First, just now the other debater said that after a period of time, urbanization will no longer be urbanization. Are other debaters going to tell me that Shanghai and Nanjing are urbanized, and their quality of life is lower than ours?

Second, just now, we demonstrated that our urbanization is a static process, but we didn't know that urbanization is a process of continuous improvement from problems! Third, just now, the other debater said that rural areas cannot be transformed into cities, and cities cannot be transformed into rural areas. Then the opposing debater should be a direction of our new China construction!

Third, what is urbanization? Urbanization is a process, and urbanization is a dynamic process. Although the other party does not deny it, why do you always look at the problem from a static point of view in confrontation? You are always perfectly urbanized. How can this work? Trying to improve the chorus of the audience and the judges is your plan, but it is tantamount to shooting yourself in the foot.

Fourth, the other side's understanding of the quality of life, we say that the quality of life and the standard of living are two concepts, why do you just seize the improvement of the standard of living and say that it proves the improvement of the quality of life? When did we say that the improvement of living standards only pays attention to the spirit and not the material? Quality of life is both qualitative and quantitative. You don't understand each other, just playing dumb.

Summary is a kind of written material to review and analyze the completion of a certain stage of work or a certain work afterwards, including achievements, existing problems, experiences and lessons, etc., to provide help and reference for future work.

Summary is a kind of written material to review and analyze the completion of a certain stage of work or a certain work afterwards, including achievements, existing problems, experiences and lessons, etc., to provide help and reference for future work.

Seeking truth from facts and proceeding from reality is the basic principle of abstract writing, but in the practice of abstract writing, it is not uncommon to violate this principle. Some people think that "three points of work and seven points of blowing" exaggerates achievements, conceals shortcomings and reports good news instead of bad news in the summary. This bad style of cheating and boasting for credit is not good for the unit, the country, the cause and the individual, and must be resolutely prevented.