The propositional view is wrong. (1 point)

(1) Strengthening ideological and moral cultivation can promote intellectual and cultural cultivation. If we do not pay attention to ideological and moral cultivation, even if we have a wealth of knowledge, it will be difficult to avoid personality defects and even endanger society. "Morality can often make up for the shortcomings of wisdom, but wisdom can never make up for the shortcomings of morality." is correct. (3 points)

(2) Good knowledge and cultural accomplishment help people consciously establish correct ideas, enhance their ability to distinguish right from wrong, and develop good behavioral habits; good knowledge and cultural accomplishment, It is the intellectual foundation for making more contributions to society. The view that "ideological and moral cultivation is more important than intellectual and cultural cultivation" is wrong. (3 points)

(3) Therefore, a person who is beneficial to the people should not only have good knowledge and cultural connotation, but also constantly improve his ideological and moral cultivation. (1 point)

Test question analysis: This question is an analysis question. Examine the relationship between ideological and moral cultivation and intellectual and cultural cultivation. The two are in a mutually reinforcing relationship, and one cannot be said to be more important than the other. Based on this, it is judged that the propositional view is wrong. Let’s talk about the relationship between the two. Strengthening ideological and moral cultivation can promote intellectual and cultural cultivation. Good knowledge and cultural accomplishment are conducive to the cultivation of ideological and moral cultivation. Finally draw a conclusion. It is necessary not only to have good intellectual and cultural connotations, but also to continuously improve ideological and moral cultivation.

Comments: The idea of ????solving the problem of identification and analysis: the basic principle is the "three steps", that is, the first "identification", the second "analysis", and the third "conclusion".

One "discrimination". "Discrimination" means to carefully examine the questions, clarify the question types and "discrimination points", and distinguish right from wrong. Make a simple, clear, and accurate judgment on the "identification point" and briefly explain the reasons. You cannot just make a simple distinction between right and wrong.

Two "Analysis". The analysis must be comprehensive, accurate, closely related to the topic, and logical, and avoid theory being divorced from reality. For arguments that are completely correct or completely wrong, judge and analyze them; for arguments that have both reasonable and unreasonable components, or are established under certain conditions, or are incompletely expressed, point out the reasonable components, analyze and evaluate them, and point out unreasonable components and analyze, supplement and evaluate them.

Three "knots". Draw conclusions on the basis of identification and analysis. The conclusions should be logical and qualitative about the solutions proposed or the statements in the questions.