Let me answer your question: "The scope of layoffs has expanded. What is the real reason behind this layoff and what impact will it bring? " I want to say I want to say actually, it's very simple. Why have so many large factories concentrated on layoffs recently? The reason is only four words-borrowing a donkey to go downhill. A closer look shows that the recent layoffs of large factories were collectively "destroyed" by a group, a department and a department. Which industries are most likely to be eliminated? These are innovation departments, marginal departments. Since there are layoffs, why did you set up these departments to carry out these businesses in the first place? ?

First of all, it's simple-trial and error. The business of a big factory enters the deep water area, just like a big ship sailing in the dark sea, and no one knows where the next direction is. Then the best way is to send a boat to try all possible directions. But exploring new directions is itself a highly uncertain thing. Send 100 ships, maybe 90 ships are doomed to hit the rocks and sink. But I can't stand this number. No matter how small the probability is, as long as there is success, we will find this direction and expand the company's capability boundary little by little. ?

Secondly, no one is born to know what to do, and everyone is constantly trying to find the best solution through trial and error. Everyone will overestimate themselves, everyone will be biased, the market will speak with facts, and consumers will vote with banknotes. But overall, for the company, I just need to know which one is successful. Many large factories have similar mechanisms. For example, in the goose factory, it is called "horse racing". But the question is, what about the failed teams? What about the ships that proved to be on the rocks?

Third, the most reasonable way is to dissolve on the spot. People are reconfigured and resources are recombined, and the market will automatically correct its mistakes. People no longer waste their time on useless things, but seek and adjust their position again through the job market. But the above is just an ideal assumption. Actually, it's none of your business and it's none of your business. Those failed teams haven't left yet. The layoffs of large factories should be compensated in kind and bear the cost of public opinion. ?

Finally, during the boom, big factories have money and resources anyway, so it doesn't hurt to raise more people. As long as you have worked in a big factory in recent years, you will have a personal experience. In the past few years, not all major factories have been overcrowded. The office is obviously used up, the elevator is getting harder and harder, and the queue in the canteen is getting longer and longer. The activity area is gone, the teahouse is cancelled, and the conference room is crowded with people. ?