I Have A Dream

Sartre said that people are born to suffer from freedom. Freedom is freedom of choice, which is essentially a kind of "freedom" because people can't escape the fate of choice. People are social animals, so people inevitably choose to understand and love the people around them, which is the nature of being born. However, everyone is born different, just like there are no two identical leaves. Moreover, the human mind is more complex and dark than the veins on the leaves. Therefore, it is doomed that people will never really understand each other. I am me, and I am doomed not to understand others with my thinking. If two people really want to know each other, because of love or other reasons, then the more I try to understand, I will find that the distance between the two people is only getting farther and farther. Because the more we understand, the more we can understand how different the distance between us, the distance between our hearts, the distance between our thinking and the shape of our hearts are. Love will fade away, and the desire to understand will become a distant desire, so people are doomed to be lonely. We long for a world of great harmony, but if the world really has only one thought, what a terrible and cold world it will be, just as the human completion plan in EVA shows. Since 1789, all mankind has been fighting for freedom and freedom of choice. In that era, people who have freedom shouted "every man will be a king". However, in modern times, we find that we are never free to freedom, from loneliness to helplessness, and from one cycle to another. Where is the way out, or can't we escape the fate that we were born to be human?

I don't want freedom, who wants freedom!

(Animation: <; Gundam SEED> The name of an MS in.)

What is freedom?

Freedom can be divided into broad sense freedom and narrow sense freedom. People's understanding of freedom in today's world can be said to be varied. Generally speaking, there are the following kinds of freedom: First, slave-like freedom, in which people are happy with the boss's reward, proud of the boss's praise, and proud of the boss's charity. People once described it as "like a horse's triumphant neigh when it throws its owner off its back, all it can get is that the reins are pulled." . In our real life, some people pursue American-style freedom, but are Americans really free? No, although they wanted to be free, they didn't get freedom at all. The so-called freedom they got was narrow freedom, freedom of self-deception, and freedom of speech and sex seemed to be free, but were they really free? No, they are not free at all, because they still have an invisible rope around their necks: money.

for some people, there are a lot of money, but this is only a few people. There is a popular song that once wrote: "Some people sell their children for you, others go to jail for you", "How many people are you fascinated by! Just because I was fascinated by you, I was led by it. "Money, you bloody knife." With the economic inequality in real life, people have to be busy for money, contribute their own money, and become slaves of money. However, people still envy the freedom of capitalist society, but who thought that the freedom of capitalism is the freedom of slaves, the real freedom belongs to the rich, and the public is the slaves of the rich. That is to say, one end of the bill is put on a person's neck and the other end is put on a person's hand.

Money controls people's freedom. No, it should be the person who owns money that controls people's freedom. People are slaves to money, no, people are slaves to individual rich people. If we poor people have no money, you must find ways to earn, sell your physical strength, your arrogance, your gentleness, your wisdom and even your personality. Aren't you a slave then? You have no money, can you not be a slave? You have to live, you have to eat, you have to support your family, you have to provide for the elderly, and you can't move without money. Where is your freedom then? Your freedom is consumed in serving your boss. Where is your speech? Your speech is in that pile of waste paper, on that piece of paper that nobody pays attention to. The speech of rich people is much more useful than yours. Can your speech surpass the speech of rich people? Where are all your freedoms? All your freedom is in the competition between people. What else can you be free? Besides, does your freedom have the meaning of freedom?

Generally speaking, labor is a commodity, and labor can be bought and sold. However, the expression that labor is a commodity itself means the existence of the relationship between master and servant. To put it bluntly, it is the employment relationship, which is a temporary relationship between master and servant. No matter how beautiful your theory is and how elegant your name is, can you tear down the relationship we are talking about? If you can't push this relationship, you can't escape the situation of not being free. Maybe you want to say, according to this, we can't be free? Of course, don't be so pessimistic. Please read below-

Some people say that we should talk about freedom and publicize the idea of freedom. I said, well, there are still some illiterate people in rural areas of China. You should also publicize them and see how they react. Is it not freedom? I'll give you a week, and if you find it difficult, I'll give you a longer time, a month. Some people don't talk for a month, even if you talk for a year, they can't really understand your freedom. Why? If the wolf boy is still alive, you can tell him about your liberalism, not to mention one year. It is useless for you to talk about it for ten years, because he has no ability to accept freedom. How can he realize the freedom you said? When you say freedom of speech, he doesn't have the ability to speak. Where can he have freedom of speech?

If only one or two members of the U.S. Congress have the ability to speak, and others only have the ability to be listeners, is this the freedom of speech you want? If that's really the case, I'll make other people stupid (or be bought and fooled by me), and the speech in that state is absolutely free. But does this freedom of speech make sense? Because other people have no ability to be free, they (they) are just fooled and used by some people with ulterior motives. What is freedom for those who have no ability to be free and will only be fooled by others? This can only be regarded as narrow freedom, the freedom of slaves. Do we need this freedom? No, we should need freedom in a broad sense. "More than 1 years ago, Mr. Yan Fu, the pioneer of China's reform, used different translations when translating western works. freedom was' freedom' and liberty was' freedom', but the translations of future generations were not inherited, but all of them were translated into' freedom', which more or less caused China people's one-sided understanding of the concept of western freedom.

my personal understanding is that freedom is a kind of basic freedom, which means that the body is not restricted and is the freedom of action. Liberty is a higher level of freedom, which refers to freedom in thought, consciousness and personality. I prefer to translate it as' autonomy'. Only when people gain complete freedom, that is, freedom of action, can they achieve freedom of thinking and autonomy of personality, that is, liberty. I think that in the process of children's growth, the state of' freedom' is divided into three stages: first, freedom of action, freedom of eating, drinking, sleeping, climbing, touching, exploring and playing, that is, freedom. Only with this basic freedom can a child be independent-his spirit, personality and will are all independent, which also leads to independent thinking and free thinking, which is liberty. After fully gaining such independence, children's freedom has risen to a higher level, that is, freedom of behavior, making their own decisions and choices, and being responsible for their actions. Simply put, freedom of action leads to freedom of thinking and ultimately to freedom of action. After talking about freedom for a long time, where is the discipline? It is in this freedom: the first feeling that a completely free person gets is not that he can do whatever he wants, but that he must take full responsibility for his life and actions and take full responsibility for the consequences of his actions. It is this extremely heavy and severe sense of responsibility that is freely derived. Can he not consciously abide by discipline? " ("Give Children Freedom" wizard). Give the child freedom. Can he or she have a sense of responsibility? Nowadays, college students have a sense of responsibility. When they (they) make serious mistakes, they do have a sense of responsibility. However, the cost of some people is too great, so great that they lose a good opportunity, so great that they destroy their lives and even lose their lives. Is this freedom worth pursuing? No, this kind of freedom is narrow freedom, and it lacks the ability to support it. To talk about freedom to a child who has no ability is tantamount to pulling out the seedlings, and it is tantamount to a baby who has no one to teach him or her to walk. Among children, some people are disabled because of a certain behavior, some people cause serious losses because of a certain behavior, and some people even die because of a certain behavior. For example, if a student dies by secretly taking a bath in the river, freedom is freedom, but what is lost will never be found back. The advocacy of "giving children freedom" has become the culprit.

This is a trivial matter. It doesn't seem to matter. Let's take a look at the situation of our college students. "I don't know when decadence became very popular. Especially after the college entrance examination, those who failed to enter the university were very decadent, and those who did were even more decadent. I remember when I was a freshman, I contacted my classmates in high school who were studying in college. Everyone almost said,' I have fallen now!' The reason is that after going to college, I either sleep or play games, read novels or go shopping. In order to cope with the exam, I started reading textbooks only a few days before the exam. I think I seem to have spent a semester in such a muddle, and later I don't know why I know I should start studying. Nowadays, most children grow up under the care of their parents, and they are very dependent. Because many parents have paved the way for their children all their lives, children don't have to do anything else at all, just follow the road paved by their parents. If I hadn't left home to study in other places, there were many simple things I didn't know how to do. It was very difficult for my parents to do the simple things themselves. " What does it mean that our education has such kind of freedom? That is the decline of our nation, and it is the degradation of our nation.

Many reactions are not about freedom at all, but about independence. Parents don't let their children operate independently when they are young, and when they grow up, they lose their independent ability (or don't have independent ability). In our future analysis, we can know that the possession of our human ability is a process, and we just want to discuss how to realize the possession of independent ability. Only when we have independent thoughts can we have independent free thoughts, that is to say, we can realize what kind of freedom is the best freedom. What is the best freedom? Is it slave freedom? Is it thoughtless stupidity? I think what else can it be except freedom in a broad sense? We leave the best question of freedom to the students to think for themselves, which is our broad sense of freedom.

To realize freedom in a broad sense, we must let people have independent ability, call for independent ability, and let people's independent ability rebuild the world. This is the ideal of Educational Revolution. /dulijun

Freedom of mind is everyone's desire, and most people are not free of mind (who knows a few people who are free of mind? )

it is very difficult to get spiritual freedom!

1) Have a firm belief in spiritual freedom.

Some people dare not, others can't, and many people don't think about it.

2) Recognize the characteristics and defects of your traditional culture.

rebelling against the defects of traditional culture requires fearless spirit, which is not shared by everyone.

3) The beginning of rebellion is the beginning of the freedom of the mind.

4) The price of freedom is huge, and not everyone can afford it.

5) Rebellion may not win, and whether you can master your own destiny and transcend spiritual suffering are all major themes in life.