Because the Ming Dynasty was not as bad as Gao Xiaosong said. There are still many commendable wise kings, famous generals and celebrities in the Ming Dynasty. Gao Xiaosong once said in a program that the Ming Dynasty was the "Three No Dynasties", namely: no wise king, no generals, and no famous scholars. But this is not the case, so this was ridiculed by many experts. For this reason, Gao Xiaosong also said that? Grandstanding?, and the reason why experts evaluated him this way is because what Gao Xiaosong knew was only partial, and many of them were fabricated by later dynasties and were not historical facts.

It is sheer nonsense to say that there was no Mingjun in the dynasty. Take Zhu Yuanzhang as an example. Although he was the founding emperor, he did not have a strong background. The emperor, he knew that the foundation of the Ming Dynasty needed to be solid, so he killed corrupt officials and people with anti-dynasty intentions, but he did not hurt the people, nor was he dissolute, which made the foundation of the Ming Dynasty stronger, so in general For example, the fact that Zhu Yuanzhang, who was illiterate and illiterate, was able to do this is enough to show that he was a wise king. Moreover, there is a saying in the historical circles that a wise king is not necessarily a gentle and good person. On the contrary, a bad person is not necessarily a faint king. And Zhu Yuanzhang is similar to this kind of person.

I am the most opposed to the fact that there were no generals in the Ming Dynasty, because there were not only generals in the Ming Dynasty, but also many well-known generals, such as Xu Da, Yu Qian, Wang Yangming, Lan Yu and other generals, who were they? There is no one who has made great contributions, and no one has made great achievements. Take Lan Yu as an example. If it weren't for his wit and bravery, would he have succeeded in destroying the Yuan Dynasty? Therefore, it is not appropriate to generalize. The Ming Dynasty did not have no soldiers. It was just that the Ming Dynasty paid attention to civil affairs. Therefore, many soldiers were actually civil servants. However, they were not only civil servants. On the battlefield, they were also capable of military affairs. .

There is also the unknown scholar. I don’t know if it is because Zhu Yuanzhang was illiterate that led Gao Xiaosong to have this idea. Although Zhu Yuanzhang was uneducated, it does not mean that the Ming Dynasty was not. Mingshi, you must know that the most indispensable thing in the Ming Dynasty is Mingshi, such as: Wang Mingyang, Yang Shen, Jie Yuan, Xu Wei, Liu Bowen, etc. Which of these people is not a talented person, influencing future generations, and here we I want to emphasize one point, that is, among the four great masterpieces in our country, three great masterpieces came from the Ming Dynasty, namely: "Water Margin", "Journey to the West", and "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms". From this aspect alone, is the Ming Dynasty still lacking? Celebrity?

So I think Gao Xiaosong is just talking nonsense. If I have to say that he is telling the truth, then I can understand that the wise king, famous general and famous person in his heart are different from ordinary people, or Ming Dynasty These wise kings, famous generals, and celebrities only met his expectations.