Please ask for help in the debate. I am the pro-argument. Doing good deeds should be known by others. The con-side is that doing good deeds should not be known by others.

1. Let us clarify what self-esteem is. Self-esteem means respecting oneself and maintaining one's personal dignity. , a psychological state that does not allow others to insult and discriminate. Doing good deeds is originally out of respect and love, but the opponent's friend actually thinks that doing good deeds that are known to others is a trampling on self-esteem. First, he has an extreme understanding of self-esteem, and second, he deliberately accuses us of hurting others' self-esteem.

2. The greater the reputation, the greater the attention, and the easier it is to be discovered and punished if you do bad things. The eyes of the masses are sharp, and the punishment of the police is severe. The opposing debater's behavior is purely due to eating waste and is unreasonable.

3. Good deeds are real good deeds. This is irrefutable. While it does help others, it also brings certain benefits to oneself, that is, the benefits that the other debater considers. I would like to ask, are interests and good deeds inconsistent with each other? The police also offered a reward to catch the thief. From the other party's point of view, this is not all hypocrisy, so why do the police still help the thief? My fellow debater, you can't be too bright. We are debating, but we are arguing for the truth, not just for victory or defeat. You keep asking people who do good deeds to keep their names anonymous and downplay the benefits, but you and I are chattering endlessly for the sake of winning a debate. Are we qualified to criticize your so-called hypocrisy for gaining benefits?

Questions,

1. Do good deeds without leaving a name. Do you know Lei Feng? Why do you know Lei Feng? Is it Lei Feng’s Diary? Or is it the party’s vigorous propaganda? Lei Feng did good deeds without leaving a name. You only emphasized "without leaving a name" rather than "doing good deeds", and "doing good deeds" is the focus of the party's propaganda. Furthermore, Lei Feng is a good role model for the people. If you don’t even know who your role model is, how can you be a role model? How come the role of role models takes the lead?

2. Is there any difference between a rich man's child who disappeared and a reward of 10 million was offered to find him and a criminal who kidnapped a rich man's child and extorted 10 million? What is the difference? One is seeking profit to induce people to do good, and the other is seeking profit to do evil. Why can't doing good for the sake of profit be called good? The facts are in front of you, why haven't you recognized the other party yet?

The workers built skyscrapers and got paid, and the law enforcement officers got paid for upholding justice. They are good and do not do bad things because of the involvement of money! It is human nature to seek profit. If profit can drive people to do good, why not?

(The other party’s point about leaving one’s name is nothing more than profit, which can be refuted completely, because interest is not inconsistent with doing good deeds. Secondly, the positive social effects that leaving one’s name can bring cannot be achieved without leaving one’s name. We can also use it as an advantage)

Finally, I wish you a happy debate! I am the right side of the debate. To do good deeds, people must know my views. To do good deeds against the other side, don’t let others know and ask for help.

This thing of pure value must be deduced slowly, step by step.

Some people hope to do good deeds. Receiving response A), some people do good deeds and don’t care about the response (B), some people feel satisfied when being helped (C), and some people don’t want third parties to know about being helped (D) because they are afraid of hurting their self-esteem. If C meets A or B, it's both NICE. If D meets B, it seems that the two people have a good understanding. Only if D meets A, there will be a conflict. At this time, letting people know is hurting the person being helped, but it is not Letting people know about it hurts the person helping others. Comparing the two, you will find that today I have kindly helped others, but I am still wronged. Isn't it very inhumane? Then I start to explain the value.

When there is a contradiction in the second question, there is no better, or there is a missing comparison

The third question can be treated reductively, because the other party’s statement is a slippery slope fallacy. Push possibility into necessity.

Urgently looking for information that proves that money is the foundation of doing good in the debate!!!

1. Goodness includes a heart of kindness and compassion, but also has the ability to save people and do good. We cannot just sit in the hands of the weak. Sing hymns in front of you to express sympathy.

2. Economy is the foundation of modern society. As one of the social activities, doing good deeds is naturally inseparable from money.

3. Money plays an important role in modern society. Expressed as currency or currency symbols, it is a medium for material exchange. A society without money is a primitive society, a barter exchange, self-production and self-consumption, and a self-sufficient backward society. You can only grow vegetables, grain, and cotton. To spin yarn and make clothes, you can only travel on foot. To eat a mouthful of salt, you need to go to the Yellow Sea, and to eat a mouthful of meat, you need to feed a pig. If you are too busy to survive, how can you do good deeds? You are lucky if no one does good deeds for you.

4. Money is an important part of personal wealth and social wealth, and an important indicator of personal ability and national economic level. If you don’t do good things if you have money, it’s because you are rich and unkind. If you don’t have money, you can’t do good things because of you. Incompetent.

5. It is hard to imagine that if a person lacks money and necessary survival materials, how can he do good deeds? If we say that doing things personally and helping others on a daily basis is a small act of kindness, then spending a lot of money and giving charity is a deed. Great good. To do good to one person is to do small good. To do good to everyone is to do great good. To do good to a whole place is to do small good. To do good to a country is to do great good. To save the world from poverty is to do small good. To save the progress of human society is Do good deeds. If you have money, it’s easier to do things. If you don’t have money, if you want to do good deeds, just stand on the crossroads and help the old lady cross the street. Maybe the old lady doesn’t want you to help her, because she hires a nanny.

6. Money is good for doing good. A strong guarantee, the amount of financial contribution is an important criterion for judging the level of charity.

The 2007 Hurun Charity List revealed that 85-year-old Yu Pengnian generously donated 2 billion. What is this concept? 20 mainland counties, one Year's fiscal net income.

Mr. Li Ka-shing, the richest Chinese man in the world, announced on August 24 that he will donate one-third of his personal wealth to the Li Ka-shing Foundation in the future to fully develop philanthropy. Prior to this, Mr. Li’s charitable donations in Mainland China and Hong Kong had totaled HK$8 billion. According to Forbes' 2006 list of the world's richest people, Mr. Li's personal wealth is approximately HK$150 billion. Donating one-third would be equivalent to donating HK$50 billion.

Carnegie, the father of American philanthropy, donated nearly 3,000 libraries before his death in 1919. Together with other charitable donation projects, his total donation reached 3.3 More than 100 million US dollars. The famous saying "It is shameful to die rich, and pitiful to die poor"

In 2003, two news related to the charity run by the rich were widely circulated around the world. First, Bill Gates, the world's richest man, has decided to step away from the day-to-day management of Microsoft in the next two years and prepare to devote his main energy to health and education philanthropy; second, the American "stock god" Buffett has decided to donate US$37 billion to charitable foundations. About $30 billion of that amount was donated to the Gates Foundation.

In 2006, Microsoft recently announced that since 1983, Microsoft and its employees have donated free cash, services and software products to non-profit organizations around the world through corporate donations and personal volunteer activities. The value has exceeded US$2.5 billion.

In 2006, in addition to the unabated momentum of corporate charitable foundations in donations, the corporate itself also continued to be popular in public welfare undertakings. On June 5, the American Committee to Encourage Corporate Philanthropy (hereinafter referred to as the Committee) announced that American companies' philanthropic efforts remained strong in 2006. Charitable donations by American companies increased by an average of 4.7% in 2006. Debate competition: Be kind to strangers, and ignore strangers on the opposite side. I am a debater for the affirmative, and I need to know how to argue in a debate competition

It can be done morally, such as whether to help an old lady when she falls. The problem is, she is a stranger but we have to pay attention to her, right?

The relationship between people comes from the first impression. If you don't treat others well the first time, your interpersonal relationship will not exist... There is a debate competition. The positive side is "people are great" and the negative side is "people are small." "I am the affirmative, how can I argue?

If from the perspective of the affirmative, we should mainly discuss the series of achievements that humans have made since the emergence of the present (which are the various manifestations of our beautiful life now); if from the negative perspective, We should mainly talk about how few achievements humans have made compared with the universe, nature, etc. For example, humans are still powerless against viruses, etc., etc.!

Debate Contest: Doing good deeds should be known to others or should doing good deeds not be known to others

Many people who do good deeds do not do it for fame! But the world doesn’t know that doing good is the most effective and fastest way to become famous! So people who become famous for doing good are not hypocrites! They do good and not evil! Do good without expecting anything in return! Do good without leaving a name! Is this hypocrisy?

Some people have done wrong things in the past and later sincerely repented! Do good everywhere! This is also true and good!

Hypocritical people do evil things! His heart is not true and kind!

The definition of hypocrisy is to see whether the heart is true and good. If the heart is not good, it is hypocrisy, and if the heart is true and good, it is true and good! It doesn’t matter whether you are famous or not! In a debate, I am the affirmative, how do I reject the negative?

My opponent, you want to argue that opening a book is useless, so the proposition you need to demonstrate is as follows: There is no benefit in reading any book. Therefore, the opponent's opponent's burden of proof is not fully borne. According to the rules of debate, the burden is directly imposed. Do you want to participate in the cram school debate competition? (I am the affirmative) and let the opposing side have a fatal question

Guan Yu in "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is brave and good at fighting, with both wisdom and courage. He "passed five levels and killed six generals", "went to the meeting alone", " "The water flooded seven armies", he had the unstoppable courage of ten thousand men, but as a result he "lost Jingzhou" and "defeated Maicheng". Why did Guan Yu fail? Because he failed to overcome a fatal flaw - pride and complacency.

In order to achieve success, American scientist Franklin first reviewed his own shortcomings. He found that he had 13 serious shortcomings, three of which were: wasting time, worrying about small things, and arguing and conflicting with others. . The wise Franklin discovered that unless he could correct these shortcomings, nothing would be accomplished. So he decided to correct one shortcoming every week. He designed a form and conducted self-examination every day. This continued for two years. He corrected all the shortcomings. He finally became the most beloved and influential person in American history. One of the powerful people. Why was Franklin successful? Because he overcame all his shortcomings.

Regarding talent, someone once asked people this question: "Do you think the key to success is to use your talents and develop your strengths, or to overcome your shortcomings and make up for them?" Interestingly, whether it is the Chinese or the American People, British, French, Japanese or Canadians; whether young or old, rich or poorly educated, the answer is almost the same: overcome shortcomings and make up for shortcomings. Particularly in the field of education and in the home, a traditional focus on weaknesses and flaws is deeply ingrained. Someone once surveyed many parents like this: If your child comes home with a report card like this: 95 points in Chinese, 80 points in English, and 32 points in mathematics, which subject are you most concerned about? The result is that 81% of parents choose mathematics and only 7% choose Chinese. Why? Because math scores are the worst, and it is a major subject. If a child cannot learn it well, he or she will not be able to go to college.

Debate: You said that "learning should first develop your strengths and then make up for your weaknesses." Let me use an analogy. For example, my English is my strength. I am immersed in English all day long. I work hard. Di Yangchang, I will make up for math when my English is about to reach full marks. As we all know, math cannot be picked up in a week, two weeks, a month or two. Don’t you think it is too late to make up for math at this time?

Positive arguments:

1. Everyone has few strengths and many shortcomings. The shortcomings are what I am not good at. If I have to make up for every shortcoming, I will make up for it over and over again. Short or short. But what if I show my strengths first? Then I will stand out.

Rely on my strengths to succeed

Debate: You have finally admitted the fact that it is your shortcomings because you are not good at it. We need to face up to our shortcomings and not let them become the shortcomings that hinder our success. We must have the courage to admit shortcomings and shortcomings, and actively find the right way to solve them. Why did Guan Yu, who was brave, good at fighting, wise and courageous, "defeat Maicheng"?

2. Every success is one percent wisdom and ninety-nine percent sweat. As long as you work hard, you will succeed. How can it be too late?

3. The "bamboo pole effect" originated from the observation of fruit farmers when harvesting fruits. Fruit farmers often use bamboo poles to harvest fruits from large trees. Only the longest bamboo pole can harvest the most.

4. Even if Zhuge Liang is forced to practice martial arts every day, I am afraid he will only be able to lift Guan Yun's boots. Zhuge Liang has a very good mind, and you cannot let him use a big sword. So we have to argue: Zhuge Liang is indeed the most intelligent in the world, but what is Zhuge Liang's weakness - he is weak. Everyone knows that Zhuge Liang died of illness in Wuzhangyuan. Why did he die of illness? Because he did not have a strong body, if he had made up for his shortcomings, would he have fallen ill from overwork during the Sixth Northern Expedition and died of illness in Wuzhangyuan because he did not have the strong body of a general? Therefore, in everything we do, we should make up for our shortcomings first. Even Confucius said, "When three people walk together, there must be someone who is my teacher." Learning the strengths of others to make up for your own shortcomings is the most urgent task!

Edison couldn’t become Leonardo da Vinci even if he painted eggs every day. So we have to promote ourselves. Although successful people have different paths to success, there are certain rules, which is to promote their strengths.

Argument:

1. You have finally admitted the fact that it is your shortcomings because you are not good at it. We need to face up to our shortcomings and not let them become the shortcomings that hinder our success. We must have the courage to admit our shortcomings and shortcomings and actively seek the right method to solve them. When an enemy country invades, shouldn't the invaded country strengthen the weaker parts of the city wall?

2. The "bamboo pole effect" mentioned by the other classmate is the observation of fruit farmers harvesting fruits. Fruits are the final results. As far as current study is concerned, if you only get a red light in one subject, do you think the final fruits of your study will be huge? Everyone knows the "barrel theory, short board effect". If you do poorly in one subject, no matter how well you do in other subjects, it will affect your overall grade.

3. The other classmate has made it clear that everyone has few strengths and many shortcomings. Yes, let me give you an example. If the other classmate is poor in five of the six subjects, you will be very weak in one subject. Excellent, at that time will you continue to develop the subject in which you are excellent and temporarily put down your weak subjects? Do you think it is still too late to make up for your shortcomings after you have developed your strengths?

4. It is indeed important to enhance strengths, but it is more important to make up for weaknesses. Everyone knows the short board theory. The wooden barrel holding water is made of many wooden boards, and the water capacity is also determined by these wooden boards. same decision. If one of the wooden boards is very short, the water capacity of the barrel will be limited by the short board. This short board becomes the "limiting factor" for the water capacity of the barrel.

Some people say: The part higher than the lowest board is meaningless. The higher it is, the greater the waste. If you want to increase the capacity of the barrel, you should try to increase the height of the shortest board. This is the most effective and only way. The short board theory is what we often call the main contradiction. Only by understanding the weak links of affairs, grasping the crux of the problem, and grasping the main contradiction of the problem can we grasp the key to solving the problem and achieve maximum success.

Positive Question 1

If you don’t develop your strengths first, will your strengths become short in the end?

Debate does not mean that we must have strong points. On the stage of home appliances, hundreds of schools of thought are vying for supremacy, but Haier is at the forefront step by step. Why? Haier's capital is not thicker than others, and it has not introduced more international talents than others, and the quality of its talents is not higher than others... In a word, Haier does not have many "high wooden boards", but it has a good team, and its overall performance is not as good as others. Any "high plank" is bad.

Counter-question 1

We all agree that "learning should first make up for your shortcomings and then develop your strengths." I would like to ask the other student, when you go to a cram school to make up lessons, you usually focus on your strengths. Or work on your weaknesses? Please answer.

Regarding the main contradiction that plays a decisive role, focus on the key points

Positive: The focus in learning is to develop strengths

Negative: The focus in learning is to solve weaknesses

Refutation: The other student said that carrying forward strengths is the main contradiction. You must know that if the secondary contradictions are not resolved well, it will also affect the main contradiction. For example, if you are good at math and get full marks in the exam, but you fail in other subjects, do you think your overall score will be higher?

True: We study to gain a skill so that we can have a foothold in society in the future, not to get a good score

Refutation: In terms of learning to increase confidence, if you If you blindly promote your strengths, when you see the disastrous scores in your weak subjects, you will feel unconfident and even a little anxious, which is very detrimental to our study. But if we make up for our shortcomings first and watch ourselves making progress step by step, this will be very helpful to enhance our self-confidence and will also be of great help to our learning. As for the degree of growth, people always have a limit. When your strengths have reached a certain level, no matter how hard you try to enhance your strengths, you will not be able to grow any more. On the contrary, if we make up for our shortcomings, there is indeed a very large room for improvement. This is also very beneficial to our own strength!

Positive: We insist that "study should first develop your strengths and then make up for your weaknesses." For example, when you were taking an exam, you encountered a difficult problem in front of you, and you kept studying it in depth and wasted a lot of time. It is wrong to not have time to do the questions that you will do later. We should first do what we are good at and what we know how to do, and then go back and solve what we can't do in the end. That is to say, exploit strengths first and then make up for weaknesses.

Debate: What the other student said was a misunderstanding! When taking exams, it does not mean that you should first pick out what you can do, and then go back and solve the things you can't do after finishing it. This is a wrong understanding. The fact is, it’s not that you can solve it immediately after you finish what you’re good at and then go back and do it again, but that you simply don’t know how to solve it. It’s your weakness and you don’t have the ability or method to solve it now. it. The fundamental solution is not to skip it and then go back to solve it, but to learn thoroughly what you don't know and what you are weakest about first, that is, make up for your shortcomings and then use your strengths, so that you can do whatever you don't know how to do and what you are not good at. , so what’s the difficulty in what you can do and be good at? In the debate, the positive side is weak and the negative side is strong

It is indeed a common phenomenon that people are poor and have short ambitions. The poor spend most of their energy on meeting material needs and have no time to take into account higher spiritual needs. They have no more opportunities to improve their spiritual realm, which in turn leads to poverty and short ambition. In comparison, it is commendable that people who are poor but ambitious are not short-lived. Because they are in the minority, things are more valuable when they are scarce. Some poor people have access to more outside information...