There is a famous saying in NBA: there may be parallel champions, but there will be no parallel MVP. Because every regular season MVP has been tested by dozens of games in a season, which proves that this player is the leader of the league at a certain period. So far, there are two MVPs in Curry, and Durant has one. Only Leonard didn't win this honor, which directly shows the essential difference between a superstar and a star. Of course, Leonard is the youngest of the three. Next season, with the help of a group of powerful Clippers teammates, MVP will definitely have a lot to offer. But Leonard hasn't reached the height of the other two. 2. Close the library ③ > Durant (2)= Leonard (2) Who has the highest historical position? Curry KD Leonard's six honors are compared, and the gap is embarrassing. If the regular season MVP represents personal strength, then the championship proves the team cooperation ability of the players. Curry is still in the leading position among the three, and the three championship rings are very dazzling; Durant also won two consecutive championships after joining the Warriors; Leonard won the championship on behalf of the two teams respectively. It can be seen that in the comparison of team honor, all three people have excellent results, neck and neck.

Although Durant and Curry have separated, the discussion about who is better and greater is not over yet. Although the actual situation can be used as a reference, it is not entirely correct. For example, Curry participated in the Warriors this season, but the Warriors' record can only support them to win the first championship. No wonder Paul painted it green, "Call Durant back quickly". This logic has certain scientific elements, but it is not truth. So, how should Curry and Durant position themselves? Come to a conclusion first. Although both ESPN and CBS believe that Curry's history is ahead of Durant, I think Durant's history is one or two places higher than Curry's. The reason is that Durant is the absolute core of the Warriors' two consecutive championships. He even deliberately gave FMVP to Curry in the finals, and Curry couldn't grasp it. Therefore, Durant's control and influence in the Warriors Finals far exceeds Curry's. And the more powerful, the less sense of existence in the library.

Curry can also break out in the finals, but only if there is no Durant. Curry can crush Harden with 0 points in the first half and 33 points in the second half, but this performance is only in the Western Conference semifinals, and it is impossible to complete the FMVP vote. Most of the warriors' games are to see Curry in prosperity, Thompson in adversity and Durant in despair. With the championship, the finals naturally have the opportunity to compete for MVP. This award represents a player's core position on the highest stage. Unfortunately, this award has always been Curry's weakness. So far, he has never won once. Perhaps many fans will complain that Curry, especially the 15 finals, is considered to be the most controversial. On the whole, Curry does have the qualification to be elected.

However, in the most critical and strategic fourth game, Iguodala played a role in turning the tide, which directly led to Curry's missed FMVP. In the finals of 17 and 18, Durant's performance was undisputed, which played an irreplaceable role in both the overall performance and the final victory at the crucial moment, and even won FMVP twice. Leonard also has two FMVP, but compared with Durant, the color is obviously insufficient. Especially, the election of 14 benefited from the perfect tactical system of the Spurs at that time. In a sense, Popovich is the core of the Spurs.