Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - Debate questioning skills and common phrases
Debate questioning skills and common phrases

If you want to be an excellent debater, you certainly need to have good debating skills. I have compiled debate questioning techniques and common phrases for you. I hope it will be helpful to you.

Debating Questioning Skills

(1) Borrowing Strength to Fight

There is a trick in martial arts novels called "Borrowing Strength to Fight", which means deep internal strength The person can use the power of the opponent's attack to counterattack the opponent. This method can also be applied to debates. The reason why the positive side can use the negative side's examples to counterattack is because he has a series of theories that are not expressed verbally and that reinterpret words as a strong backing.

(2) Substituting the other side’s arguments

Eliminating the flawed parts of the other party’s arguments and replacing them with viewpoints or materials that are favorable to our side can often achieve the miraculous effect of “lifting a thousand pounds”. The technique of substituting what you have learned is a strong attack in debate theory. It requires debaters to have the courage to accept moves and fight back, so it is also a difficult and highly confrontational technique. Very persuasive argumentation skills. It is true that actual on-the-spot debates are eloquent, the situation changes, and there are more "transfers", requiring debaters to accurately summarize or interpret the other party's views and our own position at the time.

(3) Go with the flow

On the surface, we agree with the other party’s point of view, follow the other party’s logic to deduce, and in the derivation, set up certain reasonable obstacles according to our needs to make the other party The point of view cannot be established under the added conditions, or a conclusion that is completely opposite to that of the other party can be reached.

(4) Correcting the source

The so-called rectifying the source, in this article’s metaphorical sense, means to point out that the opponent’s arguments are not closely related to the topic or run counter to the topic, and to fundamentally correct the basis of the opponent’s arguments. point, and bring it into our "sphere of influence" so that it can serve our point of view. Compared with the "go with the flow" method of forward reasoning, this technique is exactly the opposite of its train of thought.

(5) Drawing fire under the hood

Tricky selective questions are one of the common offensive moves used by many debaters. Usually, this kind of question is premeditated. It can put people in a "difficult" situation. No matter which choice the other party makes, it will be detrimental to you. A specific technique for dealing with this kind of questioning is to extract a preset option from the other party's selective questions and launch a strong counter-examination, which fundamentally frustrates the other party's energy. This technique is to draw fire from the bottom of the cauldron. Of course, the actual situation in the debate field is very complicated. If you want to change from passive to active in the debate, mastering some skills of resisting the guest is only one factor. On the other hand, resisting the guest also needs to rely on very good improvisation.

(6) Exploiting contradictions

Since both sides of the debate are composed of four team members, conflicts often arise between the four team members during the debate. Even if they are the same team member, they will debate freely , because the words are spoken quickly, conflicts may also occur. Once such a situation occurs, we should seize it immediately and try our best to expand the opponent's contradictions so that it will be overwhelmed and unable to attack us. For example, when debating with the Cambridge team, the Cambridge team’s third debate argued that law is not morality, while the second debate argued that law is basic morality. These two views are obviously contradictory to each other. We took the opportunity to widen the rift between the two debaters on the other side and force the other side into a dilemma. Another example is that the other party first regarded "food and clothing" as the basic state of human existence during the debate, and later, under our fierce offensive, talked about the state of "hunger and cold". This is in conflict with the previous view, and our side Zi's ??spear, attack Zi's shield?, making the other party anxious, confused and speechless, speechless.

(7)? Leading the snake out of its hole?

In debates, there is often a stalemate: when the other party firmly defends its argument, no matter how we attack, the other party only uses a few words To deal with it, if you still adopt the method of frontal attack, you will have little effect. In this case, it is necessary to adjust the offensive method as soon as possible, adopt a roundabout method, start with seemingly unimportant issues, induce the opponent to leave the position, thereby attacking the opponent, and create a sensational effect in the minds of the judges and the audience.

(8) Li Daitao Zong?

When we encounter some logically or theoretically difficult debate topics, we have to use the Li Daitao Zhan method. , introducing new concepts to resolve difficulties. The significance of this tactic is to introduce a new concept to deal with the opponent, thereby ensuring that some key concepts in our argument are hidden behind and are not directly attacked by the opponent.

Debating is a very flexible process, and some of the more important techniques can be used during this process. Experience tells us that only by combining knowledge accumulation and debating skills can we achieve better results in debate competitions.

(9) Slow-down tactics

In daily life, we can see the following situations: when the fire brigade receives a call for help, they often answer it in a slow and calm tone. This gentleness The tone is to stabilize the speaker's emotions so that the other party can explain the situation correctly.

Commonly used phrases in debates

1. Thank you, Chairman. The other debater first took our definition out of context.

2. Thank you fellow debaters for your support of our point of view. With your support, I believe that our point of view will be easier for people to understand.

3. I am very grateful to the opponent’s fellow debaters for their suggestions. Now we will state our views.

4. Ask your opponent, what does an apple taste like? Think about it or taste it?

5. According to the opponent’s logic, does a seahorse also belong to a horse and a snail to a cow?

6. As the opponent’s fellow debater said, your argument can only be established in the case of Vague words? Strong words?

7. Theory teaches me a song, but only practice tells me why the Communist Party can save China.

8. The other party’s debate friends are always too lazy. Comprehensive education in college must rely on theory. Falling in love is always too simple, but practice is too difficult. Don’t force it on families who don’t understand theory. .

9. The world does not lack practice, it just lacks the eyes to discover practice.

10. Please ask the other party’s debate partner not to jump outside the topic of discussion.

11. Let’s not talk about it for the moment and take a step back.

12. Since the opponent’s fellow debater said that it is, then let me ask, how do you explain it?

13. What is the other party talking about? We are not opposed to this, but the question is?

14. Why does the other party’s debate partner deliberately avoid our questions? Do you already agree with our point of view?< /p>

15. The other party’s debate partner looks at the problem with a job-hopping eye. Of course, the world is as dark as crows.

16. The opponent’s fellow debater has repeatedly avoided answering our questions. I wonder if he has acquiesced in our point of view but is embarrassed to admit it?

17. First? Secondly? again.

18. Is it a bit confusing for the other debater to equate your fundamentality and necessity with the importance of the debate?

19. The other debater turns a blind eye to?

20. Is the other debater wishful thinking?

8 major things you should pay attention to in debates

1. Debaters must be familiar with the rules of debate.

2. Strive for innovation in self-presentation and show the integrity of the team

3. Exploration of links. For example, the arrangements for the remaining time.

4. Debate arrangement: seek stability in the first debate, and use powerful language. Strong ability to grasp the opinions of the entire debate. The second and third debates require on-the-spot adaptability, the ability to organize language in a timely manner, and the ability to grasp viewpoints; the fourth debate is the person who brings the entire debate to a successful conclusion. It is required to be thoughtful, high-level and enthusiastic, and to be able to emotionally move the judges and audience. As a four-point debater: the first is to listen, listen to the other party's shortcomings, and talk about them in the closing speech; the second is to make up for our mistakes, the third is to observe the situation on the spot, and the fourth is to There must be a wonderful closing sentence to impress the judges

5. Pay attention to the overall cooperation on the field: (Winning or losing in the debate does not only depend on the quality of individual performance. It is also a test of the debaters' tacit understanding.)< /p>

6. Debate skills

1) Pay attention to the use of body language: There is no absolute right or wrong in the debate questions. It depends on whose language is more convincing. Appropriate and rich body language can increase your persuasiveness.

2) The use of classic expressions in the free debate stage: The free debate stage is the climax of the entire debate competition. Each debater's language was brief, concise and highly targeted.

However, the thinking time given to the audience and judges is also relatively reduced. For example, the other debater has obviously gone off topic. Why does the other party's debater deliberately avoid our questions? Does he already agree with our point of view? We should use classic and common expressions frequently.

3). Pay attention to the key points and the content: After all, the debate is not a performance. It depends on whether your language is persuasive rather than how powerful you are.

4). Avoid flaws (1. Flaws in form, including timeouts, continuous speeches during free debates, etc.; 2. Flaws in viewpoints, and avoid making them absolute. 3. Pay attention to politeness issues: Debates are not When quarreling, be sure to control your emotions and pay attention to your demeanor. 4. Pay attention to rules (especially for novices) 7. The content should be based on the topic. Establish a space to highlight your own advantages. Have your own routine and stick to the topic.

8. Skills in attacking and defending.

A: Seek novelty. What is new cannot be logically new in terms of perspective, because seeking novelty must not only impress the audience but also make it easy for the audience to accept it. Logical newness is not easy for people to accept in a short period of time

< p> B: For the questions raised by the opponent, you can push each other, there is no need to answer with an absolute answer

C: Any point of view is useful to both sides, it depends on how you use it

D: To catch the other party’s loopholes, you must be precise! You cannot guess the other party subjectively

E: Give examples to be knowledgeable. What examples should be given, and how should they be used to be offensive

F: Be well prepared!!!

People who read? Debate Questioning Techniques and Common Phrases? also read:

p>

1. What are the questioning techniques for the second debate

2. Debate skills and commonly used sentences

3. Practical debate skills and common phrases

4. Debate skills: commonly used sentences in debates