The message is this:
1. There are many arguments that cicada's theorem is not valid -2
These two students, I have no malice towards you, but I hope you will always gain something from your own efforts; If you think I'm making fun of you maliciously, in the words of Fan Xiao, be my guest.
I have been studying hard to think for so many years, which is nothing to brag about, because it is just my own hobby, just like many people like playing mahjong; But this is not something worth hiding, or embarrassing, which requires false modesty, because this is something I wanted to do since I was a child, but I never felt good about myself. The more books I read, the more I know that many things are beyond my vision, even beyond my imagination, so I have a good foundation for the study of entanglement theory. First, I have read so many books, at least I seldom meet more than me in reality. This is me. Second, I don't consider myself an onion or a tack. I am ordinary, so I know there are real people in this world. When you meet a person, or a book, you should first let go of yourself, your prejudice, your point of view, calm down and find out what others are saying, and then see if it is meaningful and worth continuing. What matters is what you can learn, not finding fault with others. If you always find fault first, what good will it do you to look like an ox? I think this is a waste of my time. You can't learn all the beautiful things in this world, but you can't see them. Isn't it difficult to turn over the garbage yourself? Of course, there are some benefits, which can greatly satisfy your young vanity. Xiao Juan left a message today. Basically, she doesn't read other people's books now, which is a waste of time. That is, she has this qualification, provided that she is well-read, hard-working, talented, can read through the back of the paper, and can get through the past and the present. How many of these can be achieved and occupied? Ordinary people, like us, meet awesome people and learn with an open mind. What else can we say? Never mind Xiao Yan, it has millions of hits. There are still some people better than you. Others can read Xiao Yan's good. You are great. Can you say that Xiao Yan can't pass? I'm not saying that many clicks are good, such as that seven seven seven, such as Sister Xu's blog, but who can write all these series written by Xiao Juan? When Xiao Juan first clicked over 2 million, he didn't start talking about stocks. Moreover, the stock market is very easy to judge, and the theory can be tested immediately. For example, many people analyze the trend of the market now, and there is a look. Is this fake, too? For example, people like me who like to show off, map analysis everywhere. No matter how much I show off, this analysis and this diagram are strictly based on the theory of small entanglement. For example, someone asks about western materials. I said that I hadn't bought this stock before that weekend, and I didn't know what its fundamentals were, let alone whether it was right or wrong. I just analyzed according to my current learning level, which verified Xiao Yan's theory, not how I am. Only one person is qualified to verify me, and that is whether I am a qualified whaler. Before that, these are all pediatrics now.
The earliest news in the Analects of Confucius series is called "Crazy Song", which is a negative example. He wrote a series called Crazy Criticism of the Analects of Confucius, but in fact he didn't look carefully at what Xiao Juan was saying and what he was thinking. Every time I pick out a few words from a small tangle and make a lot of phone calls according to my own understanding, which has become a joke for many people. He has read some books, and his logic and understanding ability should not be a problem, but what oil blinded his eyes and his heart? That's prejudice, prejudice, your own so-called opinion. In my opinion, he made many so-called scholar's mistakes. He reads more books than others, and he thinks he is the best in the world. In fact, he reads a lot of books and is most prone to prejudice. Especially at a certain age, he closed himself up, no longer absorbed new nutrition, and was still studying, but he only read what he wanted to see from books and only agreed with what he wanted to agree with. There is a standard in my heart. What conforms to me is right, and what does not conform to me is wrong, even outrageous, even illegal, although it is his own law.
When I don't understand, I first think I am wrong. If I think hard and understand her thinking, I will have my own ideas. For example, I relaxed the definition the day before yesterday and advanced 107, which is ok, because when I first defined the pen, I didn't say whether there was a K line in the middle. I'm just saying it's better to have this K line. But next time I encounter the same situation, I will still do it my way. Another example is lesson 54. Many people say that Lian Bi is not there, so how can it be a line segment? However, there is no definition and classification of pen in Lesson 54. The focus of this lesson is how to decompose trends. If you just picked the wrong place, you just picked the wrong place. Unlike some students who read it for a month and say that many theorems are unreasonable. Classic and historical subset, Chinese and western ideological and cultural philosophy, how many books have you read? What's your degree in physics and mathematics? How many articles have you read about the Analects of Confucius, Marx, economics, poetry and songs, and Zen essays? What do you think of the stock market? Can you make money fearlessly in the stock market? If not, please don't say no to small entanglements.
It is not that you must have the above to learn entanglement theory well, nor that you can learn it well with these. A literate person may not become a Buddha, but the illiterate six ancestors can realize the Tao. Literacy is good for some people, but it becomes an obstacle for some people. Everyone's situation is different, and it can't be changed immediately. It doesn't really matter. It is even more unnecessary to take enlightenment and Dafa Robbie. The only thing that people can be sure of is that they will die sooner or later, but since they are alive, they should try to do something. First of all, they should be clear and accept their present situation, and don't compare with others. Second, when they start learning, let go of your small ego, their prejudice and their subjectivity. As many advertisements boast, wearing a pair of shoes will make you, drinking sweet water will surpass you, and wearing a pair of pants will make you have personality. Is this self worth keeping?
This doesn't mean that you should put aside your prejudices and blindly follow them, so you can't learn well either. This means that you must let go of your prejudices and ideas. When your mind is open, you must think, understand and think harder. What is thinking? That is, you should always ask questions: what do you want to say here, what is the key point, why do you say this, why do you say it so inconsistently, and what is the purpose of saying this? As long as you persist, sooner or later you will be completely bound. You don't have to be a whaler. There are many things worth doing in this world, but if you are free in money, you can do what you like.
And this is something worth doing for a lifetime.
Attachment: A new interpretation of the tangled Zen in the latest Analects of Confucius
It is precisely because of this that it is necessary to cultivate self-cultivation and self-sufficiency in everything, and it is not necessary to seek any external divine power. Because all external forces can't replace you, your growth can only be your growth, your virtue can only be your virtue, and no god can replace it. Confucius never believed in those boring lies, and he could live forever after being saved by the so-called God. Confucius only believed in his own strength, and everything was born by everyone's own strength. This is also ancient China.
The traditional logic of "self-improvement" Ps: If you really want to learn entanglement theory, you should be prepared for a protracted war.
First, you won't be eager for quick success. Only by putting a correct attitude can we avoid eating too much and chewing too fast, and haste makes waste.
Second, I will not give up easily, dare to say that the binding theory is unreasonable and dare to say that the binding theory is deceptive. They are all awesome people, ordinary as you and me, learning step by step, even if they die. Constant thinking is your greatest gain, at least better than spending all this time playing cards and bragging.