Becquerel's famous saying. This is an idealistic view. That's right. There is more than one person who holds this view in history. Wang Yangming, a famous scholar in China, also said that this flower is not in my heart. Existence needs to be determined in some way, and once the person as the cognitive subject is determined, the direct way to determine some existence is only perception, which has its correct side.

But now, the criticism of this sentence on the Shanghai Stock Exchange Index generally uses the view that "you can exist without your perception". When our political teacher refuted this sentence, it was this sentence that was refuted by a philosopher. So, before you were born, your mother didn't exist?

Personally, I feel that this rebuttal is a concept of stealing. First of all, the subject of perception is not designated as one person, so it can refer to all people, which means that the essence of existence is perceptible, and what has this essence is existence. Secondly, the concept of perception is also very important. Different people and schools have different definitions of it, so we can't simply look at it. For example, of course, everyone admits that the direct information obtained by the five senses is perception. Then, if I read a book, it says that someone goes into the bamboo forest for sightseeing, and the bamboo is green. Can this information be regarded as perception to me?

Materialist idealism is just an orientation, it's no big deal. The key is whether the philosophy of identity can help you solve the problem. Even now, there are still many people studying Hegel's theory, but that person is a thorough idealist. You can't just say that there are many smart people in the world who are studying a wrong thing. Philosophy is thought, and there should be no absolute right or wrong in this kind of thing.

What's the difference? I turned to spaces.live.com/: for help, an invisible, intangible and lifeless dragon, a dragon that can't be detected by any instrument, and "not a dragon at all"? In other words, there is no objective and absolute world. The only thing that exists is the world we can observe.