To solve this problem, we must first make clear the meaning of the problem. Diligence and clumsiness are relative, not absolute. Take a hypothetical goal as the end point. The ability required to achieve this goal is a fixed value, and both cleverness and diligence are necessary conditions (if this condition is denied, the topic will be denied). It can be inferred that if 40% diligence +40% talent +20% other influence = the ability needed to achieve the goal. Therefore, diligence can make up for it.

1, the percentage here is not for people, but the proportion of the value needed to achieve this goal.

2. The ability value required to achieve the goal is a fixed value, only for the goal to be achieved. For a simple example, if your maximum diligence value is 70, other influence values are 50, and the target value to be achieved is 200, then you must also have a daily score of 80.

3. Diligence can make up for it, and the complementarity of diligence and clumsiness is that the sum of the two exceeds the ability needed to achieve the goal. On the premise of achieving the same value, the reduction of talent will inevitably increase the proportion of diligence. Similarly, under the premise of constant talent, the increase of diligence will increase the final total value.

4. Diligence and cleverness are both necessary conditions to achieve the goal, that is to say, no value can exceed the ability value needed to achieve the goal.