The dual-track pension system is a special product of the transition from planned economy to market economy. The so-called "dual track system" means that people with different employment natures adopt different retirement pension systems. In Li Yuhe's famous saying, the pension retired by government agencies and institutions and the pension retired by enterprise personnel are two cars running on the same road, but not on the same road. Specifically, there are three differences. First, there are different ways of overall planning: enterprise personnel are paid by units and employees themselves according to certain standards, and institutions and institutions are funded by the government; Second, the payment channels are different: enterprise personnel are paid by self-raised accounts, and government agencies and institutions are paid by finance; Third, the standards of enjoyment are different. The pension standard of government agencies and institutions is much higher than that of enterprise retirees. At present, the gap is about 3 to 5 times. Maybe it made sense to introduce such a system at that time. However, with the passage of time and the deepening of reform and opening up, the disadvantages of the "dual track system" are becoming more and more obvious, and its irrationality and illegality have reached the time when it must be solved. To this end, many experts and scholars, NPC deputies and CPPCC members have repeatedly called for the abolition of the "dual track system" in some public occasions. Enterprise retirees are the main force of the working class in China, and they are the parents of food and clothing. We can't marginalize these "active ministers" because of reform and opening up. No oil workers braved the cold to exploit oil, no steel workers fought for smelting steel at high temperature, no coal miners risked their lives to exploit coal, and no textile workers worked tirelessly. How can there be China oil today, how can there be a big turnaround in steel, and how can there be reform and opening up today? Employees have worked hard all their lives. On the one hand, they have accumulated funds for the country to overcome poverty, on the other hand, they also dream of enjoying their old age in a "powerful country". The dual-track pension system is a serious injustice to employees who also contribute. "This is the same root, the contribution is the same, and the treatment is three times lower. How can it be fair? " Where is the difficulty of the "dual track system"? Liu Yongfu, when the Ministry of Social Security paid the minister, said that retirees would get 500 million yuan if they added a dollar; If each person increases 100 yuan, it will be 50 billion yuan. The implication is that I can't afford it Seems to be stumped by money. But sasac director, Li Rongrong and Xiang Huaicheng both said they would take money. Is it really a question of money? Eating and drinking with public funds, traveling with public funds, and building office buildings cost tens of thousands of dollars a year, but few people feel distressed, and they have never heard anyone say that they can't afford it, but they have to spend tens of billions to abolish an obviously unreasonable "dual track system", but they are so stingy. Is this a question of money or a question of ruling philosophy? There is money, people are alive, and there will be money wherever they pay attention to what problems. Recently, the "National Ten Articles" decided that the state would invest 400 billion yuan to promote it, with the focus on solving people's livelihood problems. The integration of pensions for retired workers is the most practical and vital livelihood, and it is a good thing to follow the will of the people and win the hearts of the people. Doing this well is not only a boost to expanding domestic demand, but also a boost to people's hearts. It is better not to boil the soup than not to boil it. Instead of wasting time and effort to adjust our policies every year, it is better to cut the gordian knot and bid farewell to the "dual track system" unswervingly. When General Secretary Hu visited enterprise retirees in Inner Mongolia, he said, "Retirees have contributed to national construction and development, and the party and government will not forget you." The economic conditions are ripe, and the general secretary has spoken. What are you waiting for?