Some people say that Song Wu killed the tiger as a hero and harmed others and himself.
Some people say that Song Wu's killing tigers is not a hero because he doesn't care about wild animals.
Which view is correct?
This question has to be decided according to the times.
According to relevant data, if it was in the era of water margin, that is, the Ming Dynasty, then Song Wu was a real hero, a real hero! Because the tiger killed by Song Wu is an evil tiger, a tiger that hurts people. In the Ming dynasty, tigers were not in short supply, and most of them would hurt people and livestock, so tigers were not precious at that time. Song Wu killed the fierce tiger just to save the people from harm, so that the people in Jingyanggang would no longer be harassed by evil tigers and let the people there live a more comfortable and safe life.
It's different now. It is illegal to shoot tigers. Besides, Song Wu killed the tiger. There are not many tigers now, but many of them are farmed artificially, and wild tigers are very rare. Because of this, tigers are becoming more and more precious, especially wild tigers.
Some countries also list tigers as national first-,second-and third-class protected animals. If Song Wu kills a tiger now, that is to say, an animal protected by the state, then he just doesn't care about wild animals, and not only will his conscience be condemned, but the national wildlife protection law will not let him go.
So Song Wu was a hero in the Ming Dynasty, but now he is not.
Song Wu's killing tigers is just a story written by Shi Naian. Not really fighting tigers. We should learn from Song Wu's fearless spirit. Not everyone is going to kill tigers. If anyone is found to hurt wild animals in real life, we should take immediate action to protect the rights and interests of animals.