This sentence does imply the contradiction and complexity of politicians' influence on the war. War is not only courage and sacrifice, but also a struggle between politics and power. Politicians make decisions, while young people are sent to the battlefield, facing the risk of life and physical disability.

However, this does not mean that politicians' games are meaningless. Political decision-making may bring war, but it may also bring peace and stability. Political decision-making may have a far-reaching impact on a country or a region, even affecting generations.

At the same time, we can't ignore the choice and motivation of young people who volunteered to participate in the war. Although their decisions may be influenced by political and power factors, they also have their own reasons and beliefs. Their sacrifice may be due to patriotism, sense of responsibility, moral belief or other personal reasons.

So this sentence needs to be interpreted in a broader context. War is a complex phenomenon, involving politics, history, culture, morality and personal choice. We can't simply attribute the war to a politician's game, nor can we ignore the courage and decision of young people who have made sacrifices for the country and the people.