Hello, I think higher education should combine leniency with severity, which is more conducive to personal development. The competition in modern society is fierce, and more and more people are eager to improve their competitiveness by receiving higher education. On the one hand, lenient entrance and strict exit can recruit students through multiple channels, so that more students have the opportunity to receive higher education, which can reduce the academic burden of students, promote quality education in middle schools, be more conducive to the development of students' personality, and give them more choices and more room for development. Long Yongtu, a famous diplomat in China, said that our university enrollment can be diversified, and our students should be able to submit resumes to university professors like foreign students, show their special talents to professors, get recognition from professors, and get opportunities for higher education. On the other hand, schools can formulate a strict assessment system, elimination system and other diversified selection systems, which can be better.

First, screening talents and giving students enough motivation will help spur and motivate students to study hard and improve their comprehensive quality. We say that universities are places for cultivating talents and for students to transition into society. College students will face great employment pressure after graduation, and these four years are a good buffer preparation stage for them. The strict standards of the school are undoubtedly responsible for students, which will help students to better adapt to society, develop better in society and contribute to social development after graduation.

Second, lenient entry and strict exit are the objective needs of social development and can better promote social development. With the establishment and development of the socialist market economic system, the society needs a large number of outstanding high-quality talents. University is not a printing machine for diplomas, but a fertile ground for cultivating talents. If the school enrolls students strictly and does not strictly control the delivery of talents to the society, it will easily lead to social doubts.

Page 3

For example, it is difficult for graduates to find jobs, and the company can't find high-quality talents that meet the requirements. On the one hand, it can ensure the quantity and quality of talents to the society, which is the responsibility of the school to the society and the objective demand of social development. On the other hand, it can also improve the popularity of higher education and improve the overall quality of the people. It has improved the educational and cultural level of the whole society, provided sufficient impetus for the development of China, helped China to change from a "big country with human resources" to a "powerful country with human resources", and made China invincible in the increasingly fierce international competition.

To sum up, I think higher education in China should combine leniency with severity. thank you

The slogan is high and accessible to the public;

Education is the foundation of a strong country;

Broad-minded, recruiting wise men;

Strict, casting talents!

1. What does the other party think of the fact that the diploma has depreciated at an alarming rate?

This is mainly due to the generosity of universities, which makes it easy for college students to get diplomas, leading to the proliferation of diplomas, uneven quality of college graduates and reduced gold content of diplomas.

2. Many employers can't recruit people, and many college graduates can't find jobs. How to treat this phenomenon?

On the one hand, the school is not strict in sending talents to the society, and it has low requirements for students' knowledge and skills; On the other hand, students are not motivated enough to study at school and do not study well.

Use four years of college to improve their competitiveness.

3. Does the multi-channel and diversified selection model broaden the enrollment door of the school and recruit more talents?

Multi-channel and diversified selection mode is the embodiment of generosity, which is more reasonable and scientific than the single selection mode in the past.

4. Strict admission and leniency restrict the implementation of quality education. Does this violate the national policy of promoting quality education?

Primary and secondary schools are the best time for students to cultivate their hobbies and personality development. Yan Jinkuan let students concentrate on the selection examination, and the school is also carrying out examination-oriented education, which is not conducive to the implementation of quality education.

5. In the Outline of Education Planning issued by the State Council, it is pointed out that improving quality is the core task of the development of higher education and the basic requirement of building a powerful country in higher education. Does this mean that higher education in China should be strict? The opposing debater may not understand the requirements set forth in the outline. The outline requires us to be strict in cultivating talents and delivering talents to the society, and to strictly control the source of students rather than enrollment to improve the quality of students.

6. In the Action Plan for Revitalizing Education Facing 2 1 Century, the State Council clearly put forward the requirement of "vigorously developing higher education". Does this mean that higher education in China should be broadened?

The current enrollment expansion of colleges and universities proves that leniency conforms to China's educational policy (formulated according to the national conditions) and is more conducive to the popularization of higher education.