If you have the chance to come in, you can see the grand theory of "lvlipeng99999" the benevolent man. Ling Moxue felt that the poster's problem could be ignored. Why? The problem with this senior brother's remarks can be said to be very harmful. Let's listen to Mo Xue's sentence-by-sentence analysis of where it falls:

First: "According to the text, interpret the meaning of "The Resentment of the Buddha of the Three Worlds...!! Why does my friend have to get stuck in the text?". What I want to say is: if you close your eyes as soon as you see names and forms, you will "not differentiate". There is no need to spread the Twelve Parts of the Tripitaka. Those who are truly enlightened can observe all the Dharma seeds contained in their true hearts and practice based on the expression of their own hearts. Even if you reach the level of a holy Bodhisattva, after the so-called "enlightenment and elimination", you still have to practice with the Buddha and discern what the Buddha means. As an ordinary person, it is impossible to keep one's conscious mind from making distinctions. Even if you do it, it has nothing to do with proving your sincerity, it is nothing more than becoming an idiot.

The secret meaning of the Buddha is indeed not found in words; however, when ordinary people learn about it, they not only stay close to the words, but also need to go deep into the scriptures and ask good teachers for advice on every question they have. Unfortunately, good teachers who can interpret Buddhist scriptures are extremely rare nowadays. As the poster explains it, the vast majority of fake and good friends on the Internet just say the same thing, which is nothing more than secularizing and simplifying Buddhism. Those who make Buddhism gradually sink and even disappear are the ones who destroy Buddhism!

Second: "Because all sentient beings have various diseases in their hearts, Buddhas can teach various Dharma. As soon as we jumped out of the pit, we fell into the well again. As soon as we put down this thing, we grabbed that one. This is how we live until we die. ...."

The saying of the benevolent is "countermeasures and cures"; the preaching of countermeasures according to the different abilities of sentient beings is only a very small part of the Buddhist scriptures. It is not the true purpose of Buddhism. As for the true purpose of Buddhism, you will be able to know it when you have sufficient merit and merit, and then you will be able to believe in the true Dharma of Buddhism, and then you will be able to grasp the root of Buddhism and no longer be confused by the vast sea. They even simplify Buddhism into "how to be a human being"!

Benevolent people advise people not to put down and grab again. But I ask: So what if I let go? Is it the conscious mind? What does it mean when you say let go or not when you are sleeping without dreams? Even if you don’t welcome or reject, you have nothing to take or give up, what’s the point of seeing through and letting go? What's more, when impermanence comes and karma changes, I wonder what can be done by letting go?

This kind of delusion that the aware mind can be transformed into the true mind without discrimination, often results in the great crime of lying without understanding. Great virtues from all walks of life should not deceive themselves and others, and achieve uninterrupted karma!

Third: "We live in concepts and eventually die in concepts. The fundamental purpose of Buddhism is to help us break these concepts and break these deep-rooted concepts since beginningless kalpas. Nothing else."

What is the concept that the benevolent person wants to talk about? Does it mean knowing separately? This is what you have been criticizing. If you don't differentiate, you will have no concept. Then, you can practice the method of sleeping without dreams and receiving anesthesia. Why do you need to nag and persuade people to have no thoughts and no distinctions?

If we say "breaking these deep-rooted concepts since beginningless kalpas" is "the fundamental purpose of Buddhism". This is an out-and-out slander of Buddhism!

Fourth: "Buddha Dharma is real, and it really tells us how to deal with others and how to be freed from the pain of life after life."

A simple sentence, Conduct yourself to the extreme. What will be the result? In the next life, you can get a human body again, and you will be rich and noble. Since we will never violate the Five Precepts and Ten Good Deeds, can we surpass this as a human being? If you cultivate the definition of desire on this basis, you will be born in the realm of desire; if you further cultivate the first jhāna and even the fourth jhāna, you will be born in the world of jhāna and even the fourth jhāna; until the concentration of neither perception nor non-conception is reached, it is the ultimate.

Being a human being is called "the good law of man and nature", not "Buddhism". Even liberation from life and death cannot be regarded as strictly "Buddhist Dharma", but "Arahant Dharma" and "Pratyekabuddha Dharma". Only by enlightening your mind and cultivating the Bodhisattva path for countless kalpas can you truly experience Buddhism.

During the Dharma Ending Period, Buddhism has been misunderstood to this extent! What is it but simplifying and destroying Buddhism? For those who like to be a good person, please study "Disciple Rules", "Yan Family Instructions", "Construction of Socialist Spiritual Civilization", "Chicken Soup for the Soul", "Carnegie's Quotes", "Bacon on Life" and so on. However, it is impossible to "free yourself from the pain of life after life" after reading it all. Because this goal cannot be solved by being a human being.

Fifth: "The true Buddha Dharma is inseparable from the worldly Dharma. You cannot find the Dharma without the worldly world.

”

This sentence is a good thing. However, it is already contrary to the previous argument: I would like to ask, the poster’s request for names and appearances, is it a mundane law, and is it separated from the six dusts and six consciousnesses?

People are learning the Dharma of the world, but you teach them not to get stuck in the words. Here you also call them to "not be separated from the worldly awareness", and they are all covered by the tongue! This is a mental method that involves enlightenment but not cultivation. Note that it is not just enlightenment but not cultivation, but cultivation after enlightenment. "Enlightenment" is like you want to go to Beijing and have a clear route. If the route is not clear, you will walk for countless kalpas but still get no results. Then, in the end, I didn’t even know where I died... I’m sorry, my words were a bit harsh, but they were words from the bottom of a fool’s heart...”

Cultivation before enlightenment is to have sufficient qualifications; If you don't have the qualifications, you will never have the opportunity to realize it. After enlightenment, you can practice it because you have realized your true heart. You can no longer practice similar practices like ordinary people. It is said that the practice after enlightenment is not only complete. It is revealed from the heart, and all the practices are without leakage. There are very few people who know this truth. As the saying goes, "there are countless people dead in the mountains."

For countless kalpas, even people who have done the most evil have done a lot. How about being a good person? However, these actions have no real benefits, and the fields of blessing will eventually be exhausted. Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva categorically said: "The thoughts and actions of all sentient beings in Jambudvipa are nothing but sins." ! "

Ask: What should you do? How can you get real benefits?

Eighth: "Then what is Buddhism! ? Stop asking and let it go! Just let it go! ”

There is nothing sublime about letting go. At least it needs to have a sign: it must have the sign of “letting go.” Even more clever people don’t even need to let go. As long as they don’t care about whether to let go. Just let it go. As the saying goes, "If you can't see form, form is empty."

However, Grandma Tathagata's sincere heart made a verse: "No mind is Zen, and no mind is like a thousand mountains." It is said in the Surangama Sutra: "Destroy all seeing, hearing, and awareness, and keep quiet within yourself, just like the shadows of Dharma dust!" ". It can also be seen that seeing through and letting go, no matter whether there is a form or not, is far away from the true Dharma of the Buddha.

Those kinds of people like the above have fallen into empty views and have been unable to understand the true meaning of the Tathagata for a long time. They just follow the flow of karma. It is not evil to practice it yourself without speaking. If someone with a great reputation teaches others, it is to deny the disciples' Dharma, body, wisdom and destiny.

"lvlipeng99999" A benevolent person will not learn. The above does not sound good, but please ask yourself, have you made any progress every day by letting go of non-discrimination? Is Buddhism really that simple? Imagine if it is useful when impermanence comes. "Real". It can be practiced and realized. The meaning of the Three Vehicles Bodhi is clear. Please abandon wrong views and follow the teachings.

Another: The poster asked, because there is no context, I don’t know what the question is. I will answer it as follows:

The nature of a Bodhisattva cannot be said to be “determined existence or non-existence”. Please refer to the Upasaka Sutra.

If we ask about sentient beings and merciless beings, the difference is that the former has the body of the Tathagata, but the latter does not; the former is like you and me, and the latter is like wood, stone and rubble.

Namo's own master, Sakyamuni Buddha