After carefully reading a masterpiece, everyone must have a lot of thoughts about life or things. Let us write a review and record your gains and thoughts. But what are the requirements for reading the review? The following is my review of "Cao Cao" compiled for everyone. It is for reference only. You are welcome to read it. Thoughts after reading "Cao Cao" 1

Should I continue to run forward? Finally, I have my own choice. By the way, this is the vegetable market. Just as I was watching the naughty water in the clear spring happily rolling forward, suddenly, a few crystal water drops splashed on my face and body. Suddenly, a wave came and I was covered in the water unpreparedly. One day, the tiger came back. He walked with a limp and his long trousers covered the tiger's feet. There was nothing wrong with it.

Whenever people think of Cao Cao, they will think of the white-faced traitor and the phrase "holding the emperor hostage to order the princes". But after reading "Cao Cao", I understood that this was just a one-sided evaluation of Cao Cao. He was a very capable person who had made certain contributions to political achievements. For example: after the war, the Central Plains region experienced the tragic scene of "white bones covering the plains", and agricultural production suffered extremely serious damage. It was Cao Cao's policy of farming that allowed the Central Plains agriculture to recover.

Also, Cao Cao broke the standard of appointing officials based on their family status since the end of the Han Dynasty. He announced that those who were born in humble origins, had low family status, and were short-term but had expertise should be re-employed. As long as they have real talents and practical learning, , even people with some small shortcomings in life can be used according to their talents. For example: Zhang Liao and Xu Huang under Cao Cao... Although they were from humble backgrounds, they had certain skills and were promoted to generals.

Cao Cao not only cherished talents, but also used the strengths of others to make up for his own shortcomings in battle, changed passivity into initiative, turned disadvantages into advantages, defeated more with less, and defeated strong with weak. For example: In 199 AD, Yuan Shao wanted to destroy Cao Cao in one fell swoop with a superior force of 100,000 troops. Cao Cao only had 20,000 troops at that time. When he learned that the enemy was going to launch a general offensive, his co-conspirators analyzed the situation and took advantage of Yuan Shao's weaknesses to pacify the north.

By reading this book, I learned a lot of knowledge that is not found in textbooks and how to look at a person. I would also like to remind everyone, never say that Cao Cao is a traitor in the future. In my mind, he is a very remarkable person. Finally, I came to a conclusion: we can’t just look at one side of things, we must look at the whole picture. Thoughts after reading "Cao Cao" 2

As soon as people mention him, they will think of the white-faced traitor on the stage. We just see Cao Cao as sinister. Cunning side, but did not see his country-ruling side.

In fact, he is a very capable person. I think that after many years of war, agricultural production has been severely damaged, so Cao Cao actively summoned people to open up wasteland and cultivate fields. Those farmers can be directly managed by the state. If you do not perform corvee labor, you will only give 40 to 50% of the grain to the state during the harvest. Cao Cao's move enabled the agriculture of the Central Plains to recover quickly.

Also, Cao Cao's ability to know people well and make good use of them is a good advantage. He broke the tradition of hereditary official positions since the Han Dynasty and announced the reuse of those who were of low origin but had expertise. Such as Cao Cao's men Zhang Liao and Xu Huang. Although they came from poor families, they all had certain skills and were promoted to generals. He laid the foundation for conquering everything in the world in the future.

Cao Cao's military talent is also very outstanding. In war, he was often able to make up for his own shortcomings with his strengths, take the initiative, turn weaknesses into strengths, and created many battle formations in which the few defeated the many and the weak defeated the strong. For example, in the Battle of Gongdu in 200 AD, Yuan Shao wanted to eliminate Cao Cao in one fell swoop with a superior force of 100,000 troops. At that time, Cao Cao only had 20,000 troops. When Cao Cao knew that Yuan Shao was going to launch an attack, he analyzed the terrain with his advisers and took advantage of Yuan Shao's indecision and internal disunity to devise a plan to defeat Yuan Shao.

By reading books about Cao Cao, I not only gained a comprehensive understanding of the character Cao Cao, but also gained a lot of historical knowledge. It's a special inspiration to me. I also made great progress in Hongqi Primary School. In the midterm exam, I scored 82 points in Chinese, 79 points in mathematics, and 83 points in English! Thoughts after reading "Cao Cao" 3

I read an article "Cao Cao" written by Zhao Shen a few days ago, and I felt like some of the words were stuck in my bones, and I couldn't help but feel unhappy!

In recent years, both in academia and among the people, there has been a craze for the Three Kingdoms, Cao Cao craze, which is still in the ascendant. After reading Zhao Shen's article, I feel imprinted by Yi Zhongtian's evaluation of Cao in "A Taste of the Three Kingdoms" Deeper, here, I will not comment on whether Yi Zhongtian and Zhao Shen's historical evaluation of Cao Cao is pertinent. I just want to look at that period of history from the perspective of an ordinary person, and make a choice about the characters at that time from a grassroots perspective.

If I were a common person living in the troubled times of the Three Kingdoms, and I was asked to make a choice, whether I would choose Cao Cao or Liu Bei as my ruler, I would say without hesitation, "I choose Liu Bei."

Indeed, from the perspective of today’s people, Cao Cao is indeed a far-sighted, talented and strategic politician, military strategist, poet, a traitor in troubled times, and a tycoon of a generation. But for ordinary people like us, these auras are not the same as those of ordinary people like us. What do I do? What I care about is whether my life can be preserved under his rule? Do I not need to be afraid? Can my personal dignity be respected to a certain extent? Can I live a decent life on this basis? But for these, as ordinary people, I am afraid there is no guarantee at all under Cao Cao's rule. Although Cao Cao, after nearly thirty years of campaigning from east to west, defeated the Yellow Turbans, destroyed Lu Bu, Zhang Xiu, Tao Qian, Yuan Shao, Yuan Shu, Liu Biao, Ma Teng, and Zhang Lu, and completed the great cause of unifying northern China, as the saying goes, " The great cause of unification was forged with the lives of millions of soldiers and the pain, blood and tears of tens of thousands of people. Frequent wars have resulted in "ten rooms and nine empty rooms" north of the Yellow River. If the battle is defeated, how many soldiers will be buried in the sea of ??fire, drowned in the bottom of the river, or killed by the sword! If I were a commoner under Cao Cao's rule, it would be difficult for me to live to see the day when the cause of reunification is completed!

In addition, for the people under the rule of his opponents, there is no life protection at all; Cao Cao sent troops to Xuzhou to conquer Tao Qian to avenge his father, and massacred them wantonly; Returner". In the Battle of Guandu, Yuan Shao was trapped and killed with 80,000 surrendered troops. Internally, he "took the emperor to order the princes" and killed Empress Mao, the head of state Dong Cheng, and Concubine Dong Guifei who were pregnant with Liujia who opposed him. He also killed Bian Rang, Xu You, Hua Tuo, and his ministers Xun Yu and Cui. Yan, Kong Rong, Yang Xiu and other famous ministers and celebrities. There are even "murders in dreams" incidents caused by suspicion. I believe that as Cao Cao's ministers and subordinates, they simply feel like "accompanying the emperor like a tiger", trembling and walking on thin ice, with no safety or dignity at all. Although the famous saying "I would rather betray the world than let the world betray me" has not been verified by official history, it is also consistent with the consistent style of this traitor.

Let’s take a look at his opponent Liu Bei. This grassroots hero, a descendant of the Han royal family and a mat weaver and shoe seller, spent the first half of his life on the move, often facing the dilemma of being defeated and fleeing, and living under the shelter of others. However, he He was deeply loved by the princes, celebrities and people at that time. There are many positive comments about him in "Three Kingdoms". Let's not talk about this for now. Let's just say that in 207 AD, Cao Cao led his troops south and Liu Bei defeated Xinye. In the process of retreat, Inspired by Liu Bei's love for the people and benevolence, hundreds of thousands of people refused to leave him and followed Liu Bei. As a result, Liu Bei's march was very slow. Cao Cao's vanguard was about to catch up. The situation was critical. His subordinates suggested Liu Bei abandoned the people and fled, but Liu Bei couldn't bear to do so. He still led the people and marched slowly. In the end, he was overtaken by Cao's cavalry, which almost led to the annihilation of the entire army. In his later years, when Liu Bei was caring for an orphan in Baidi City, the last words he left to his son Liu Chan were "Don't do evil things because they are small, and don't do good things because they are small." That is to say, don't do a bad thing just because it is small. Don’t stop doing a good deed just because it’s small. Comparing the two, we can see the huge personality gap between Cao Cao and Liu Bei. Because of this, famous ministers Zhuge Liang, famous scholar Pang Tong, famous generals Guan Yu, Zhang Fei, Zhao Yun, Huang Zhong, Ma Chao, etc. all followed him for life. The names of monarchs and ministers will go down in history.

Although the final historical outcome is the return of the Three Kingdoms to the Jin Dynasty, neither the Cao Wei established by Cao Cao nor the Shu Han established by Liu Bei ultimately unified the world and served as a wedding dress for others, but the fate of their successors was different. It's a world of difference; Cao Cao's descendants were manipulated by the Sima family and became puppets, like a revolving door, they were constantly being deposed and established, and their fate was tragic, some died but some had no intact corpses. Although Liu Bei's son Liu Chan was devoid of virtue and incompetence, he preferred to live in Xishu. After reigning for forty-two years, when Deng Ai's troops came to the city, he surrendered to the Sima family, saving the people from misery. Finally, he was able to die peacefully and enjoy his old age. From this, I have to believe what the ancients said, that is, the differences in morality among our ancestors led to the different destinies of the descendants of the two surnames Cao and Liu. A generation of treacherous men has dominated the whole life, but how could they know that the government agencies were planning to do so? How could they imagine that future generations would be so miserable?

Wow, is it destiny? It’s a matter of fact! Thoughts after reading "Cao Cao" 4

Watching other classes hit the ball again and again, watching the gap on the score sheet getting wider and wider. The plane took away the cutest sister. Even with the video, there are few opportunities to touch that soft skin with one's own hands. There are 14 foot formations in this military parade? The fox happily went in, and the crow locked the door. The fox felt that something was wrong, and wanted to escape, but the doors and windows were locked by the crow. As a result, he was bitten by the puppy like a fox.

Whenever people mention Cao Cao, they will think of the white-faced treacherous official on the stage and the phrase "The narrow emperor orders the princes."

But after reading the book "Cao Cao", I understood that this is not a fair evaluation of Cao Cao. In fact, Cao Cao was a very capable person, for example, as a result of the war. The tragic scene of "white bones than the plains" appeared in the Central Plains, and agricultural production suffered extremely serious damage. So Cao Cao adopted the policy of cultivating farmland, which restored agriculture in the Central Plains.

Cao Cao not only searched for talents, but also used people's strengths in war. In 199 AD, Yuan Shao wanted to eliminate Cao Cao in one fell swoop with a superior force of 100,000 troops.

Cao Cao only had 20,000 troops at that time. When he learned that Yuan Shao was going to launch a general offensive, he worked with him to analyze the situation and took advantage of Yuan Shao's hesitation and internal disunity to use various strategies to defeat Yuan Shao and pacify the north.

After reading the book "Cao Cao", I saw how Cao Cao used talents and how he used people's strengths and weaknesses.

By reading this book, I learned a lot of knowledge that is not available in textbooks. Know how to treat a person. Finally, I still want to remind everyone that in the future, don’t say that Cao Cao is a traitor. Those are some conservative views. In my opinion, Cao Cao will always be a great person.