Two birds in the forest are not as good as one bird in the hand

Two birds in the forest are not as good as one bird in the hand" means: There are two uncaptured birds in the forest, it is not as good as A bird that has been obtained means that no matter how many things are in the distance, it is not as safe as a few things that have already been obtained. It also means that pursuing two unreliable goals is not as safe as one reliable goal.

This is a great philosophy. Socrates once said, "A bird in the hand" refers to something that is already in hand. "Two birds in the forest" refers to two birds flying freely in the forest. Although two birds are more numerous than one bird, they may fly away at any time in the forest. At any time, as long as you have the bird in your hand, you have at least one possession, which is better than having nothing.

“Two birds in the forest are worth less than one in the hand.” This sentence tells us to cherish what we have now and not to take risks to do things that seem better but have great risks and uncertainties. Or give up what you have now. It also warns us to be more realistic when considering problems and not to be too ambitious. Only what is in our hands is real.

“Two birds in the bush are worth one in the hand” is still a very famous dividend policy theory. This theory holds that: For shareholders and investors, the retained dividends of listed companies are uncertain, and shareholders and investors value cash dividends of real money more, because shareholders prefer certainty.