1. Strengthen training and summarize in time.

(1) white paper combing-breaking subjective questions

Take out a blank sheet of paper and a pen, and sort out the knowledge points of subjective questions without looking at any information. This is also the process of communicating with yourself. After summing up, you will find that there are still many things you haven't remembered. This is a very effective method. Combing these problems, we can find many weak links.

(2) Mind mapping-combing the knowledge framework

If you feel that your thoughts are always in a mess, you can't sort them out at all. In fact, there is a way to help you clear your mind better-mind map. Harry, an American graph theory scholar, famously said, "A thousand words are not worth a picture", which is the reason. Whether it is subject 1 or subject 2, using maps will make the knowledge we want to review very clear and organized.

(3) pay attention to the wrong questions-check for leaks.

We must pay enough attention to the wrong questions. I suggest you summarize the wrong questions at least 1-2 times a week, and then sort out the knowledge points in the chapter where the wrong questions are located. The more feasible way is to strengthen the training of 10-20 similar questions to see their correct rate.

2. Pay attention to problem-solving norms and straighten out the thinking of doing problems.

(1) Pay attention to the pen tip

Think carefully, why are papers always smeared? There is a simple reason. When thinking is not focused on the nib, it is natural for the nib to make mistakes. Therefore, a good problem-solving standard first lies in thinking about what the pen tip wants to write, so it won't be wrong.

(2) Think before writing

When practicing subjective questions, such as material analysis questions and composition, you must think clearly before writing. Anyone who can get high marks in the exam rarely sees a lot of graffiti, unclear thinking and confusing expression. I suggest that from now on, every big problem should be written in strict accordance with the standard problem-solving norms, so as to cultivate good problem-solving norms.

3. Make a plan in advance and strictly follow the plan.

It is suggested that the review process be divided into three stages:

The first two weeks are used to sort out the knowledge learned and strengthen the memory of subjective questions;

In the third week, focus on learning high-frequency test sites, and deepen your memory again in combination with topic exercises;

In the fourth week, check for leaks and fill gaps, and do at least two sets of simulation questions to enhance the sense of the questions.

Adjust your preparation mentality one day before the exam, so that you can play freely in the examination room.