sentimental, they will be old!

Four positive arguments: Gong Yu moved mountains. In fact, he was looking at the problem from a developmental perspective. At the age of 90, he also proposed moving mountains.

Counterparty: It is precisely because he is 90 years old that we wonder if he is senile.

Positive four arguments: this is the spirit we want to advocate, the spirit of giving up who I am and not being afraid of difficulties.

Opponents think: Excuse me, is my opponent, Gong Yu, an idealist or a materialist?

Two statements: He is a combination of idealism and realism.

Three arguments against it: Just now, the other side thinks that Yugong's moving mountains is divorced from reality and moving people is to escape contradictions. We think Yu Gong's idea is too selfish. He wants to move mountains by himself and then impose his ideas on his descendants. Isn't this a matter for feudal tyrants? Must we learn from his spirit?

Three Arguments: In the fable of "One Mountain in Gong Yu", the most valuable quality is Gong Yu's firm belief and teamwork spirit, which is just like the theme of Baijiang Forum we see today: professionalism and professional team.

The defense: Excuse me, the defense debater, when the Titanic met an iceberg, did it hit it to move the mountain or bypass it?

Four arguments: The example you cited deviates from the topic to be debated today.

Three arguments against it: We think this example has an inevitable relationship with today's debate. Just now, the other three arguments said that we should have firm confidence and sufficient confidence. Yes, this is necessary for us to achieve our career, but only if we have correct beliefs. Yesterday, Mr. Xu Zhong also said in his speech that wrong instructions combined with crazy execution would be an irreparable disaster.

A positive argument: our socialist construction is facing many difficulties and problems. Will you choose to avoid at this time? Will our northwest become a no man's land?

Three arguments against it: should we move all the mountains in the northwest? Do you know that there are 100 thousand mountains in Guizhou, and one of them has been moved?

Positive argument: Then why does our country advocate building a new Tibet and a new Xinjiang?

Three arguments against it: Yes, so we should pay attention to methods, instead of all our children and grandchildren waving hoes and digging mountains.

Four arguments: your so-called method is to move everyone. It is one way for you to move, but if you move to a place and encounter difficulties and move again, will your children and grandchildren keep moving forward indefinitely?

Three arguments of the opposing side: does the other side think that we should not solve the problem if we move people? Isn't it difficult for the Three Gorges immigrants to need how many immigrant villages and how much support they need from the state? Similarly, our immigrants should bravely shoulder their responsibilities, face difficulties and solve them.

There is a certain saying: the construction of the Three Gorges Project is to carry forward the spirit of our foolish old man moving mountains. This is the greatest and most macroscopic project in our country, not moving people but moving mountains.

The opponent argues: Yes, when we evaluate these great projects, we will say that merits are in the present and benefits are in the future. But when Gong Yu moves the mountains, can he finish it? Can he finish moving in the present era? He dragged down his children and grandchildren and moved mountains from generation to generation. Is he good for the future? What if his descendants don't want to move mountains and want to be professional managers in Baijiang?

Four arguments: the other side has moved the debate elsewhere. What we need to confirm now is whether we are moving mountains. From the story itself and Comrade Mao Zedong's speech, we can understand that Gong Yu is moving mountains.

Four arguments are against each other: I want to remind the pros to see clearly that our argument is whether Gong Yu will move mountains or people, not moving mountains, not ing, not the present progressive tense.

A positive statement: the spirit of "foolish man and one mountain" has inspired our generations. Now we should carry forward this spirit. Can our cause be successful without the spirit of "foolish man and one mountain"?

Three arguments against one side: I want to remind the other side that it is precisely because of Gong Yu's spirit of moving mountains that during the Great Leap Forward, 1 654,38+0 people died in Sichuan, with an average of 1 person in every nine people.

Four Debates: Without the spirit of "fools move mountains", we in War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression would not have won, and it would be impossible for us to sit here and debate happily today.

Objection 3: We don't deny Gong Yu's indomitable spirit of moving mountains, but Gong Yu's moving mountains also contains the spirit of man conquering nature, the consciousness of small farmers and self-restraint. Is it worth learning?

Four arguments: moving is a family, because you want to escape.

Positive argument: Gong Yu's spirit of moving mountains is a spirit of contribution. He didn't enjoy it, let alone avoid contradictions.

Three Objections: If he is enterprising, why didn't he put forward the idea of moving mountains until he was 90 years old? How many years can he live? This work has been finished by his children and grandchildren.

Four arguments: this just shows that he is advancing with the times. At the age of 90, he is still making progress and doing things that others can't do.

The opponent argues: then I will advise the other party, if it is not worth doing, don't do it.

Three arguments against it: in fact, what we are debating today is not the spirit of being foolish, but the key is the method. Choose a low-cost and efficient method to do everything. I would like to ask another debater, if we face a river, should we go around it, or should we drink the river before crossing it?

Four arguments: We will build a bridge to cross it. (It's time for the square)

Three arguments of the opposing side: The opposing side has repeatedly stressed that Gong Yu is moving mountains, and it is not possible to move if it wants to. Our second argument just said that Gong Yu will need 654.38 billion+000 billion years to move this mountain. Obviously, even God thought that Gong Yu could not move the mountains, so he sent Kuafu's second son to bring them back. In order to fulfill his wish to see the sea, an old man like this, we should do our best to help him move and help him move out.

Four arguments against it: If Gong Yu doesn't take the time to move people, communicate with the outside world more, and don't marry, in the long run, there will be consanguineous marriages in that small village, so people in this small village will become less and less smart and finally have to move mountains.

Objection: Diligence is not the whole spirit of the Chinese nation, but pragmatism and flexibility.

□ Concluding remarks

Four arguments against the opponent: I am very happy to discuss with my opponent the topic of "Yugong moving mountains or moving people". We are arguing with each other, but the essence of the problem is: how do we deal with difficulties in a simple and efficient way? We found that our opponents' original intentions remained unchanged and their methods were biased. Next, please allow me to point out several problems existing in the other party's defense friends:

1, blindly optimistic.

2. refer to a deer as a horse.

3. Tang Yang stops boiling. Spirit deserves respect, but it doesn't mean you should do it.

Just now, we analyzed and demonstrated "Yu Gong Yi Shan" from the aspects of theory, logic and facts. We think the foolish old man moves mountains. Below I will further demonstrate from the value level.

First of all, only by "touching people" can human progress be realized. "Migrating people" is the history of the development of human civilization. Humans changed from climbing to walking upright, started digging holes, moved out of caves to slash and burn, moved out of closed mountain villages to start commercial civilization again, bid farewell to small-scale peasant economy and moved towards industrial civilization, constantly "moving" and making progress.

Secondly, "transforming people" is to break the closed and rigid thinking mode and advocate the modern thinking mode of combining efficacy. Today, our Baijiang River has gradually developed and expanded, going out of three townships and four waters to East China, going deep into Tianfu to South China and turning to Northeast China; From the initial bottling business to today's pipeline business, and then to value-added services; From fragmentation to integration of various resources. Which place does not reflect the "touching" thinking of Baijiang people, and which point does not reflect the modern thinking consciousness of Baijiang people's combined efficacy?

Thirdly, "changing people" also embodies the spirit of seeking change, seeking truth from facts and respecting science. If you don't respect science, don't seek truth from facts, don't take change as the ultimate goal, don't adjust in the wrong direction, and persist stubbornly, you will try again and draw water with a sieve, and eventually get farther and farther away from the goal. In order to realize the enterprise mission, we Baijiang did not stick to the once brilliant bottled business and business model, but adjusted our direction in time, entered the pipe network business, changed the bottled gas retail business model and enhanced our competitiveness. This is the spiritual embodiment of our Baijiang taking this as the ultimate goal, seeking truth from facts and seeking change pragmatically. What Baijiang needs today is the spirit of pragmatic change, not arrogance. The history of our Baijiang River is actually a realistic, fickle and innovative history.

Now, winning or losing is not important. We know very well that our purpose is simple: to get together and have a collision of ideas to discuss the great project of * * *. As Mr. Nathan Chen said: "The cause initiated by Baijiang is unprecedented. Our enterprises are all over the country and our business is full of vitality. " Isn't it the embodiment of Baijiang people's pragmatic, fickle and innovative spirit?

As the saying goes, if you are poor, you will change, and if you change, you will be too long. Only by seeking change in pragmatism and making progress in innovation can we break the old and establish new ones, break the routine and win opportunities for development and growth. Let's create brilliance under the guidance of Baijiang culture!

Four arguments: Our first, second and third arguments prove that Gong Yu is moving mountains. I would like to make some supplements from the following aspects: Mao Zedong mentioned in a speech 6 1 years ago that we should learn from Gong Yu if we want to remove the "three mountains" above our heads. This is an example. In addition, in this story, God was moved and moved two mountains, which also proved that Gong Yu was moving mountains. Our three arguments also prove that Gong Yu is moving mountains with the dustpan and hoe used by Gong Yu's family in the story. Other debaters have been guiding us to turn the debate in other directions. This is a way to steal the beam and replace the column. Although you are eloquent, in fact, black is black, white is white, and black and white cannot be reversed. In fact, these are not the most important. The most important thing is that the transfer of the opposing defense friend is simply an irresponsible escape. We can't advocate it, especially our professional managers in Baijiang, and we can't hold this attitude.

Today, at this time, we borrow the treasure land of Beijing and the Monument to the People's Heroes in Tiananmen Square.